SF6 moves comparison: Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015

[Ferdy]

Just a quick run @ 3sec per position.

Code: Select all

Moves matches between Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT and players from
Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015, after Round 1

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
id name Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT
Hash 128 MB, Threads 1, MoveTime 3000 ms
Analyses start at move 12 till end of game

MatchRank             Players  CorrectMatch  TotalPos   CorrectMatchRate

      1                    So,W          17      21           80.95%
      2       Vachier Lagrave,M          21      29           72.41%
      3             Mamedov,Rau          19      29           65.52%
      4               Kramnik,V          18      28           64.29%
      5               Carlsen,M          26      42           61.90%
      6               Caruana,F          47      78           60.26%
      7                Adams,Mi          15      27           55.56%
      8                 Anand,V          23      42           54.76%
      9            Mamedyarov,S          42      79           53.16%
     10                  Giri,A           8      20           40.00%

Sample Log from top 1.

Player: So,W

rnbqkb1r/ppp2p1p/4n1p1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/5PPP/R1BQ1K1R w kq - fmvn 12; sm "d1e2"; c3 "Result 1-0"; c2 "So,W - Giri,A"; c1 "Round 1"; c0 "Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015"; hmvc 1;
>> isready
<< readyok
>> ucinewgame
>> position fen rnbqkb1r/ppp2p1p/4n1p1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/5PPP/R1BQ1K1R w kq - 1 12
>> go movetime 3000
<< info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp 137 nodes 51 nps 51000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv f3e5
<< info depth 2 seldepth 2 multipv 1 score cp 135 nodes 254 nps 254000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv f3e5 a7a6
<< info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 133 nodes 484 nps 484000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4 b7b6 g2g3
<< info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 184 nodes 679 nps 679000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4 b7b6 h4h5 a7a6 h5g6
<< info depth 5 seldepth 6 multipv 1 score cp 86 nodes 3627 nps 3627000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv a1b1 c7c5 h2h4 a7a5 d1a4 b8c6
<< info depth 6 seldepth 7 multipv 1 score cp 130 nodes 5812 nps 5812000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4 a7a5 b4b5 b8d7 d1e2 c7c6
<< info depth 7 seldepth 8 multipv 1 score cp 57 nodes 12581 nps 698944 tbhits 0 time 18 pv c1b2 f8g7 h2h4 a7a5 h4h5 a5b4 a3b4 a8a1
<< info depth 8 seldepth 8 multipv 1 score cp 39 nodes 20065 nps 771730 tbhits 0 time 26 pv c1b2 f8g7 d1e2 e8g8 c3d5 c7c6 b2g7 e6g7 d5e7 g8h8 e7c8 d8c8
<< info depth 9 seldepth 13 multipv 1 score cp 44 nodes 31023 nps 816394 tbhits 0 time 38 pv c1b2 f8g7 h2h4 a7a5 d3c2 a5b4 d1d8 e6d8 a1e1 d8e6 a3b4 e8g8
<< info depth 10 seldepth 17 multipv 1 score cp 30 nodes 57887 nps 1052490 tbhits 0 time 55 pv c1b2 f8g7 h2h4 e8g8 d3e4 f7f5 e4c2 a7a5 h4h5 a5b4 a3b4 a8a1 d1a1
<< info depth 11 seldepth 17 multipv 1 score cp 38 nodes 82767 nps 962406 tbhits 0 time 86 pv c1b2 f8g7 h2h4 e8g8 d3e4 f7f5 e4c2 a7a5 h4h5 a5b4 a3b4 d8d1 a1d1 b8c6
<< info depth 12 seldepth 21 multipv 1 score cp 29 nodes 199759 nps 988905 tbhits 0 time 202 pv c1b2 f8g7 h2h4 e8g8 d3e4 h7h5 d1d8 f8d8 a1d1 b8c6 d1d8 e6d8 b4b5 c6d4 f3d4 g7d4
<< info depth 13 seldepth 21 multipv 1 score cp 41 nodes 698026 nps 1068952 tbhits 0 time 653 pv c1e3 f8g7 d1d2 e8g8 h2h4 h7h5 a1d1 b8c6 f3g5 e6g5 h4g5 c8e6 f2f4 c6d4
<< info depth 14 seldepth 21 multipv 1 score cp 40 nodes 990973 nps 1038755 tbhits 0 time 954 pv c1e3 f8g7 d1c2 c7c5 h2h4 b8c6 a1d1 c6d4 e3d4 e6d4 f3d4 g7d4 h4h5 c8e6 h5g6 h7g6 h1h8 d4h8 b4c5
<< info depth 15 seldepth 23 multipv 1 score cp 46 nodes 1318158 nps 1038737 tbhits 0 time 1269 pv c1e3 f8g7 d1c2 c7c5 h2h4 b8c6 a1d1 c6d4 e3d4 e6d4 f3d4 c5d4 c3d5 c8e6 h4h5 e6d5 c4d5
<< info depth 16 seldepth 25 multipv 1 score cp 43 nodes 2195215 nps 1078729 tbhits 0 time 2035 pv c1e3 a7a5 b4b5 f8g7 d1c2 b8d7 h2h4 d7e5 f3e5 g7e5 a1d1 d8e7 h4h5 e7a3 h5g6 h7g6 h1h8 e5h8 c3d5
<< info nodes 3166339 time 3000
<< bestmove c1e3 ponder f8g7
move not matched??

