Uralochka 1.1b : 2151

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Le Fou numerique
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Elsass

Uralochka 1.1b : 2151

Post by Le Fou numerique »

Hi,

ImageUralochka 1.1b first rating in the UEL: 2151.

PGN on the Accession & Réserve page.

Regards,
Patrick
Tony Thomas

Re: Uralochka 1.1b : 2151

Post by Tony Thomas »

100 point improvement in few days, not bad. Since you rating is generally 100 points lower than that of other rating list, it is probably safe to assume that Uralochenkajkankan is rated 2200-2250.
User avatar
Le Fou numerique
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Elsass

Re: Uralochka 1.1b : 2151

Post by Le Fou numerique »

Tony Thomas wrote:100 point improvement in few days, not bad. Since you rating is generally 100 points lower than that of other rating list, it is probably safe to assume that Uralochenkajkankan is rated 2200-2250.
Hi Tony,

It's not so significatif.

If you look in the list:

Code: Select all

Rank Name                     Ruel    +    -  games score oppo. draws 
  63 Uralochka 1.1b           2151   61   66   128   22%  2397   12% 
the improvement can be in the range of +61 and -66.

There must be play more games. There are more games available and now the rating is 2166 +56 and -58.
Statistiques individuelles des Engines

Regards,
Patrick
Tony Thomas

Re: Uralochka 1.1b : 2151

Post by Tony Thomas »

I guess you didnt understand my post. You have a UEL of 26xx for Fruit were as most other testing groups have it rated above 2800. So that's automatically a difference of 100 point from the norm. Considering that along with the fact that the previous version got a rating of 2050, I was just making a safe assumption.
User avatar
Le Fou numerique
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Elsass

Re: Uralochka 1.1b : 2151

Post by Le Fou numerique »

Tony Thomas wrote:I guess you didnt understand my post. You have a UEL of 26xx for Fruit were as most other testing groups have it rated above 2800. So that's automatically a difference of 100 point from the norm. Considering that along with the fact that the previous version got a rating of 2050, I was just making a safe assumption.
Hi Tony,

If I change the offset I can have a rating by 3000 for Fruit. The most important is the difference and the rang between the engines not the number in itself.

You're right, there are 100 points between the two version but the uncertainty is +/-60. So the 100 points are not absolute.

Regards,
Patrick