Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

[syzygy]

Why not go back in time and ask ChatGPT about Rybka vs Fruit?

[syzygy]

Just for the record; Prodeo way ahead of Talkchess on this one (by Ai wizard Mark) https://prodeo.actieforum.com/t1824-rec ... s-reckless But I have to correct myself, memory was wrong I think, this is Mark's own investigations, not with an AI. Sorry!

That reads like LLM output to me (and I'm all for it, though it should be indicated).

For example: "Based on the repo + your zip:"
That's an LLM talking to the user.

[Rebel]

Well, Silvian, instead of blindly trusting Chat-GTP, try a second engine, a 100% clone like Shashchess.

Sorry! At this time, Shashchess is of no interest to me. If I remember correctly, I briefly tested (like last fall) one version. Out of curiosity. I remembered: in October 2025. It was exactly the version Shashchess_391_64_ja_bmi2 compiled by Maestro Jim!

I trust Ciekce statements more than Chat-GTP.

[Dann Corbit]

There is no license violation for Reckless.
Reckless uses the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0

[Rebel]

Why not go back in time and ask ChatGPT about Rybka vs Fruit?

It would be fun to hear the opinion of the new generation of programmers about that case, but better not. Although I don't hold my breath about the outcome.