rnbqk2r/ppp2pbp/4n1p1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/4QPPP/R1B2K1R w kq - fmvn 13; sm "c1g5"; c3 "Result 1-0"; c2 "So,W - Giri,A"; c1 "Round 1"; c0 "Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015"; hmvc 3;
>> isready
<< readyok
>> ucinewgame
>> position fen rnbqk2r/ppp2pbp/4n1p1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/4QPPP/R1B2K1R w kq - 3 13
>> go movetime 3000
<< info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp 108 nodes 68 nps 34000 tbhits 0 time 2 pv c1g5
<< info depth 2 seldepth 2 multipv 1 score cp 293 nodes 131 nps 65500 tbhits 0 time 2 pv c1g5 g7c3 g5d8 c3a1
<< info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 293 nodes 199 nps 99500 tbhits 0 time 2 pv c1g5 g7c3 g5d8
<< info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp -4 nodes 708 nps 236000 tbhits 0 time 3 pv c1b2 e8g8 h2h3 a7a6
<< info depth 5 seldepth 5 multipv 1 score cp 36 nodes 1268 nps 422666 tbhits 0 time 3 pv c1d2 e8g8 h2h4 a7a6 c4c5
<< info depth 6 seldepth 6 multipv 1 score cp 15 nodes 1890 nps 472500 tbhits 0 time 4 pv c1d2 e8g8 h2h4 e6d4 f3d4 d8d4
<< info depth 7 seldepth 7 multipv 1 score cp -22 nodes 3977 nps 662833 tbhits 0 time 6 pv e2d2 e8g8 h2h4 e6d4 h4h5 d4f3 g2f3
<< info depth 8 seldepth 8 multipv 1 score cp 0 nodes 6707 nps 745222 tbhits 0 time 9 pv c1d2 e8g8 h2h4 b8c6 e2e3 e6d4 h4h5 d4f3
<< info depth 9 seldepth 10 multipv 1 score cp -33 nodes 17374 nps 868700 tbhits 0 time 20 pv c1g5 d8d7 g5d2 e8g8 h2h4 b8c6 h4h5 e6d4 f3d4
<< info depth 10 seldepth 16 multipv 1 score cp -3 nodes 51585 nps 955277 tbhits 0 time 54 pv c1g5 f7f6 g5d2 b8c6 h2h4 e8g8 c4c5 e6d4 d3c4 g8h8 f3d4
<< info depth 11 seldepth 16 multipv 1 score cp 14 nodes 61598 nps 1140703 tbhits 0 time 54 pv c1g5 f7f6 a1d1 f6g5 d3g6 h7g6 d1d8 e8d8 c3b5 b8c6 f3g5 e6g5 e2d2 c8d7 d2g5 c6e7
