MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted
Do you see a refutation? I would not be surprised
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Nd3
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
r6r/1p1bkp2/p3p3/7p/4P1p1/1PNnP3/1PPR2PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 22
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I suppose this atleast gurantees a passed pawn. However, i don't yet know if white is guranteed to win.
Little by little. MAYbe.
Oh, maybe the knight is worth more than the bishop is this pawn structure ending, plus it's a pawn up plus, it's now a passed pawn.
But also, i think black has quicker path for king advancing.
Little by little. MAYbe.
Oh, maybe the knight is worth more than the bishop is this pawn structure ending, plus it's a pawn up plus, it's now a passed pawn.
But also, i think black has quicker path for king advancing.
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:cxd3
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
r6r/1p1bk3/p3pp2/7p/4P1p1/1PNPP3/1P1R2PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 23
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Jack Lad wrote:Masterbaiter wrote:cxd3
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 a b c d e f g h
r6r/1p1bk3/p3pp2/7p/4P1p1/1PNPP3/1P1R2PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 23
A Warning of what's to come.
Terry McCracken
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
If a computer can compose real emotional classical music or do many other things that require human understanding, then I believe they will also work out how to reproduce.Terry McCracken wrote:
A Warning of what's to come.
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Actually, I'm sure it has been a common theme in science fiction, that computers and AI might decide one day that they have to do away with humans. And THEN what?
Indeed, seriously now, are we sure this will never happen?
Indeed, seriously now, are we sure this will never happen?
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
No, we're not, even with safeguards.S.Taylor wrote:Actually, I'm sure it has been a common theme in science fiction, that computers and AI might decide one day that they have to do away with humans. And THEN what?
Indeed, seriously now, are we sure this will never happen?
This is a very serious topic with great ramifications.
Terry McCracken