Code: Select all
Tue Aug 12 00:49:44 CDT 2008
time control = 1+1
crafty-22.2R4
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Glaurung 2-epsilon/5 108 7 7 7782 67% -21 20%
2 Fruit 2.1 62 7 6 7782 61% -21 23%
3 opponent-21.7 25 6 6 7780 57% -21 33%
4 Glaurung 1.1 SMP 10 6 6 7782 54% -21 20%
5 Crafty-22.2 -21 4 4 38908 46% 4 23%
6 Arasan 10.0 -185 7 7 7782 29% -21 19%
Tue Aug 12 11:36:10 CDT 2008
time control = 1+1
crafty-22.2R4
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Glaurung 2-epsilon/5 110 6 7 7782 67% -19 21%
2 Fruit 2.1 63 6 7 7782 61% -19 23%
3 opponent-21.7 26 6 6 7782 57% -19 33%
4 Glaurung 1.1 SMP 7 6 7 7782 54% -19 20%
5 Crafty-22.2 -19 4 3 38910 47% 4 23%
6 Arasan 10.0 -187 6 7 7782 28% -19 19%
Wed Aug 13 00:53:43 CDT 2008
time control = 1+1
crafty-22.2R4
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Glaurung 2-epsilon/5 109 7 6 7782 67% -16 20%
2 Fruit 2.1 63 6 7 7782 61% -16 24%
3 opponent-21.7 23 6 6 7781 56% -16 32%
4 Glaurung 1.1 SMP 3 6 7 7782 53% -16 21%
5 Crafty-22.2 -16 4 3 38909 47% 3 23%
6 Arasan 10.0 -182 7 7 7782 28% -16 19%
Wed Aug 13 14:19:47 CDT 2008
time control = 1+1
crafty-22.2R4
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Glaurung 2-epsilon/5 111 7 7 7782 68% -20 21%
2 Fruit 2.1 71 6 7 7782 62% -20 23%
3 opponent-21.7 17 6 6 7780 56% -20 34%
4 Glaurung 1.1 SMP 11 6 7 7782 54% -20 20%
5 Crafty-22.2 -20 3 4 38908 47% 4 23%
6 Arasan 10.0 -191 7 7 7782 28% -20 18%
So -16, -19, -20 and -21.
Now I am going to take the three huge pgn files I have, and run em thru BayesElo two at a time changing the name of crafty-22.2 in one to see how the two versions will compare, knowing that they are _identical_ in reality
Actually I am not going to do that just yet. Just discovered a major issue with the new test. Since I run so many matches of 2 games each, I managed to create enough different filenames so that I ran out of i-nodes. I am going to try to clean this mess up a bit, and then I will simply have to re-run if I decide that the data might be interesting. I am also going to have to find a better way to name these files since 40,000 individual PGN files is somewhat problematic (I am not the only user making thousands of small files, but I am going to probably be the only one that is going to try to solve this so it won't haunt me again. This might have been the issue with an occasional missing PGN file or two in the past runs where the total number of games was always off by just a few.
ah well...
BTW this isn't a cluster problem. I run things over there, then copy the files back to my office machine. I had a large raid0 filesystem I was using, but had forgotten I had formatted it for large files (endgame tables) which limited the number of i-nodes (one i-node per filename) to gain more data blocks. I have re-formatted with default i-node count so this will not be an issue next time around.