Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
FriedmannC
Posts: 273
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:58 pm
Location: SUCEAVA, ROMANIA

Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by FriedmannC » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:14 am

This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
Top
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 30733
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by Graham Banks » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:21 am

FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
Top
FriedmannC
Posts: 273
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:58 pm
Location: SUCEAVA, ROMANIA

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by FriedmannC » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:30 am

Thank you very much Graham! 8-)
Top
A Distel
Posts: 2537
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by A Distel » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:45 am

Graham Banks wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit
Are there ratings of :
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64
Top
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 30733
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by Graham Banks » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:25 am

A Distel wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit
Are there ratings of :
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64
No.
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
Top
FriedmannC
Posts: 273
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:58 pm
Location: SUCEAVA, ROMANIA

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by FriedmannC » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:26 am

Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.
Top
A Distel
Posts: 2537
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by A Distel » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:07 am

FriedmannC wrote:Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.
Thank you for the information!
Top
A Distel
Posts: 2537
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by A Distel » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:09 am

Graham Banks wrote:
A Distel wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bit
Are there ratings of :
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64
No.
Thank's for the information.
Top
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by geots » Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:03 pm

A Distel wrote:
FriedmannC wrote:Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.
Thank you for the information!

Yes, it is interesting information. Along with being complete bullshit.

gts
Top
jefk
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:07 pm
Location: the Netherlands
Contact:
Contact jefk

Re: Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?

Post by jefk » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:34 pm

its certainly an interesting engine; but whereas with Gm's speculative
combinations can work, due to slight mistakes of the opponent
and/or psychology (Kasparov became world champ in such a way)
it not often works against engines as Houdini. But if these
guys -the Vitruv programmers- can conquer the horizon effect in
some way or another, or improve the way they already do it
then i think its a very promising engine.
This is what chess is all about.
jef
jefk
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Computer Chess Club: General Topics”