MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Rc1
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Rc1
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

1r6/3b1r2/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/2R5 w - - 30 46
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Rc3
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Rc3
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1PR1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/8 w - - 32 47
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1PRK1R1P/8 b - - 33 47

Draw agreed - thanks for the game Martin. 8-)
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by gerold »

Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.
Terry McCracken
User avatar
mhull
Posts: 13447
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Full name: Matthew Hull

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by mhull »

Terry McCracken wrote:
gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.
I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.
Matthew Hull
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

mhull wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.
I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.
As I said, Martin isn't use to playing computer corr. chess. Martin accepted his conditions but really shouldn't have. I didn't want him to. Martin made mostly human moves, not so for Mc Cheat. All his moves were computer.

I know as I checked. It is depraved to promote this form of chess.
Terry McCracken