MD v JL

Jack Lad · Post by **Jack Lad** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 9:30 pm

Masterbaiter wrote:d4

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

5r1r/1p1bk3/p3pp2/8/3PP1pp/1PN1P3/1P1R2PP/5RK1 w - - 0 25

S.Taylor · Post by **S.Taylor** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:04 pm

I think i can see the idea (even 2 ideas) of this move.

If it was from long time computer thought, then i assume that Rh7 or Rf7 wasn't considered necesary/effective.

Terry McCracken · Post by **Terry McCracken** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:10 pm

S.Taylor wrote:I think i can see the idea (even 2 ideas) of this move.

If it was from long time computer thought, then i assume that Rh7 or Rf7 wasn't considered necesary/effective.

Watch and learn Stuart.

Masterbaiter · Post by **Masterbaiter** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:39 pm

S.Taylor · Post by **S.Taylor** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 11:52 pm

Terry McCracken wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:I think i can see the idea (even 2 ideas) of this move.

If it was from long time computer thought, then i assume that Rh7 or Rf7 wasn't considered necesary/effective.
Watch and learn Stuart.

I can see that many little differences can be very critical, but it takes a lot of work to get through it all. I, am not doing that work, more than a few momments, from diagrammed positions.

A computer should make it much easier.

I'd say there is plenty stuff going on here right now!

Terry McCracken · Post by **Terry McCracken** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:50 am

S.Taylor wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:I think i can see the idea (even 2 ideas) of this move.

If it was from long time computer thought, then i assume that Rh7 or Rf7 wasn't considered necesary/effective.
Watch and learn Stuart.
I can see that many little differences can be very critical, but it takes a lot of work to get through it all. I, am not doing that work, more than a few momments, from diagrammed positions.

A computer should make it much easier.

I'd say there is plenty stuff going on here right now!

To keep it simple White has the advantage. White's in control.

S.Taylor · Post by **S.Taylor** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 3:42 am

If Rfd2 had not been played now, i think there may have been some pitfalls lurking.
And that is what makes human chess interesting.
I'd say that even at the high levels of Carlsen Anand games, there is sometimes some nice entertainment, like what i just came across now:

Anand indeed, seems to sometimes keep things alive. But so does Carlsen in his ways.

Terry McCracken · Post by **Terry McCracken** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 4:32 am

S.Taylor wrote:If Rfd2 had not been played now, i think there may have been some pitfalls lurking.
And that is what makes human chess interesting.
I'd say that even at the high levels of Carlsen Anand games, there is sometimes some nice entertainment, like what i just came across now:

Anand indeed, seems to sometimes keep things alive. But so does Carlsen in his ways.

Ouch! Carlsen made a serious gaffe to allow that x-ray! Excellent display of technique by Anand.

Jack Lad · Post by **Jack Lad** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:27 pm

Masterbaiter wrote:Rdf2

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

5rr1/1p1bk3/p3pp2/8/3PP1pp/1PN1P3/1P3RPP/5RK1 w - - 2 26

Masterbaiter · Post by **Masterbaiter** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 10:46 pm

MD v JL

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined