100 point improvement in few days, not bad. Since you rating is generally 100 points lower than that of other rating list, it is probably safe to assume that Uralochenkajkankan is rated 2200-2250.
Tony Thomas wrote:100 point improvement in few days, not bad. Since you rating is generally 100 points lower than that of other rating list, it is probably safe to assume that Uralochenkajkankan is rated 2200-2250.
I guess you didnt understand my post. You have a UEL of 26xx for Fruit were as most other testing groups have it rated above 2800. So that's automatically a difference of 100 point from the norm. Considering that along with the fact that the previous version got a rating of 2050, I was just making a safe assumption.
Tony Thomas wrote:I guess you didnt understand my post. You have a UEL of 26xx for Fruit were as most other testing groups have it rated above 2800. So that's automatically a difference of 100 point from the norm. Considering that along with the fact that the previous version got a rating of 2050, I was just making a safe assumption.
Hi Tony,
If I change the offset I can have a rating by 3000 for Fruit. The most important is the difference and the rang between the engines not the number in itself.
You're right, there are 100 points between the two version but the uncertainty is +/-60. So the 100 points are not absolute.