MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Rc1
8 | |||||||||
7 | |||||||||
6 | |||||||||
5 | |||||||||
4 | |||||||||
3 | |||||||||
2 | |||||||||
1 | |||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
1r6/3b1r2/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/2R5 w - - 30 46
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Rc3
8 | |||||||||
7 | |||||||||
6 | |||||||||
5 | |||||||||
4 | |||||||||
3 | |||||||||
2 | |||||||||
1 | |||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1PR1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/8 w - - 32 47
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
8 | |||||||||
7 | |||||||||
6 | |||||||||
5 | |||||||||
4 | |||||||||
3 | |||||||||
2 | |||||||||
1 | |||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1PRK1R1P/8 b - - 33 47
Draw agreed - thanks for the game Martin.

-
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 13447
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:02 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Full name: Matthew Hull
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.Terry McCracken wrote:No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
Matthew Hull
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
As I said, Martin isn't use to playing computer corr. chess. Martin accepted his conditions but really shouldn't have. I didn't want him to. Martin made mostly human moves, not so for Mc Cheat. All his moves were computer.mhull wrote:I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.Terry McCracken wrote:No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
I know as I checked. It is depraved to promote this form of chess.
Terry McCracken