MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
We are just trying out a different line. I think I should still win and McMad thinks he can draw. In that case I should lose instead!
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Glad you decided to try this line out. I was curious. OK the move is ...... Rf4
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Glad you decided to try this line out. I was curious. OK the move is ...... Rf4
8 | |||||||||
7 | |||||||||
6 | |||||||||
5 | |||||||||
4 | |||||||||
3 | |||||||||
2 | |||||||||
1 | |||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
5rr1/1p2k3/p1b1pp2/8/3PPRpp/1PN1P3/1P4PP/5RK1 w - - 4 27
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Sorry I have been out of town and have not had a chance to look.
Now that I am looking I will play g3
Now that I am looking I will play g3
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
yes, i see.
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Sorry I have been out of town and have not had a chance to look. Now that I am looking I will play g3
8 | |||||||||
7 | |||||||||
6 | |||||||||
5 | |||||||||
4 | |||||||||
3 | |||||||||
2 | |||||||||
1 | |||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
5rr1/1p2k3/p1b1pp2/8/3PPRp1/1PN1P1Pp/1P5P/5RK1 w - - 0 28
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Beautiful!
No striving for anything.
No striving for anything.
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I could have taken the pawn on g3 instead but this probably gives the game to white.S.Taylor wrote:Beautiful! No striving for anything.
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
He can still try to win that pawn on g4 just as easily like this. But if you exchanged pawns, you might JUST have been still able to double your rooks on the h file and got at whites king and held him to a draw from checks or similar. Atleast that option to fight back would still have been in the air.Jack Lad wrote:I could have taken the pawn on g3 instead but this probably gives the game to white.S.Taylor wrote:Beautiful! No striving for anything.