MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted
Do you see a refutation? I would not be surprised
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
[d] r6r/1p1bkp2/p3p3/7p/4P1p1/1PNnP3/1PPR2PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 22Masterbaiter wrote:Nd3
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3[/pgn]
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I suppose this atleast gurantees a passed pawn. However, i don't yet know if white is guranteed to win.
Little by little. MAYbe.
Oh, maybe the knight is worth more than the bishop is this pawn structure ending, plus it's a pawn up plus, it's now a passed pawn.
But also, i think black has quicker path for king advancing.
Little by little. MAYbe.
Oh, maybe the knight is worth more than the bishop is this pawn structure ending, plus it's a pawn up plus, it's now a passed pawn.
But also, i think black has quicker path for king advancing.
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
[d] r6r/1p1bk3/p3pp2/7p/4P1p1/1PNPP3/1P1R2PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 23Masterbaiter wrote:cxd3
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6[/pgn]
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Jack Lad wrote:[d] r6r/1p1bk3/p3pp2/7p/4P1p1/1PNPP3/1P1R2PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 23Masterbaiter wrote:cxd3
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6[/pgn]
A Warning of what's to come.
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
If a computer can compose real emotional classical music or do many other things that require human understanding, then I believe they will also work out how to reproduce.Terry McCracken wrote:
A Warning of what's to come.
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Actually, I'm sure it has been a common theme in science fiction, that computers and AI might decide one day that they have to do away with humans. And THEN what?
Indeed, seriously now, are we sure this will never happen?
Indeed, seriously now, are we sure this will never happen?
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
No, we're not, even with safeguards.S.Taylor wrote:Actually, I'm sure it has been a common theme in science fiction, that computers and AI might decide one day that they have to do away with humans. And THEN what?
Indeed, seriously now, are we sure this will never happen?
This is a very serious topic with great ramifications.
Terry McCracken