Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Jouni
Posts: 3877
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Post by Jouni »

What's the point with Variant "fisherandom"? I can play test games with setting "standard" and Chess960.pgn book. Goes something wrong?
Jouni
Modern Times
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm

Re: Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Post by Modern Times »

I always choose that setting. Engines recognise FRC I guess when they receive the FEN, but no guarantee that all will.
Jouni
Posts: 3877
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Re: Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Post by Jouni »

SF and Reckless both have default:

UCI_Chess960 type check default false (I have not changed)

And still they play. Weird..

FRC is very drawish among top engines. In M. Young test current score is +3,-1,=1152 between SF and Reckless :!: .
Jouni
Modern Times
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm

Re: Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Post by Modern Times »

Indeed, FRC does not solve the draw "problem" with top engines.
User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2834
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Post by Nordlandia »

Modern Times wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 10:56 pm Indeed, FRC does not solve the draw "problem" with top engines.
Even double FRC contains high percentage of draw. How about FRC/DFRC + removing one or two pawns for one side, in return for the castling rights ?
Modern Times
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm

Re: Cute Chess GUI and FRC question

Post by Modern Times »

Nordlandia wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 6:38 pm
Even double FRC contains high percentage of draw.
Not in my experience. There is a huge variation in DFRC openings in terms of evaluations.