A second match Robbolito 0.09 X64 - Deep Rybka 3 x64 (4 threads) with the same conditions ended 13-27 (+4 =18 -18)
The claims of the Threadstarter are obviously hyperbole.
Dann's original smooth scaling approach didn't work for Stockfish (see CEGT private test), so why should it work for Robbo?
Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:48 am
Re: Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
Good luck gentlemen-this most interesting affair has been given over to more capable hands then my own. I leave it at that.
I wish you all the best in the coming new year!
I wish you all the best in the coming new year!
Re: Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
STS 1 - 8 Short 01.03.10swami wrote:I think you'd get better scores, perhaps beyond 705 if you ran the test with your hardware, would like to see it though!kingliveson wrote:There seems to have been improvement. I ran the same test on a stronger hardware and .085g3 score 683 and 684.
What other Robbolito versions out there are best? e4, g3, d2 or...? I'd like to test atleast 3 or 4 other Robbolito for comparison purposes.
Code: Select all
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Total
RobboLito 009 x64 95 91 91 91 91 90 84 80 713
RobboLito 0085e4 x64 96 93 93 87 88 87 84 73 701
RobboLito 0085d2 x64 96 93 93 87 87 87 84 73 700
RobboLito 0085g3 x64 94 93 93 87 87 87 84 73 698
2.0: Open Files and Diagonals
3.0: Knight Outposts
4.0: Square Vacancy
5.0: Bishop vs Knight
6.0: Re-Capturing
7.0: Offer of Simplification
8.0: Advancement of f/g/h pawns
Conditions:
-Arena 2.01 GUI
-10 seconds per position
-128 MB hash
-All engines use 1 CPU
-AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6 GHz
See Analyses.log file for more details.
The test suites are available at http://sites.google.com/site/strategictestsuite/
-
- Posts: 6662
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
Thanks, Franklin. This is definitely an indication that the last version is clearly improved.
It's impressive that Robbolito versions seems to be accurately evaluated and nearly correctly rank-ordered I believe.
It's impressive that Robbolito versions seems to be accurately evaluated and nearly correctly rank-ordered I believe.
-
- Posts: 6662
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
Will Iggorit have a Multi-PV support besides MP?bnemias wrote:Cygwin builds this after slight modification.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:http://ippolit.wikispaces.com/space/changes
I think Multi-PV is not hard to implement. MP is definitely hard in comparison.
Funny thing though is Multi-PV analysis mode is actually equally if not more important feature than an MP.
-
- Posts: 44681
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
Larry Kaufmann posted the following in the Rybka forum:SzG wrote:Some weeks ago in a thread here Jury Osipov claimed Ippolit was a clone of not Rybka 3 but of a later version.Alexander Schmidt wrote:Graham Banks wrote:It's not the Rybka that we all know, but it is Rybka.
Huh?
It is not Rybka, but it's Rybka?
Of course he can't be right if Vasik Rajlich told the truth.
Well, to be precise a new program that was clearly made by decompiling Rybka 3 and putting it back together with changes to the evaluation function published its source code. So not the entire R3 code is public, but most of it other than the exact evaluation function is. The "author" does not publicly admit that his program was taken from R3, but Vas has said so and I can tell you that the similarities are so overwhelming that any claim to the contrary is a joke.
Now let's see Larry get ripped to pieces here also.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 44681
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Money from computer chess. This is the problem !
I recall that your last post here was on October 30th and contained the following:Sylwy wrote:1.Yes-it's an extraterrestrial version of Rybka 5 !Graham Banks wrote:
It's not the Rybka that we all know, but it is Rybka. It is not Rybka 3, despite what Vas said.
You've either been sucked in or you're part of the "rotten army".
I hope it's not the latter.
And by the way, what authors? Who are "they"?
Cheers,
Graham.![]()
2.The authors are anonimous otherwise they will be beheaded in a central plaza somewhere near Australia island - being anti commercial aliens !
3.Graham Banks & co try to save the commercial computer chess ! Money from chess ! This is the real problem !The rest is theory !
![]()
"They " are anti they !![]()
Regards,
PS: only theory ! I'm retired !
To moderation : PLEASE DELETE FOR ETERNITY MY ACCOUNT ON CCC . THE REST OF MY LIFE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS FORUM.EVEN THE COMPUTER CHESS BECOMES FOR ME A GREAT EYESORE. REST FOR ME THE HUMAN CHESS, THE HISTORY, THE MUSIC & A LOT OF OTHERS PLEASURES .
Silvian
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:31 pm
- Location: Sulu Sea
Re: Money from computer chess. This is the problem !



Nice Unc Graham..

( he was jz jkin

Graham Banks wrote:I recall that your last post here was on October 30th and contained the following:Sylwy wrote:1.Yes-it's an extraterrestrial version of Rybka 5 !Graham Banks wrote:
It's not the Rybka that we all know, but it is Rybka. It is not Rybka 3, despite what Vas said.
You've either been sucked in or you're part of the "rotten army".
I hope it's not the latter.
And by the way, what authors? Who are "they"?
Cheers,
Graham.![]()
2.The authors are anonimous otherwise they will be beheaded in a central plaza somewhere near Australia island - being anti commercial aliens !
3.Graham Banks & co try to save the commercial computer chess ! Money from chess ! This is the real problem !The rest is theory !
![]()
"They " are anti they !![]()
Regards,
PS: only theory ! I'm retired !
To moderation : PLEASE DELETE FOR ETERNITY MY ACCOUNT ON CCC . THE REST OF MY LIFE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS FORUM.EVEN THE COMPUTER CHESS BECOMES FOR ME A GREAT EYESORE. REST FOR ME THE HUMAN CHESS, THE HISTORY, THE MUSIC & A LOT OF OTHERS PLEASURES .
Silvian
.
.
................. Mu Shin ..........................
.
................. Mu Shin ..........................
-
- Posts: 44681
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Money from computer chess. This is the problem !
He also posted this on February 6th 2009:mariaclara wrote:hahahhaa
![]()
![]()
Nice Unc Graham..
( he was jz jkin)
Why mods ?
Peter Skinner has the right to insult me on this forum("you pirate chess engine"," you look absolutely stupid") and you deleted my reply ?
Why ?
If Ithis is your policy please delete my account too -otherwise I'll post everyday protest !
Silvian
He must kid a lot.

gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3
Dr.Ex wrote:A second match Robbolito 0.09 X64 - Deep Rybka 3 x64 (4 threads) with the same conditions ended 13-27 (+4 =18 -18)
The claims of the Threadstarter are obviously hyperbole.
Dann's original smooth scaling approach didn't work for Stockfish (see CEGT private test), so why should it work for Robbo?
Sorry, does this mean 27 to Rybka, 13 to Robbolito? Or the opposite? or what?