Albin Counter-Gambit
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e5 *
The usual continuation is 3. dxe5 d4.
The opening is an uncommon defense to the Queen's Gambit. In exchange for the gambit pawn, Black has a central wedge at d4 and gets some chances for an attack. Often White will try to return the pawn at an opportune moment to gain a positional advantage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albin_Countergambit
Lawrence Trent calls this “one of the most underrated openings, gambits-wise” and considers it perfectly sound, since he has not been able to refute it with some of the strongest computers in the world.
https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-amazi ... ess-review
Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
GAME 39
Stockfish decided to return the gambit pawn, but as indicated in the pre-game notes, black's d4 pawn was indeed like a troublesome thorn.
Stockfish went looking for an advantage on the queenside, while Komodo Dragon focused more on the centre and kingside.
While white was busy picking off pawns, moves like 26...g5, and 31...e4, and then 31...e3, set the scene for some wild and complex chess that my comments could hardly do justice to.
When the smoke had cleared, Komodo Dragon had a knight for the three extra Stockfish pawns, and we were into the endgame.
I felt that there was some quite interesting play in the endgame, but it was always going to be another draw.
Stockfish decided to return the gambit pawn, but as indicated in the pre-game notes, black's d4 pawn was indeed like a troublesome thorn.
Stockfish went looking for an advantage on the queenside, while Komodo Dragon focused more on the centre and kingside.
While white was busy picking off pawns, moves like 26...g5, and 31...e4, and then 31...e3, set the scene for some wild and complex chess that my comments could hardly do justice to.
When the smoke had cleared, Komodo Dragon had a knight for the three extra Stockfish pawns, and we were into the endgame.
I felt that there was some quite interesting play in the endgame, but it was always going to be another draw.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
GAME 40
In the return game, Stockfish thought for 13 minutes before playing the seldom seen 3...Ne7, which led to the queens coming off early, and white still having the extra pawn.
There was some quite interesting play, as Stockfish castled queenside, but allowed its pawn structure to be wrecked, and for white to gain a passed a-pawn. And still a pawn down
Stockfish gained control down the d-file, and felt that white's advantage started to diminish when Komodo Dragon played 20. Ke3 rather than 20. g3.
In the ensuing double rook and pawns endgame (well worth paying through), Komodo Dragon gave back the extra pawn to get its queenside pawns on the move, but Stockfish always had things in hand, and the game was drawn.
In the return game, Stockfish thought for 13 minutes before playing the seldom seen 3...Ne7, which led to the queens coming off early, and white still having the extra pawn.
There was some quite interesting play, as Stockfish castled queenside, but allowed its pawn structure to be wrecked, and for white to gain a passed a-pawn. And still a pawn down
Stockfish gained control down the d-file, and felt that white's advantage started to diminish when Komodo Dragon played 20. Ke3 rather than 20. g3.
In the ensuing double rook and pawns endgame (well worth paying through), Komodo Dragon gave back the extra pawn to get its queenside pawns on the move, but Stockfish always had things in hand, and the game was drawn.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
Benko Gambit
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 *
Originating from a Benoni Defense, black sacrifices a pawn on move 3 to strike back against the white center.
Unlike many other opening gambits, the Benko Gambit is unique in that black’s pawn sacrifice is not intended to generate an attack. Instead, black intends to generate long-term positional pressure against the white queenside.
https://chesspathways.com/benko-gambit/
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 *
Originating from a Benoni Defense, black sacrifices a pawn on move 3 to strike back against the white center.
Unlike many other opening gambits, the Benko Gambit is unique in that black’s pawn sacrifice is not intended to generate an attack. Instead, black intends to generate long-term positional pressure against the white queenside.
https://chesspathways.com/benko-gambit/
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
GAME 41
Stockfish decided to return the pawn early, and obtained some dangerous looking play on the kingside.
With 22. Rxd6, Stockfish sacced the exchange for a pawn, in pursuit of its kingside attack, but Komodo Dragon was able to hold, as can be seen in the position after 29...Nf4.
A series of exchanges following, in which the queens also came off, but again, while there was some interesting play in the endgame, neither engine saw an advantage, and the game played out to a draw.
Stockfish decided to return the pawn early, and obtained some dangerous looking play on the kingside.
With 22. Rxd6, Stockfish sacced the exchange for a pawn, in pursuit of its kingside attack, but Komodo Dragon was able to hold, as can be seen in the position after 29...Nf4.
