Don't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
It appears Ed just puts his name on it...
Moderator: Ras
Don't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
I'm sure Ed would be more than able to make a new stronger Gideon 2002-based Rebel 15 NNUE MP (that was wonderful on my Tasc ChessmachineVernon Crawford wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:44 amDon't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
It appears Ed just puts his name on it...
Exactly, Chris lured me into NNUE which was quite a performance by him. I tried NNUE in ProDeo and it ran with a factor 25-30 slower, dropping the average NPS of 2,5 million below 100,000 because the lack of SSE support of the compiler.
He is not even consistent in his statements, indirectly he is accusing the initial SF programmers they were lazy taking Glaurung as the base for Stockfish.You only want to troll vernon.
I have a surprise for you, the next Rebel will be based on improved Toga source code.Vernon Crawford wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:44 amDon't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
It appears Ed just puts his name on it...
Ed please take directly latest SF dev source, Stockfish Team encourages programmers to use their source respecting GPLv3, in the interest of the whole chess community and to improve the SF engine itself with new ideas!Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:06 amI have a surprise for you, the next Rebel will be based on improved Toga source code.Vernon Crawford wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:44 amDon't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
It appears Ed just puts his name on it...
Or shall I take Glaurung?![]()
Rant, rant, rant, Vernon, do your utmost.
Well, I could add the Rebel 14.2 neural net add to SF, but what should I call it? We don't want to make Vernon even more angry that he already is, now can we? No, that would be cruel.AlexChess wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:59 amEd please take directly latest SF dev source, Stockfish Team encourages programmers to use their source respecting GPLv3, in the interest of the whole chess community and to improve the SF engine itself with new ideas!Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:06 amI have a surprise for you, the next Rebel will be based on improved Toga source code.Vernon Crawford wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:44 amDon't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
It appears Ed just puts his name on it...
Or shall I take Glaurung?![]()
Rant, rant, rant, Vernon, do your utmost.
Ed, every way you choose for Rebel 2022, I'll follow and respect you. Don't give up, you are part of computer chess historyRebel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:40 pmWell, I could add the Rebel 14.2 neural net add to SF, but what should I call it? We don't want to make Vernon even more angry that he already is, now can we? No, that would be cruel.AlexChess wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:59 amEd please take directly latest SF dev source, Stockfish Team encourages programmers to use their source respecting GPLv3, in the interest of the whole chess community and to improve the SF engine itself with new ideas!Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:06 amI have a surprise for you, the next Rebel will be based on improved Toga source code.Vernon Crawford wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:44 amDon't you mean Chris W. and Pawel K. experiment?
It appears Ed just puts his name on it...
Or shall I take Glaurung?![]()
Rant, rant, rant, Vernon, do your utmost.
Rebel 14.2 is surprising strong to run only on 1 CPU!!!! Think of what Ed could do with a MP version...Frank Quisinsky wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 6:12 am Hi Ed,
you wrote:
I have a surprise for you, the next Rebel will be based on improved Toga source code.
In this case it make no sense to test Toga IV 1.1 and Rebel 14.2 NN for my KI-Tourney "run-3".
Means, if you have interest to release Rebel 14.3 NN or Rebel 15.0 NN (based on Toga IV 1.1 with your NN file) in the near future.
At first I am thinking I test both.
I added Rebel 14.2 NN only.
Best
Frank