<< info depth 12 seldepth 19 multipv 1 score cp 49 nodes 94324 nps 1059820 tbhits 0 time 89 pv c1g5 d8d7 a1d1 e8g8 d3c2 d7e8 c3d5 f7f6 g5d2 b8c6 d2c3 a7a5 h2h4
<< info depth 13 seldepth 19 multipv 1 score cp 58 nodes 110999 nps 1047160 tbhits 0 time 106 pv c1g5 d8d7 a1d1 e8g8 d3c2 d7e8 c3d5 f7f6 g5d2 b8c6 d2c3 a7a5 h2h4 a5b4 a3b4
<< info depth 14 seldepth 22 multipv 1 score cp 45 nodes 292992 nps 1162666 tbhits 0 time 252 pv c1g5 d8d7 c3d5 e8g8 g5f6 c7c6 d5e7 g8h8 f6g7 e6g7 a1e1 d7e8 e7c8 e8c8 h2h4 b8d7 e2b2 f7f6
<< info depth 15 seldepth 29 multipv 1 score cp 42 nodes 567230 nps 1206872 tbhits 0 time 470 pv c1g5 d8d7 c3d5 e8g8 g5f6 e6f4 e2e4 f4d5 f6g7 g8g7 c4d5 f8d8 e4d4 f7f6 a1e1 a7a5 h2h4 a5b4 a3b4
<< info depth 16 seldepth 29 multipv 1 score cp 51 nodes 788784 nps 1179049 tbhits 0 time 669 pv c1g5 d8d7 c3d5 e8g8 g5f6 e6f4 e2e4 f4d5 f6g7 g8g7 c4d5 f8d8 d3c4 d8e8 e4d4 g7g8 h2h4 d7g4 d5d6 g4d4 f3d4 c7d6
<< info depth 17 seldepth 31 multipv 1 score cp 37 nodes 2135777 nps 1158858 tbhits 0 time 1843 pv c1g5 f7f6 g5d2 b8c6 h2h4 e8g8 h4h5 e6d4 f3d4 c6d4 e2e3 d4f5 e3f3 f8e8 a1e1 e8e1 d2e1 f5d4 f3d5 d8d5 c3d5
<< info depth 18 seldepth 31 multipv 1 score cp 39 nodes 2597442 nps 1153393 tbhits 0 time 2252 pv c1g5 f7f6 a1d1 f6g5 d3g6 h7g6 d1d8 e8d8 f3g5 e6g5 e2d2 b8d7 d2g5 g7f6 g5d2 h8h4 c3d5 h4d4 d2c2 c7c6 d5f6 d7f6 c2g6 d4d6 h2h3
<< info depth 19 seldepth 32 multipv 1 score cp 39 nodes 3050317 nps 1163355 tbhits 0 time 2622 pv c1g5 f7f6 a1d1 f6g5 d3g6 h7g6 d1d8 e8d8 f3g5 e6g5 e2d2 b8d7 d2g5 g7f6 g5d2 h8h4 c3d5 h4d4 d2c2 f6e7 d5e7 d8e7 c4c5 a7a5 b4b5 e7d8 f1e2 d7e5 h1d1 d4d1
<< info nodes 3509617 time 3003
<< bestmove c1g5 ponder f7f6
move matched!!