A series of exchanges following, in which the queens also came off, but again, while there was some interesting play in the endgame, neither engine saw an advantage, and the game played out to a draw.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
GAME 42
The return game followed exactly the same path, until Komodo Dragon played 26. Be3 in preference to the Stockfish choice of 26. Nf5.
Although white's attack didn't appear to be going anywhere, Stockfish still felt that giving back the exchange to go into a Queen, rook and pawns endgame (4 pawns each), was the safest option.
The queens plus a pair of rooks then came off, leaving a drawn rook and pawn endgame, despite the 3 on 2 pawns on the kingside.
The return game followed exactly the same path, until Komodo Dragon played 26. Be3 in preference to the Stockfish choice of 26. Nf5.
Although white's attack didn't appear to be going anywhere, Stockfish still felt that giving back the exchange to go into a Queen, rook and pawns endgame (4 pawns each), was the safest option.
The queens plus a pair of rooks then came off, leaving a drawn rook and pawn endgame, despite the 3 on 2 pawns on the kingside.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
C02 French Defence - Advance Variation, Milner-Barry Gambit
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. c3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Qb6 6. Bd3 *
Recently, the Milner-Barry Gambit in the Advance Variation of the French has gained in popularity again. In the old main lines White was often ready to sacrifice both central pawns to open files against Black's king in the centre.
In recent games various strong players have fallen victim of a new concept in this line in which White quickly brings up the h-pawn to restrict mobility on the kingside. The lack of space often leads to mistakes by Black and gives White good attacking chances.
https://en.chessbase.com/post/robert-ri ... rry-gambit
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. c3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Qb6 6. Bd3 *
Recently, the Milner-Barry Gambit in the Advance Variation of the French has gained in popularity again. In the old main lines White was often ready to sacrifice both central pawns to open files against Black's king in the centre.
In recent games various strong players have fallen victim of a new concept in this line in which White quickly brings up the h-pawn to restrict mobility on the kingside. The lack of space often leads to mistakes by Black and gives White good attacking chances.
https://en.chessbase.com/post/robert-ri ... rry-gambit
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
GAME 43
Komodo Dragon returned the gambit pawn in return for pressure down the semi-open c-file, where there was a weak pawn on c3.
However, in the following sequence of moves, mass exchanges led to a pretty lifeless looking endgame, in which each side had two rooks, a bishop (opposite colours) and 4 kingside pawns.
Sounds like the recipe for a draw, and although it took a while to get there, that was indeed the result.
Komodo Dragon returned the gambit pawn in return for pressure down the semi-open c-file, where there was a weak pawn on c3.
However, in the following sequence of moves, mass exchanges led to a pretty lifeless looking endgame, in which each side had two rooks, a bishop (opposite colours) and 4 kingside pawns.
Sounds like the recipe for a draw, and although it took a while to get there, that was indeed the result.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
GAME 44
Komodo Dragon varied early with 8. Qe2, and hit upon the new idea mentioned in the pre-game notes, of advancing it's h-pawn.
The position after 20...Ra4 looked quite interesting, although both engines had evaluated the game as 0.00 from move 15 onwards.
The black rook on a4 swung across to the kingside, the queens came off, and it didn't look like Stockfish had any other option, than to accept the threefold repetition initiated by Komodo Dragon.
Komodo Dragon varied early with 8. Qe2, and hit upon the new idea mentioned in the pre-game notes, of advancing it's h-pawn.
The position after 20...Ra4 looked quite interesting, although both engines had evaluated the game as 0.00 from move 15 onwards.
The black rook on a4 swung across to the kingside, the queens came off, and it didn't look like Stockfish had any other option, than to accept the threefold repetition initiated by Komodo Dragon.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 43956
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Stockfish 16CPU v Komodo Dragon 16CPU (LTC Gambits Match)
Ponziani - Fraser Gambit
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. c3 Nf6 4. d4 Nxe4 5. d5 Bc5 *
The Fraser sacrifices 1 or 2 pieces for long lasting pressure. A single missed tactic spells doom for either side (computers do not miss these). Extremely accurate play seems to result in a draw; no surprise there.
Always found playing against this with White as awkward, even in my correspondence games.
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. c3 Nf6 4. d4 Nxe4 5. d5 Bc5 *
The Fraser sacrifices 1 or 2 pieces for long lasting pressure. A single missed tactic spells doom for either side (computers do not miss these). Extremely accurate play seems to result in a draw; no surprise there.
Always found playing against this with White as awkward, even in my correspondence games.
gbanksnz at gmail.com