My glaurung results

[Tony Thomas]

Are not as good as that of others, then again I have very few games..I still wish that I could use own book for Glaurung, I havent been able to use own book since the epsilons started. Glaurung now plays differently compared to the old version, it manages to win drawn endgames, etc...If it wasnt for the bad results against Thinker, it would have scored higher than the previous version...

Code: Select all

Rank Name                           Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 Hiarcs12SPUCI                 2967   62   58   132   81%  2724   20% 
   2 Naum 3                        2936   53   50   169   79%  2709   24% 
   3 Hiarcs11.2SPUCI               2909   51   48   186   74%  2713   16% 
   4 HiarcsX54UCI                  2864   46   44   208   71%  2699   18% 
   5 Rybka v1.0 Beta.w32           2853   37   36   285   69%  2709   25% 
   6 Fruit 2.3                     2846   41   40   231   68%  2711   26% 
   7 Fruit 2.3.1                   2843   43   42   216   69%  2698   22% 
   8 Thinker 5.1b                  2841   84   79    61   67%  2706   16% 
   9 Thinker 5.1c(Passive)         2833   51   49   155   65%  2715   21% 
  10 Shredder11UCI                 2827   43   42   215   65%  2715   20% 
  11 TogaII 1.2 beta 2a KS/EHP     2826   40   39   234   67%  2702   26% 
  12 TogaII 1.4 beta 5c            2822   47   46   172   65%  2714   23% 
  13 Glaurung 2.0.1 JA             2815   44   43   194   63%  2716   24% 
  14 TogaII 1.3X4                  2795   63   61   100   64%  2688   20% 
  15 Shredder10UCI Balmung         2795   47   45   179   64%  2694  21% 
  16 Glaurung 080420 JA            2792   54   53   128   59%  2724   23% 
  17 TogaII 1.3.1                  2791   54   53   125   62%  2702   26% 

Here is the detailed report...

Code: Select all

15 Glaurung 080420 JA        : 2479  128 (+ 61,= 30,- 37), 59.4 %

Rybka v1.0 Beta.w32           :   4 (+  0,=  1,-  3), 12.5 %
Spike 1.2 Turin               :   4 (+  3,=  0,-  1), 75.0 %
Smarthink 1.00                :   4 (+  0,=  1,-  3), 12.5 %
Trace 1.37a                   :   4 (+  4,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Gandalf 6.01                  :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Ktulu 8.0                     :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Pharaon 3.5.1                 :   4 (+  2,=  2,-  0), 75.0 %
Ruffian 1.0.5                 :   4 (+  4,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
SlowChess Blitz WV 2.1        :   4 (+  0,=  1,-  3), 12.5 %
Aristarch 4.50                :   4 (+  2,=  0,-  2), 50.0 %
CM10th D2Alos                 :   4 (+  2,=  2,-  0), 75.0 %
ChessTiger2007.1 UCI          :   4 (+  0,=  2,-  2), 25.0 %
Fruit 2.3                     :   4 (+  0,=  3,-  1), 37.5 %
DeepSjeng27                   :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Delfi 5.2                     :   4 (+  3,=  0,-  1), 75.0 %
Movei00_8_438                 :   4 (+  1,=  2,-  1), 50.0 %
BugChess2_V1_5_2              :   4 (+  2,=  2,-  0), 75.0 %
Shredder11UCI                 :   4 (+  3,=  0,-  1), 75.0 %
Crafty 21.6 JA                :   4 (+  3,=  1,-  0), 87.5 %
Scorpio 2.0                   :   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2), 37.5 %
AlaricWB707                   :   4 (+  3,=  1,-  0), 87.5 %
Glaurung 2.0.1 JA             :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Zappa Mexico II               :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Frenzee feb 08                :   4 (+  3,=  1,-  0), 87.5 %
TogaII 1.4 beta 5c            :   4 (+  3,=  1,-  0), 87.5 %
Naum 3                        :   4 (+  0,=  2,-  2), 25.0 %
Sloppy 0.2.0 X                :   4 (+  4,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Thinker 5.1c(Passive)         :   4 (+  0,=  0,-  4),  0.0 %
WildCat 8                     :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Prodeo 1.5                    :   4 (+  3,=  1,-  0), 87.5 %
Bright-0.3a                   :   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3), 25.0 %
Hiarcs12SPUCI                 :   4 (+  2,=  0,-  2), 50.0 %

[Tony Thomas]

As you can see, the first one is the bayesian elo report, and the second one is from elostat, just ignore the rating on the detailed one.