MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted

Post by S.Taylor »

Jack Lad wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:Kd1 ... it is possible I will lose this position but then it would not be fun if we were not to mix it up after the McMad gambit!!!
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

r1b1kbnr/1p1p1p2/p3pq1p/2p4Q/3nPP2/1PN4N/PB1P2PP/R2K1B1R w kq - 2 11
I think Nd4 was very wise.

Maybe it was elementary for those looking at a computer.

White may consider Ne2 on next move. (but again, if computer will dispute that, then i trust the computer. I am more likely to do the hard work of checking it out with my own head, if i was playing in an actual game over the board in a tournament).

I must admit, the whole position, after this pawn acceptance on g5, is very provocative for inducing white to throw in some material or other goods, to get the attack going, but prematurely.
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

Masterbaiter wrote:In compensation for the weak pawns white has the open files and his pawns also cover all the valuable centre squares.
I don't think any of this is the issue here.
Atleast it depends on which cause of action we are trying to take, as white.
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Na4
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

r1b1kbnr/1p1p1pq1/p3p2p/2p4Q/N2nPP2/1P5N/PB1P2PP/R2K1B1R w kq - 4 12
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Qd2
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

r1b1k2r/1p2qp2/p1nppn2/7p/4P1p1/1BNNP3/PPPQ2PP/R4RK1 w kq - 3 14
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

S.Taylor wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:In compensation for the weak pawns white has the open files and his pawns also cover all the valuable centre squares.
I don't think any of this is the issue here.
Atleast it depends on which cause of action we are trying to take, as white.
White has the advantage, Black's play is compromised, in both games.
Terry McCracken
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Rad1
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted

Post by Masterbaiter »

Nb6
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Rad1
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

r1b1k2r/1p1nqp2/p1npp3/7p/4P1p1/1BNNP3/PPPQ2PP/3R1RK1 w kq - 5 15
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Nb6
Well played Martin - you successfully refuted the McMad gambit in just 12 moves! 8-)
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

r1b1kbnr/1p1p1pq1/pN2p2p/2p4Q/3nPP2/1P5N/PB1P2PP/R2K1B1R b kq - 5 12


[Event "CTF chess game"]
[Site "CTF"]
[Date "2015.06.07"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Martin Devenport"]
[Black "Jack Lad"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "1300"]
[ECO "B27"]
[Opening "Sicilian"]
[Time "08:36:24"]
[Variation "1.e4 c5 2.Nf3"]
[WhiteElo "2300"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nxg5 e6 4. Qh5 Qf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. f4 Nc6 7. b3 h6 8. Nh3 Nd4 9. Bb2 Nxc2+ 10. Kd1 Nd4 11. Na4 Qg7 12. Nb6 1-0
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL : Gambit accepted

Post by Masterbaiter »

I would hesitate to say that you are beaten yet
Looking for interesting people to chat with