CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

[BubbaTough]

However this discussion turns out, if there is a game, and the analysis is not public, I would be interested in a link to it. I doubt I would produce any analysis on my own, but I would be happy to look at other people's work and occasionally vote .

-Sam

[LucenaTheLucid]

Sam, I was quite disappointed myself. As well I would like a link also.

[Christopher Conkie]

Sam, I was quite disappointed myself. As well I would like a link also.

Link to what? The thread will be here in the CCC.

[Christopher Conkie]

However this discussion turns out, if there is a game, and the analysis is not public, I would be interested in a link to it. I doubt I would produce any analysis on my own, but I would be happy to look at other people's work and occasionally vote .

-Sam

The core team analysis will be hidden as it is in Hiarcs. However, there will also be a public thread for each move here where everyone will state their preference and (if they want to) show their analysis.

[CRoberson]

Seems to me a referee is needed. This referee would be a neutral
observer. The referee's role would be to mitigate disputes.

A simple example of a dispute is forfeit based on delayed move.
Lets say Chris tries to make the move but the server is down .....
or some sort of network issue that creates a problem for Chris to
enter the move .........

Seems that technology is not perfect (I have lots of experience
in that issue) and thus a referee is needed.

[Harvey Williamson]

Seems to me a referee is needed. This referee would be a neutral
observer. The referee's role would be to mitigate disputes.

A simple example of a dispute is forfeit based on delayed move.
Lets say Chris tries to make the move but the server is down .....
or some sort of network issue that creates a problem for Chris to
enter the move .........

Seems that technology is not perfect (I have lots of experience
in that issue) and thus a referee is needed.

Agreed - If Steve and Graham are not acceptable to your Captain who is? Perhaps you should consider changing your captain. This post seems worth consideration, by the Rybka forum team captain http://hiarcs.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=33926#33926 we are waiting for your team to respond.

[Christopher Conkie]

Seems to me a referee is needed. This referee would be a neutral
observer. The referee's role would be to mitigate disputes.

A simple example of a dispute is forfeit based on delayed move.
Lets say Chris tries to make the move but the server is down .....
or some sort of network issue that creates a problem for Chris to
enter the move .........

Seems that technology is not perfect (I have lots of experience
in that issue) and thus a referee is needed.

Agreed - If Steve and Graham are not acceptable to your Captain who is? Perhaps you should consider changing your captain.

Perhaps you should can it. We are working on what is acceptable to us right now.

[Harvey Williamson]

Seems to me a referee is needed. This referee would be a neutral
observer. The referee's role would be to mitigate disputes.

A simple example of a dispute is forfeit based on delayed move.
Lets say Chris tries to make the move but the server is down .....
or some sort of network issue that creates a problem for Chris to
enter the move .........

Seems that technology is not perfect (I have lots of experience
in that issue) and thus a referee is needed.

Agreed - If Steve and Graham are not acceptable to your Captain who is? Perhaps you should consider changing your captain.

Perhaps you should can it. We are working on what is acceptable to us right now.

Excellent maybe democracy is working at last.

[Christopher Conkie]

Seems to me a referee is needed. This referee would be a neutral
observer. The referee's role would be to mitigate disputes.

A simple example of a dispute is forfeit based on delayed move.
Lets say Chris tries to make the move but the server is down .....
or some sort of network issue that creates a problem for Chris to
enter the move .........

Seems that technology is not perfect (I have lots of experience
in that issue) and thus a referee is needed.

Yes and if a seagull drops a rock on your head from 200 feet......

If if if if........

All I hear is "if".

That Charles is a completely banal excuse. It is interesting to see just how much that Harvey's trolls don't want to play when the conditions are exactly the same.

We have 7 people who have real names, that can be provided. Hiarcs have over 15 half of which don't write with their real names.

Who is to say they don't have accounts here.

We note for example that Ulysses that arch creator of multiple accounts is one of their team.

Come on...get a grip......a real firm grip.....

I tell you what we will do......

Only the 7 members of the CCC/CTF team can vote on the move. In this way we know that troll city (Hiarcs) are not affecting the CCC/CTF vote.

This also is fair as not everyone in the Hiarcs forum can vote for their teams move.

Happy?

Just call me Mr. Compromise......

[Christopher Conkie]

Seems to me a referee is needed. This referee would be a neutral
observer. The referee's role would be to mitigate disputes.

A simple example of a dispute is forfeit based on delayed move.
Lets say Chris tries to make the move but the server is down .....
or some sort of network issue that creates a problem for Chris to
enter the move .........

Seems that technology is not perfect (I have lots of experience
in that issue) and thus a referee is needed.

Agreed - If Steve and Graham are not acceptable to your Captain who is? Perhaps you should consider changing your captain.

Perhaps you should can it. We are working on what is acceptable to us right now.

Excellent maybe democracy is working at last.

We have decided to be as democratic as you......

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 66&t=28979