SPCC: Testrun of Reckless 0.9.0 finished

[pohl4711]

My UHO-Top15 Ratinglist is the world's first engine-ratinglist, using UHO-openings, and the world's first ratinglist offering additional Gamepair-statistics.

Testrun of Reckless 0.9.0 finished.

https://www.sp-cc.de

Also take a look at the EAS-Ratinglist, the world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines but engines's style of play:
https://www.sp-cc.de/eas-ratinglist.htm

As usual, the most spectacular sac-wins of the latest testrun (won by the tested engine) can be replayed directly on my website. The pgn-viewer (by ChessBase) needs Javascript on and Adblockers off:
https://www.sp-cc.de/view-games-with-sacs.htm

(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache with <strg>+<shift>+<delete> to reload the graphics/diagrams on my website)

[vencenda]

Thank you for all your work on SPCC. I really appreciate how systematic and up-to-date your list is.

[Jouni]

Reckless authors are hardworking: In March every day 1-6 commits . Including 2 new nets both 3-4 elo in LTC.

[Uri Blass]

Reckless 0.9.0 is still 2 years behind stockfish based on the graphs of SPCC(stockfish16.1 of 2024 is at similiar level to Reckless0.9.0 based on the graphs)

[pohl4711]

Thank you for all your work on SPCC. I really appreciate how systematic and up-to-date your list is.

Thank you !
Time flies... SPCC gets 12 years old in may, 2026.
So much work in these years besides doing the ratinglist: Created UHO openings and the EAS Tool, all for a bright future of computerchess.

[pohl4711]

Reckless 0.9.0 is still 2 years behind stockfish based on the graphs of SPCC(stockfish16.1 of 2024 is at similiar level to Reckless0.9.0 based on the graphs)

True, but Stockfish has made very small progress (40 Celo) in these 2 years. Perhaps, Reckless can progress faster? We will see. I am very impressed by the progress of Reckless until now.
But, the higher the Celo, the harder further progress...
Interesting times ahead!

[vencenda]

Reckless 0.9.0 is still 2 years behind stockfish based on the graphs of SPCC(stockfish16.1 of 2024 is at similiar level to Reckless0.9.0 based on the graphs)

On Full UHO-Ratinglist, Reckless 0.9.0 seems to be significantly stronger than Stockfish 17, and only 11 Elo behind Stockfish 17.1 which was released a little less than a year ago. It seems to me that it's closer to 1 year behind.

[Uri Blass]

Reckless 0.9.0 is still 2 years behind stockfish based on the graphs of SPCC(stockfish16.1 of 2024 is at similiar level to Reckless0.9.0 based on the graphs)

On Full UHO-Ratinglist, Reckless 0.9.0 seems to be significantly stronger than Stockfish 17, and only 11 Elo behind Stockfish 17.1 which was released a little less than a year ago. It seems to me that it's closer to 1 year behind.

You are rught and I wonder what is the reason for the differences
Fulll UHO shows the following:

1 Stockfish 18 260131 : 3909 4 4 19000 67.6% 3777 48.7%
2 Stockfish 17.1 250330 : 3884 2 2 63000 67.4% 3752 48.8%
3 Reckless 0.9.0 a512 : 3873 5 5 14000 63.2% 3776 48.9% (NEW)
4 Reckless 260108 a512 : 3858 4 4 18000 61.5% 3774 48.7% (OLD)
5 Torch 4a a512 : 3852 4 4 23000 60.9% 3772 49.5%
6 Reckless 251212 a512 : 3844 4 4 19000 60.6% 3766 48.7%
7 Torch 4 a512 : 3843 3 3 36000 61.0% 3762 49.2%
8 Stockfish 17 240906 : 3843 3 3 43000 70.2% 3687 48.7%

nain page has the following

1 Stockfish 260218 a512 : 3877 4 4 15000 67.5% 3745 49.2%
2 Stockfish 18 260131 : 3873 4 4 15000 67.0% 3746 49.0%
3 Reckless 0.9.0 a512 : 3835 4 4 15000 61.7% 3748 49.0%
4 Torch 4a a512 : 3815 4 4 15000 58.9% 3750 49.7%
5 PlentyChess 7.0.37 : 3799 4 4 15000 56.7% 3751 48.6%
6 Obsidian 250706 a512 : 3783 4 4 15000 54.4% 3752 50.2%
7 Alexandria 9.0 a512 : 3757 4 4 15000 50.5% 3753 49.2%
8 Integral 250805 a512 : 3751 4 4 15000 49.6% 3754 50.5%

[vencenda]

As I understand it, the main list is based only on games between the top 15 engines, while the full list also contains older games. So the game pools are different.

Also, I think the main list anchors Stockfish 18 at 3873 Elo, while the full list doesn’t. Although, IMHO, it would be better if it did, so the two lists would be more comparable to each other. But I might be missing something.

[pohl4711]

As I understand it, the main list is based only on games between the top 15 engines, while the full list also contains older games. So the game pools are different.

Also, I think the main list anchors Stockfish 18 at 3873 Elo, while the full list doesn’t. Although, IMHO, it would be better if it did, so the two lists would be more comparable to each other. But I might be missing something.

Correct. In the full ratinglist, the game (or opponent) pools are different. Very different, when you look at amount of played games.
So, for getting a valid progress-history of Stockfish, the Celo-diagrams on my main site are the better choice!
That is the reason, why I include the #2 engine in there, too. First Torch, now Reckless... Here you have the better view on the race/competition between #1 and #2