If you want the bigger set with draws I can provide it but personally I don't use it: I just get better tuning results from ignoring all drawn games.Robert Pope wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2023 4:56 am I also noticed that it looks like the Leorik data is only decisive games - 1-0 or 0-1, no draws. I wonder if that affects the results, too.
Labeled positions for Texel tuning
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 915
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2020 2:40 am
- Location: Bremen, Germany
- Full name: Thomas Jahn
Re: Labeled positions for Texel tuning
-
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: USA
- Full name: Robert Pope
Re: Labeled positions for Texel tuning
No, I just noticed the difference. 3.5M positions is about the limit for what I can handle anyway.
-
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
- Location: U.S.A
- Full name: Andrew Grant
Re: Labeled positions for Texel tuning
I don't assert that the data I posted is high quality. It was some of the first data to be used for training of anything with ML approaches for the most part back in 2018 or maybe 2017. It was good enough that I was rapidly improving the HCE and closing the elo gap with Komodo (and now dishonored Houdini and Fire). I'm sure you can generate your own data and have better results with some effort.
-
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: USA
- Full name: Robert Pope
Re: Labeled positions for Texel tuning
First test with tuning on Leorik data was a bust. -50 elo relative to my Zurichess tuning. However, I did just add a highly parameterized gamestage function, so I want to roll that back and see what that does first.