Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

FriedmannC · Post by **FriedmannC** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:14 am

This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:21 am

FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?

http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit

FriedmannC · Post by **FriedmannC** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:30 am

Thank you very much Graham!

A Distel · Post by **A Distel** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:45 am

Graham Banks wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit

Are there ratings of :
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:25 am

A Distel wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit
Are there ratings of :
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64

No.

FriedmannC · Post by **FriedmannC** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:26 am

Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.

A Distel · Post by **A Distel** » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:07 am

FriedmannC wrote:Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.

Thank you for the information!

A Distel · Post by **A Distel** » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:09 am

Graham Banks wrote:
A Distel wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit
Are there ratings of :
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64
No.

Thank's for the information.

geots · Post by **geots** » Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:03 pm

A Distel wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.
Thank you for the information!

Yes, it is interesting information. Along with being complete bullshit.

gts

jefk · Post by **jefk** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:34 pm

its certainly an interesting engine; but whereas with Gm's speculative
combinations can work, due to slight mistakes of the opponent
and/or psychology (Kasparov became world champ in such a way)
it not often works against engines as Houdini. But if these
guys -the Vitruv programmers- can conquer the horizon effect in
some way or another, or improve the way they already do it
then i think its a very promising engine.
This is what chess is all about.
jef

Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?