Easy win for White now. White is strong on the Q side and also a pawn up.S.Taylor wrote:I don't see this game as having been a clear cut win for White. It would be a very difficult end game to absolutely gurantee a White win.Terry McCracken wrote:I would think 31. R4f2.. Black has committed himself with all his pawn pushes.gerold wrote:What is the next best move for White.
MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Maybe d6(+) followed by Nd5.
And whoever is using computers is for SURE right, in whatever he says!
And whoever is using computers is for SURE right, in whatever he says!
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
No, that only draws. White has to prepare for the Endgame and has moved his King to F1 which is a very good move.S.Taylor wrote:Maybe d6(+) followed by Nd5.
And whoever is using computers is for SURE right, in whatever he says!
Terry McCracken
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Kf1
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
5r2/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1PN1P1Pp/1P3R1P/3R1K2 w - - 6 34
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Ke1
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
5r2/3b1r2/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1PN1P1Pp/1P3R1P/3RK3 w - - 8 35
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Ke2
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
2r5/3b1r2/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1PN1P1Pp/1P2KR1P/3R4 w - - 10 36
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I must admit i myself can not say exactly what should and should not be done, and I'm just watching to learn!Masterbaiter wrote:Ra1
e.g. I don't know if one pair of rooks should be exchanged or not. I'm not big enough in endgame.
If all pieces and queenside pawns are off the board, then white can win.