rnbqk2r/ppp2p1p/4nbp1/6B1/1PP5/P1NB1N2/4QPPP/R4K1R w kq - fmvn 14; sm "g5f6"; c3 "Result 1-0"; c2 "So,W - Giri,A"; c1 "Round 1"; c0 "Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015"; hmvc 5;
>> isready
<< readyok
>> ucinewgame
>> position fen rnbqk2r/ppp2p1p/4nbp1/6B1/1PP5/P1NB1N2/4QPPP/R4K1R w kq - 5 14
>> go movetime 3000
<< info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp 143 nodes 68 nps 68000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4
<< info depth 2 seldepth 2 multipv 1 score cp 106 nodes 263 nps 131500 tbhits 0 time 2 pv g5f6 d8f6
<< info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 123 nodes 466 nps 233000 tbhits 0 time 2 pv c3e4 f6g5 e4g5
<< info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 55 nodes 754 nps 377000 tbhits 0 time 2 pv h2h4 e8g8 g5f6 d8f6
<< info depth 5 seldepth 5 multipv 1 score cp 25 nodes 1732 nps 577333 tbhits 0 time 3 pv c3d5 f6g5 f3g5 e8g8 g5e6
<< info depth 6 seldepth 6 multipv 1 score cp 25 nodes 2136 nps 712000 tbhits 0 time 3 pv c3d5 f6g5 f3g5 e8g8 g5e6 c8e6
<< info depth 7 seldepth 8 multipv 1 score cp 43 nodes 3158 nps 789500 tbhits 0 time 4 pv g5f6 d8f6 e2e1 f6d8 e1e3 e8g8 h2h3
<< info depth 8 seldepth 8 multipv 1 score cp 98 nodes 4926 nps 985200 tbhits 0 time 5 pv g5f6 d8f6 a1c1 f6g7 h2h4 e8g8 c3d5 b7b6
<< info depth 9 seldepth 13 multipv 1 score cp 47 nodes 15542 nps 1036133 tbhits 0 time 15 pv g5f6 d8f6 e2e1 c7c6 e1e5 f6e5 f3e5 f7f6 e5g4 e8g8
<< info depth 10 seldepth 13 multipv 1 score cp 64 nodes 30641 nps 988419 tbhits 0 time 31 pv h2h4 e8g8 e2d2 a7a5 a1e1 b8d7 c3d5 c7c6 d5f6 d7f6 b4b5 c6b5
<< info depth 11 seldepth 16 multipv 1 score cp 52 nodes 66422 nps 1443956 tbhits 0 time 46 pv h2h4 e8g8 e2d2 e6g5 h4g5 f6g7 a1e1 c8e6 c3d5 e6d5 c4d5 c7c6 d5c6 b8c6
<< info depth 12 seldepth 18 multipv 1 score cp 63 nodes 98046 nps 1054258 tbhits 0 time 93 pv g5f6 d8f6 e2e1 e8g8 c3d5 f6d8 e1c3 f7f6 h2h4 c7c6 h4h5 c6d5 h5g6 d5c4 c3c4
<< info depth 13 seldepth 20 multipv 1 score cp 72 nodes 153080 nps 1109275 tbhits 0 time 138 pv g5f6 d8f6 a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 e6f4 c3d5 f4d5 c4d5 c7c6 d5c6 b8c6 h4h5 f6f4 c1e1
<< info depth 14 seldepth 21 multipv 1 score cp 92 nodes 407862 nps 1014582 tbhits 0 time 402 pv g5f6 d8f6 a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 e6f4 c3d5 f4e2 d5f6 g8g7 f1e2 g7f6 e2d2 a7a5 h1e1 f8d8 f3g5 a5b4
<< info depth 15 seldepth 23 multipv 1 score cp 84 nodes 490882 nps 1033435 tbhits 0 time 475 pv g5f6 d8f6 a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 e6f4 c3d5 f4e2 d5f6 g8g7 d3e2 g7f6 h4h5 b8c6 b4b5 c6e7 h5g6 h7g6
<< info depth 16 seldepth 24 multipv 1 score cp 59 nodes 845850 nps 1078890 tbhits 0 time 784 pv g5f6 d8f6 a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 e6f4 c3d5 f4d5 c4d5 a7a5 h4h5 a5b4 h5g6 f7g6 c1c7 b4a3 d3c4 b8d7 e2e6 f6e6 d5e6
<< info depth 17 seldepth 25 multipv 1 score cp 91 nodes 2346190 nps 1151786 tbhits 0 time 2037 pv g5f6 d8f6 e2d2 e8g8 a1d1 f6f4 d2e1 b8d7 c3d5 f4h6 d5e7 g8h8 h2h4 d7f6 e1e5 h6f4 e7d5 f4e5 f3e5 f6d7 d1e1 c7c6
<< info nodes 3449779 time 3004
<< bestmove g5f6 ponder d8f6
move matched!!

