


Moderator: Ras
Yes of course SF is faster in MacOS but the issue is you can't run all the Windows chess programs (Chessbase / Fritz / Aquarium etc etc).royb wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 6:43 am You may want to try not running Parallels and Windows under that just to run Stockfish. If you download the MacOS binary from the Stockfish website, that should run faster than the method/configuration you chose?
I say that because on my M2 Macbook Air, I get 1.0 Million nodes per second from the starting position for a game with Stockfish on a single core. Not sure of the clock speed of the M2 Ultra cores...
Oh, I see your point. I run Hiarcs Chess Explorer Pro on MacOS and thus I can run native M-series binaries there. Thanks for clarifying your post!Werewolf wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 12:25 pmYes of course SF is faster in MacOS but the issue is you can't run all the Windows chess programs (Chessbase / Fritz / Aquarium etc etc).royb wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 6:43 am You may want to try not running Parallels and Windows under that just to run Stockfish. If you download the MacOS binary from the Stockfish website, that should run faster than the method/configuration you chose?
I say that because on my M2 Macbook Air, I get 1.0 Million nodes per second from the starting position for a game with Stockfish on a single core. Not sure of the clock speed of the M2 Ultra cores...
An earlier comment by Hai - sorry it may have been in a different thread - claimed AVX was supported in Parallels and it isn't.
Werewolf wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 12:25 pm Yes of course SF is faster in MacOS but the issue is you can't run all the Windows chess programs (Chessbase / Fritz / Aquarium etc etc).
An earlier comment by Hai - sorry it may have been in a different thread - claimed AVX was supported in Parallels and it isn't.
You can't run all windows chess programs on every windows device...Werewolf wrote: ↑Thu Jul 03, 2025 10:15 pm I've done my own testing now and I've found the following:
Test Machine: M2 Ultra Mac Studio 24 cores (16+8)
OS: Latest MacOS as of July 2025
Installed Parallels. Installed Windows 11 Pro afterwards.
Stockfish 17.1 AVX2 - failed to run
Stockfish 17.1 BMI2 - failed to run
Stockfish 17.1 popcnt - fastest running available
On 1 thread SF 17.1 got about 550 KN/s, that is about half as fast as the best from AMD / Intel.
Can't you see my post wasn't talking about running Stockfish natively on MacOS, but running Windows on Paralells which runs on MacOS? That's totally different and your Neon comments etc are therefore not relevant.Hai wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 11:25 pm
I get in the starting position on my M1 Max with only 8 of 10 cores 8400. After 60 seconds I have 7400, due to TBs hits.
A lot of people still don't know how to compile Stockfish.
A lot of people still don't know how to compile a much faster Stockfish.
A lot of people still don't know how to install newest clang and newest gcc and newest... on macOS.
popcnt - fastest running available
Really...
Neon
Dotprod
SME???