New J.A Compiles

[Dokterchen]

Hi Jim,

would you compile the new version of Clover?
https://github.com/lucametehau/CloverEn ... s/tag/v9.0

Thanks in advance
Torsten

[Vinvin]

What's the difference between Stockfish Modjo and regular SF, please ?

Hi Jim,

thank you, also interesting to looking in the work by Jörg.
Good news!

Thanks Jörg!

Best
Frank

[Joerg Oster]

What's the difference between Stockfish Modjo and regular SF, please ?

Hi Jim,

thank you, also interesting to looking in the work by Jörg.
Good news!

Thanks Jörg!

Best
Frank

viewtopic.php?p=982137#p982137
or
https://github.com/joergoster/Stockfish ... s/tag/v1.0

[Jim Ablett]

https://github.com/lucametehau/CloverEngine
Clover 9.0 by Luca Metehau

Clover 9.0 64 JA

Windows/Linux & Android builds

Proton link:
https://drive.proton.me/urls/70HRXW3BGC#v2FH2oBvVGQ3

Smash link:
https://fromsmash.com/Clover90JA

Jim.

[Jim Ablett]

https://sourceforge.net/projects/belofte/
Belofte 2.1.9 by Yves De Billoez

Belofte 2.1.9 64 JA

Windows/Linux & Android profiled builds

Proton link:
https://drive.proton.me/urls/WYYJHKZ4RR#62jzvkcLSxWE

Smash link:
https://fromsmash.com/Belofte219JA

Jim.

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Jim,

could you try to compile:

Simbelmyne by Sam ROELANTS, France
https://github.com/sroelants/simbelmyne

Never compiled yourself before (HCE engine).

Last version on GitHub is: v1.10.0 (240822) ... engine have birthday today!
Since this time, newer changes are available.

Interesting can be:

Zangdar by Philippe CHEVALIER, France
https://github.com/Carbecq/Zangdar
v4.06

Best
Frank

[Jim Ablett]

https://github.com/Witek902/Caissa
Caissa 1.23 by Michal Witanowski

Caissa 1.23 64 JA

Windows/Linux & Android profiled builds

Proton link:
https://drive.proton.me/urls/R1XK3AW8TW#1LacbAdmcArh

Smash link:
https://fromsmash.com/Caissa123JA

Jim.

[Modern Times]

Hi Jim,

could you try to compile:

** Do you actually use all these engines you ask Jim to compile ?

[Frank Quisinsky]

yes

[Frank Quisinsky]

Before you asked:
How it is possible?

I created for a while a small test for different ECO codes.

Which of the codes are most complicated for engines?
The own FEOBOS project helped me at first, and all the own eng-eng games I have in my database. At the moment around 3 Million of games (no blitz games).

Build a TOP-24 ECO code list x 3 positions = 72 positions!
That are equal positions with many pieces on board ... avoid draw is the topic!
Positions, four moves after ECO code is building (FEOBOS was three moves).

So I have 72 test-positions!

As next I compare the results from the 72 test-positions with each of the engines.
I am using TOP-100 enignes or engines in the near of TOP-100.

The results by the enignes I have in an Excel file.
Now, as next ... I am looking, which engines give me the most interesting results for each of the 24 different ECO codes (x 3 positions). If possible and engine can do that, I saved from the mainline, move 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. In most of cases isn't the first move the interesting move.

Unfortunately:
Often results by different engines are very closed.

After ...
Engines plays a tournament, each one against each other.

Such tourneys are running with a longer time control.

With the final result:
Newer produced lines by engines, goes in a very special opening book. Often 8-10 moves after the end of ECO-Code building.

Before I add new lines in the book, the end of the line is checked by my TOP-10 favorits of engines.

Not many work, most is automated! Most work are to find out the 72 test-positions to 24 ECO-codes.
I have a lot of fun with that work, much more as with a simply ratinglist.

The tourneys are interesting.
Engines are in 4 playing-strength groups.
Tourneys with 16 engines, from each of the playing strength groups 4 engines with the best ECO-code results. That are tourneys to one of the lines, speaking before.

With the final result:
Fun pure ... in the time the games are running with good results for _my very special opening book_.
The draw rate is very small.

Best
Frank