rnb1k2r/ppp2p1p/4nqp1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/4QPPP/R4K1R w kq - fmvn 15; sm "e2d2"; c3 "Result 1-0"; c2 "So,W - Giri,A"; c1 "Round 1"; c0 "Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015"; hmvc 0;
>> isready
<< readyok
>> ucinewgame
>> position fen rnb1k2r/ppp2p1p/4nqp1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/4QPPP/R4K1R w kq - 0 15
>> go movetime 3000
<< info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp 117 nodes 74 nps 74000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv a1c1
<< info depth 2 seldepth 2 multipv 1 score cp 101 nodes 184 nps 184000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv e2e5 f6e5
<< info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 101 nodes 241 nps 241000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv e2e5 f6e5 f3e5
<< info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 82 nodes 310 nps 310000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv e2e5 f6e5 f3e5 e8g8
<< info depth 5 seldepth 5 multipv 1 score cp 67 nodes 966 nps 966000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 a7a5 b4b5
<< info depth 6 seldepth 6 multipv 1 score cp 37 nodes 2204 nps 2204000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv e2d2 e8g8 h2h4 f8d8 h4h5 e6f4
<< info depth 7 seldepth 8 multipv 1 score cp 49 nodes 4543 nps 4543000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv e2e5 f6e5 f3e5 e6f4 c3e2 f7f6 e2f4 f6e5
<< info depth 8 seldepth 9 multipv 1 score cp 29 nodes 5814 nps 363375 tbhits 0 time 16 pv e2e5 f6e5 f3e5 f7f6 e5g4 e8g8 h2h3 e6f4
<< info depth 9 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp 23 nodes 19835 nps 1239687 tbhits 0 time 16 pv a1c1 e8g8 e2e3 e6f4 c3d5 f4d5 c4d5 c7c6 h2h4 c6d5
<< info depth 10 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp 38 nodes 28458 nps 889312 tbhits 0 time 32 pv e2e1 e8g8 c3d5 f6d8 e1c3 f7f6 h2h4 c7c6 h4h5 c6d5 h5g6
<< info depth 11 seldepth 15 multipv 1 score cp 84 nodes 76934 nps 836239 tbhits 0 time 92 pv a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 c7c6 h4h5 e6f4 e2c2 f4d3 c2d3 c8f5 d3e3 f8d8 c3e4
<< info depth 12 seldepth 17 multipv 1 score cp 75 nodes 112851 nps 956364 tbhits 0 time 118 pv a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 c7c6 h4h5 e6f4 e2e3 f4d3 e3d3 c8f5 d3e3 b8d7 h5g6 f6g6 c1d1
<< info depth 13 seldepth 19 multipv 1 score cp 65 nodes 177111 nps 973137 tbhits 0 time 182 pv a1c1 e8g8 h2h4 c7c6 e2e3 f6f4 c1d1 f4e3 f2e3 a7a5 f1f2 a5b4 a3b4 f8d8
<< info depth 14 seldepth 19 multipv 1 score cp 82 nodes 412241 nps 1105203 tbhits 0 time 373 pv e2d2 e8g8 a1d1 f6f4 h2h4 f4d2 d1d2 a7a5 b4b5 b8d7 h4h5 d7b6 h5g6 f7g6 c3d5 b6d5 c4d5
<< info depth 15 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp 86 nodes 1335927 nps 1099528 tbhits 0 time 1215 pv e2d2 e8g8 h2h4 h7h5 a1e1 f6g7 c3d5 b8c6 d2e3 f8d8 f1g1 g8h8 g2g3 a7a5 g1g2 a5b4 a3b4
<< info depth 16 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp 85 nodes 2089484 nps 1116773 tbhits 0 time 1871 pv e2d2 e8g8 h2h4 c8d7 h4h5 d7c6 f3e1 a7a6 b4b5 a6b5 c4b5 c6d7 h5g6 f7g6 e1f3 f8d8 a1e1 a8a3 c3e4 f6g7 d3c4 d7b5
<< info depth 17 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp 84 nodes 2925860 nps 1117166 tbhits 0 time 2619 pv e2d2 e8g8 a1e1 f6d8 h2h4 e6f4 d3e4 d8d2 f3d2 a7a5 g2g3 a5b4 a3b4 f4e6 f1g2 f8d8 d2f3 b8d7 c3d5 c7c6 d5e7 g8g7
<< info nodes 3366348 time 3015
<< bestmove e2d2 ponder e8g8
move matched!!

