DO ANY OF THESE ENGINES STAND A CHANCE??

[geots]

RYBKA 2.3.2 32-BIT 1CPU GAUNTLET

Intel Pentium 4
Single Processor- 2.8ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man tablebases
Ponder & Learning = OFF
Perfect 12.32.ctg book
40 moves in 66 minutes repeating (adapted to CCRL 40/40)
All engines = 32 bit
Rybka 2.3.2 will play 20 games v each opponent
Run by George Speight



Rybka 2.3.2 32-bit 1CPU

(0.0-0.0) Hiarcs 11.1
(0.0-0.0) Loop 13.6
(0.0-0.0) Zap!Chess Zanzibar
(0.0-0.0) Strelka 1.0b
(0.0-0.0) Fritz 10
(0.0-0.0) Shredder 10
(0.0-0.0) Glaurung 2 epsilon/2
(0.0-0.0) Fruit 2.2.1
(0.0-0.0) Naum 2.1
(0.0-0.0) Chess Tiger 2007.1

[tiger]

RYBKA 2.3.2 32-BIT 1CPU GAUNTLET

Intel Pentium 4
Single Processor- 2.8ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man tablebases
Ponder & Learning = OFF
Perfect 12.32.ctg book
40 moves in 66 minutes repeating (adapted to CCRL 40/40)
All engines = 32 bit
Rybka 2.3.2 will play 20 games v each opponent
Run by George Speight



Rybka 2.3.2 32-bit 1CPU

(0.0-0.0) Hiarcs 11.1
(0.0-0.0) Loop 13.6
(0.0-0.0) Zap!Chess Zanzibar
(0.0-0.0) Strelka 1.0b
(0.0-0.0) Fritz 10
(0.0-0.0) Shredder 10
(0.0-0.0) Glaurung 2 epsilon/2
(0.0-0.0) Fruit 2.2.1
(0.0-0.0) Naum 2.1
(0.0-0.0) Chess Tiger 2007.1

The current standings clearly demonstrate it.

I know that some are going to claim that you need to play more games, but who's not tired and sick of hearing the same excuse again and again?


// Christophe

[Tony Thomas]

They dont stand a chance unless Rybka got a hideous bug they are able to take advantage of. Ofcourse, the opponents arent that bad either, you should expect some spectacular wins from the opponents.

[PauloSoare]

Why not Rybka 2.3.2a, George?

Paulo Soares

[geots]

RYBKA 2.3.2 32-BIT 1CPU GAUNTLET

Intel Pentium 4
Single Processor- 2.8ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man tablebases
Ponder & Learning = OFF
Perfect 12.32.ctg book
40 moves in 66 minutes repeating (adapted to CCRL 40/40)
All engines = 32 bit
Rybka 2.3.2 will play 20 games v each opponent
Run by George Speight



Rybka 2.3.2 32-bit 1CPU

(0.0-0.0) Hiarcs 11.1
(0.0-0.0) Loop 13.6
(0.0-0.0) Zap!Chess Zanzibar
(0.0-0.0) Strelka 1.0b
(0.0-0.0) Fritz 10
(0.0-0.0) Shredder 10
(0.0-0.0) Glaurung 2 epsilon/2
(0.0-0.0) Fruit 2.2.1
(0.0-0.0) Naum 2.1
(0.0-0.0) Chess Tiger 2007.1

The current standings clearly demonstrate it.

I know that some are going to claim that you need to play more games, but who's not tired and sick of hearing the same excuse again and again?


// Christophe

You being the excellent programmer you are would certainly know more about this than i ever would. But it doesnt seem possible to me for Rybka to think to the depths it does when the nodes per second count is so low. But what do i know- very little.

Regards

[geots]

Hi, Paulo. Actually it is 2.3.2a that is playing. When i post the first results, it will show as 2.3.2a My apologies for the confusion.

Regards

[chessfurby]

There is a slight difference between real nodes and displayed nodes. You can make the engine display 5 nodes per second in the search while it does 50000000 kn/s internally. It is that simple ...

[geots]

There is a slight difference between real nodes and displayed nodes. You can make the engine display 5 nodes per second in the search while it does 50000000 kn/s internally. It is that simple ...

Thanks for the info. As you can tell i'm no programmer for sure.

Regards