Rising Stars v Fading Warriors 2007

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Which team do you pick to win?

Poll ended at Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:15 am

Rising Stars
5
45%
Fading Warriors
6
55%
 
Total votes: 11

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44540
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Rising Stars v Fading Warriors 2007

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS 2007

Dual Athlon XP1800+
Arena 1.1 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Dann Corbit's Superbook v2.abk (min games=25 won games=10 limit=24 half moves)
40 moves in 75 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
4 cycles (36 rounds)


Rising Stars
Alaric 707
Colossus 2007c
Hamsters 0.4
BugChess2 1.5.1
Twisted Logic 0.099x

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Fading Warriors
CM10th Paralyse
Ruffian 2.1.0
Aristarch 4.50
Thinker 4.7a
Quark 2.35

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The tournament can be followed and games downloaded after every two rounds from here:
http://kirr.homeunix.org/chess/discussi ... f=7&t=2578
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44540
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Fading Warriors narrowly ahead after Round 8 of 36

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS 2007

Dual Athlon XP1800+
Arena 1.1 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640.abk
40 moves in 75 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
4 cycles (36 rounds)


Standings after Round 8

5.5 - CM10th Paralyse
5.5 - Ruffian 2.1.0
5.0 - Alaric 707
4.5 - Twisted Logic 0.099x
4.0 - Aristarch 4.50
3.5 - BugChess2 1.5.1
3.5 - Thinker 4.7a
3.0 - Hamsters 0.4
3.0 - Colossus 2007c
2.5 - Quark 2.35
19.0 - Rising Stars
21.0 - Fading Warriors
The tournament can be followed more closely and games downloaded from here:
http://kirr.homeunix.org/chess/discussi ... f=7&t=2578
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44540
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Fading Warriors with a good lead after Round 16

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS 2007

Dual Athlon XP1800+
Arena 1.1 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640.abk
40 moves in 75 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
4 cycles (36 rounds)


Standings after Round 16

12.5 - CM10th Paralyse
10.0 - Ruffian 2.1.0
10.0 - Aristarch 4.50
9.0 - Alaric 707
7.5 - Twisted Logic 0.099x
7.5 - Hamsters 0.4
6.5 - Colossus 2007c
6.0 - Thinker 4.7a
5.5 - Quark 2.35
5.5 - BugChess2 1.5.1
36.0 - Rising Stars
44.0 - Fading Warriors
The tournament can be followed more closely and games downloaded from here:
http://kirr.homeunix.org/chess/discussi ... f=7&t=2578
gbanksnz at gmail.com
swami
Posts: 6661
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: Fading Warriors with a good lead after Round 16

Post by swami »

I had voted for Fading warriors, they are strong, Instead of Thinker or Ruffian,Crafty should have been used and it would have yield an interesting battle, with well balanced team on both sides.But still I was also curious as to how the rising star engines do now after updates,against the old strong engines.

Were these engines in both the team chosen by 1 organizer or as a group?

Overall,Interesting match.

Regards.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44540
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Fading Warriors with a good lead after Round 16

Post by Graham Banks »

swami wrote:I had voted for Fading warriors, they are strong, Instead of Thinker or Ruffian,Crafty should have been used and it would have yield an interesting battle, with well balanced team on both sides.But still I was also curious as to how the rising star engines do now after updates,against the old strong engines.

Were these engines in both the team chosen by 1 organizer or as a group?

Overall,Interesting match.

Regards.
I selected the teams.
Twisted Logic 20070915 has just replaced Twisted Logic 0.099x, so hopefully that should help balance things up a little more.

Regards, Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com