rnb2rk1/ppp2p1p/4nqp1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/3Q1PPP/R4K1R w - - fmvn 16; sm "a1e1"; c3 "Result 1-0"; c2 "So,W - Giri,A"; c1 "Round 1"; c0 "Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015"; hmvc 2;
>> isready
<< readyok
>> ucinewgame
>> position fen rnb2rk1/ppp2p1p/4nqp1/8/1PP5/P1NB1N2/3Q1PPP/R4K1R w - - 2 16
>> go movetime 3000
<< info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp 61 nodes 50 nps 50000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4
<< info depth 2 seldepth 2 multipv 1 score cp 63 nodes 149 nps 149000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4 a7a6
<< info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 63 nodes 232 nps 232000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4 b7b6 b4b5
<< info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 50 nodes 480 nps 480000 tbhits 0 time 1 pv h2h4 a7a5 b4b5 b7b6
<< info depth 5 seldepth 6 multipv 1 score cp 668 nodes 1654 nps 97294 tbhits 0 time 17 pv a1e1 b8d7 c3e4 b7b6 e4f6 d7f6
<< info depth 6 seldepth 7 multipv 1 score cp 83 nodes 3056 nps 179764 tbhits 0 time 17 pv a1e1 f6f4 f1g1 c8d7 b4b5 f4d2 f3d2
<< info depth 7 seldepth 7 multipv 1 score cp 82 nodes 4726 nps 278000 tbhits 0 time 17 pv h2h4 a7a5 b4b5 e6f4 a1e1 b7b6 c3e4
<< info depth 8 seldepth 9 multipv 1 score cp 54 nodes 9060 nps 532941 tbhits 0 time 17 pv a1e1 e6d4 f3d4 f6d4 e1e4 d4f6 h2h4 c8f5
<< info depth 9 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp 79 nodes 17243 nps 538843 tbhits 0 time 32 pv a1e1 b8c6 c3d5 f6g7 h2h4 c6d4 f3d4 g7d4 h4h5
<< info depth 10 seldepth 13 multipv 1 score cp 72 nodes 27257 nps 851781 tbhits 0 time 32 pv a1e1 f6f4 d2d1 b8d7 c3d5 f4d6 h2h4 e6f4 d5f4 d6f4
<< info depth 11 seldepth 18 multipv 1 score cp 71 nodes 70936 nps 797033 tbhits 0 time 89 pv a1e1 f6d8 h2h4 a7a5 h4h5 e6f4 d2f4 d8d3 c3e2 b8c6 f4h4 g6h5 h4g5 d3g6
<< info depth 12 seldepth 19 multipv 1 score cp 78 nodes 272693 nps 1113032 tbhits 0 time 245 pv a1e1 f6d8 h2h4 e6f4 d2f4 d8d3 c3e2 b8c6 h4h5 c8f5 f4c7 a7a6 h5g6
<< info depth 13 seldepth 19 multipv 1 score cp 70 nodes 384457 nps 1082977 tbhits 0 time 355 pv a1e1 f6d8 h2h4 e6f4 d3e4 d8d2 f3d2 f8d8 d2b3 b8c6 b4b5 c6e7 g2g3 c8h3 f1g1 f4d3 e4b7 d3e1
<< info depth 14 seldepth 21 multipv 1 score cp 56 nodes 627727 nps 1099346 tbhits 0 time 571 pv a1e1 f6d8 h2h4 e6f4 d3e4 d8d2 f3d2 b8c6 d2f3 c8e6 c3d5 f4h5 f3g5 a8d8 b4b5 c6e5 g5e6 f7e6 d5c7
<< info depth 15 seldepth 25 multipv 1 score cp 91 nodes 1352361 nps 1180070 tbhits 0 time 1146 pv a1d1 a7a5 h2h4 f6f4 d2c2 c7c6 h4h5 a5b4 a3b4 f4h6 f1g1 g6h5 h1h3 e6f4 h3g3 c8g4 c3e4
<< info depth 16 seldepth 25 multipv 1 score cp 101 nodes 2058033 nps 1162730 tbhits 0 time 1770 pv a1d1 b8d7 h2h4 f6f4 d2b2 f4h6 g2g3 a7a5 f1g2 f8e8 h1e1 c7c6 b4b5 d7f6 b5c6 b7c6 e1e3 h6g7
<< info nodes 3354920 time 3001
<< bestmove a1e1 ponder b8d7
move matched!!

