MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Rcf1
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Rcf1
[d] 5r2/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1PN1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/5R2 w - - 22 42
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7[/pgn]
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

S.Taylor wrote:Even though i predicted it is a draw, I didn't mean it had to be a draw by repetition, and at this stage.

You can try to open up some excursions, you just have to check out that it shouldn't be a can of worms.
You might find a winning excursion or a losing one, but i doubt there is a forced winning one.
Yea come on Masterbaiter (Mr. WHAT?), you are welcome to open up any imaginitive manouver if you find a good one at the last minute, now.
Just make sure it does not have any losing variation in it.
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Time to try a new tactic!

Nb1
Looking for interesting people to chat with
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic!

Nb1
Exciting! But I hope you didn't do a new tactic because of ME... unless you have manged to check it out in width and depth to your OWN satisfaction first.
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

S.Taylor wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic!

Nb1
Exciting! But I hope you didn't do a new tactic because of ME... unless you have manged to check it out in width and depth to your OWN satisfaction first.
Nothing to do with you. Martin does what he wants.
Terry McCracken
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic! Nb1
[d] 2r5/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/1N3R2 w - - 24 43
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8[/pgn]
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

Makes sense, because he might have suddenly been forced to draw if he made just one more shuffle.
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

Jack Lad wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic! Nb1
[d] 2r5/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/1N3R2 w - - 24 43
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8[/pgn]
Cheer up Lad! It's not over yet!
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

S.Taylor wrote:Cheer up Lad! It's not over yet!
As soon as I think it is over I will resign but not yet. :)