Komodo 10 released

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

cma6
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 5:58 pm

Re: Magnify in K10

Post by cma6 »

Thanks, LK, I will experiment with that.
whereagles
Posts: 565
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm

Re: Too expensive

Post by whereagles »

The $99 is just about par for US standards. Trouble is, those are high standards :D
abulmo
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by abulmo »

Laskos wrote:I think some engine authors do use some winning probability, say 65% for 100cp. And it correlates well with the static value of the pawn in endgame for many.
Take kpk as an example. In kpk, there are 67,168% of winning positions (for the side with the pawn), so here we have an exact relationship between one pawn and a winning probability. But... each kpk position is or an exact draw or an exact win not a probable win at 67.168%. A good evaluation should give a value of 0 or +mate (In practice a more moderate value, with some tricks to allow progress) not a +100 cp to a kpk position.
Richard
schack
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by schack »

Larry et al - is the engine available from Chessbase the same as the one directly from you guys? (I know the Chessbase people tend to put some kind of copy protection on their versions.)
lkaufman
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Full name: Larry Kaufman

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by lkaufman »

schack wrote:Larry et al - is the engine available from Chessbase the same as the one directly from you guys? (I know the Chessbase people tend to put some kind of copy protection on their versions.)
As of now, they are identical except for copy protection differences and some GUI set options; for example we make 1 thread the default, CB tries to guess how many cores you have, often reporting 8 instead of 4 and using 8 when 4 is a better choice. If we offer any free bug-fix upgrades CB has the option to offer them too. CB will probably not offer unfree upgrades (10.1,10.2 etc).
Komodo rules!
User avatar
Ozymandias
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by Ozymandias »

lkaufman wrote:CB will probably not offer unfree upgrades (10.1,10.2 etc).
You don't know? Isn't that in the contract?
lkaufman
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Full name: Larry Kaufman

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by lkaufman »

Ozymandias wrote:
lkaufman wrote:CB will probably not offer unfree upgrades (10.1,10.2 etc).
You don't know? Isn't that in the contract?
The contract only gives them upgrades for a short time, but we can always agree to give them upgrades after that date on request.
Komodo rules!
rabbits23
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 4:57 am
Location: Randwick Australia

Re: Too expensive

Post by rabbits23 »

Agreed. I've got Komodo 9.42 and paid just over $100 for it. I've enjoyed
experimenting with it enormously and don't begrudge the programmers a cent
of their money.
Allan
yanquis1972
Posts: 1766
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:14 am

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by yanquis1972 »

whats a moderate adjustment to 'reduction' look like? (for multiple cores, so presumably negative value --) 1, 10, 50?
lkaufman
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Full name: Larry Kaufman

Re: Komodo 10 released

Post by lkaufman »

yanquis1972 wrote:whats a moderate adjustment to 'reduction' look like? (for multiple cores, so presumably negative value --) 1, 10, 50?
I would call 10 or -10 a moderate adjustment
Komodo rules!