MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

Jack Lad wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:Cheer up Lad! It's not over yet!
As soon as I think it is over I will resign but not yet. :)
It was over the first time. However I talked to him about your whinging and he gave you a second chance.

His Nb1 has merit but it isn't enough and it has made you quite happy.

If his plan doesn't change, then a draw will be the outcome. Your computer is strong and it will take some real work to undermine your programme.

He's underestimated it as he never plays this kind of chess.
Terry McCracken
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Nc3
Looking for interesting people to chat with
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

Terry McCracken wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic!

Nb1
Exciting! But I hope you didn't do a new tactic because of ME... unless you have manged to check it out in width and depth to your OWN satisfaction first.
Nothing to do with you. Martin does what he wants.
So why can't HE tell me that?
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

S.Taylor wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic!

Nb1
Exciting! But I hope you didn't do a new tactic because of ME... unless you have manged to check it out in width and depth to your OWN satisfaction first.
Nothing to do with you. Martin does what he wants.
So why can't HE tell me that?
Unimportant? Not relevant?
Terry McCracken
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

ok. not a big deal.
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by gerold »

S.Taylor wrote:ok. not a big deal.
As long as Black doesn't exchange any pieces it is a draw.
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

gerold wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:ok. not a big deal.
As long as Black doesn't exchange any pieces it is a draw.
That's if he can stop Martin from opening it and forcing trades.
Terry McCracken
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Nc3
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

5r2/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1PN1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/5R2 w - - 26 44
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Na4
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Na4
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

1r6/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/5R2 w - - 28 45