Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

syzygy
Posts: 5948
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by syzygy »

Why not go back in time and ask ChatGPT about Rybka vs Fruit? ;-)
syzygy
Posts: 5948
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by syzygy »

Eelco de Groot wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2026 9:54 pm :P Just for the record; Prodeo way ahead of Talkchess on this one (by Ai wizard Mark) https://prodeo.actieforum.com/t1824-rec ... s-reckless But I have to correct myself, memory was wrong I think, this is Mark's own investigations, not with an AI. Sorry!
That reads like LLM output to me (and I'm all for it, though it should be indicated).

For example: "Based on the repo + your zip:"
That's an LLM talking to the user.
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7533
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by Rebel »

Sylwy wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2026 7:34 pm
Rebel wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2026 7:04 pm Well, Silvian, instead of blindly trusting Chat-GTP, try a second engine, a 100% clone like Shashchess.
Sorry! At this time, Shashchess is of no interest to me. If I remember correctly, I briefly tested (like last fall) one version. Out of curiosity. I remembered: in October 2025. It was exactly the version Shashchess_391_64_ja_bmi2 compiled by Maestro Jim!

:wink:
I trust Ciekce statements more than Chat-GTP.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Dann Corbit
Posts: 12870
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by Dann Corbit »

There is no license violation for Reckless.
Reckless uses the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7533
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by Rebel »

syzygy wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2026 11:02 pm Why not go back in time and ask ChatGPT about Rybka vs Fruit? ;-)
It would be fun to hear the opinion of the new generation of programmers about that case, but better not. Although I don't hold my breath about the outcome.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Sopel
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by Sopel »

it's so annoying that people are linking to this mental illness on sf discord

at least make it funny next time

god what a waste of time
dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.

Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45620
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by Graham Banks »

Sopel wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2026 1:26 am it's so annoying that people are linking to this mental illness on sf discord

at least make it funny next time

god what a waste of time
Sadly, there has always been some degree of toxicity in our community. Don't let it spoil your enjoyment - it's not worth it.
Speaking from experience.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7343
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Serious concern about RECKLESS engine

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Harmless, back in the Winboard days ...
Not poisonous... more like cotton balls.