[...]

[Ferdy]

Using 2 Threads and 10sec/position. Now with win/loss/draw info too.

Code: Select all

Moves matches between Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT and players from
Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015, after round 2

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
id name Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT
Hash 128 MB, Threads 2, MoveTime 10000 ms
Analyses start at move 12 till end of game

MRank             Players  TotalPos  Right   RRate    W    L    D  Games  Score   SRate

    1                So,W        50     36   72.00%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    2           Carlsen,M        60     43   71.67%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    3           Kramnik,V        57     40   70.18%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    4           Caruana,F        92     58   63.04%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    5        Mamedyarov,S        96     57   59.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
    6         Mamedov,Rau        73     41   56.16%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    7   Vachier Lagrave,M        65     35   53.85%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    8             Anand,V        77     41   53.25%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    9            Adams,Mi        42     22   52.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
   10              Giri,A        65     34   52.31%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%

[Dann Corbit]

Using 2 Threads and 10sec/position. Now with win/loss/draw info too.

Code: Select all

Moves matches between Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT and players from
Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015, after round 2

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
id name Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT
Hash 128 MB, Threads 2, MoveTime 10000 ms
Analyses start at move 12 till end of game

MRank             Players  TotalPos  Right   RRate    W    L    D  Games  Score   SRate

    1                So,W        50     36   72.00%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    2           Carlsen,M        60     43   71.67%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    3           Kramnik,V        57     40   70.18%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    4           Caruana,F        92     58   63.04%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    5        Mamedyarov,S        96     57   59.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
    6         Mamedov,Rau        73     41   56.16%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    7   Vachier Lagrave,M        65     35   53.85%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    8             Anand,V        77     41   53.25%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    9            Adams,Mi        42     22   52.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
   10              Giri,A        65     34   52.31%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%

It would be amusing to see if some of the other greats in this list have a better fit to another program like Houdini or Komodo.

I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).

They may not have had the opening theory way back in the day, but some of those guys could sure make strong moves.

[Ferdy]

It would be amusing to see if some of the other greats in this list have a better fit to another program like Houdini or Komodo.

I will try H4 later. I will also include the average depth reached by the engine in the summary.

I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).

They may not have had the opening theory way back in the day, but some of those guys could sure make strong moves.

It is indeed interesting to see the result for those old games. Amazing games by Eichborn, I may try this one also later.

I am also concern of the time control used, I am planning of analyzing only the moves from move 12 to 40, a phase where probably most players are not too affected with time pressure granting we know the time control. Another limit to introduce is do not compare when the position is already lossing/wining by some margin say -/+ 10 pawns according to engine. For humans a +5 pawns could still be complicated although winning but requires precise move sequence. Could you suggest a reasonable margin for this?

[Dann Corbit]

It would be amusing to see if some of the other greats in this list have a better fit to another program like Houdini or Komodo.

I will try H4 later. I will also include the average depth reached by the engine in the summary.

I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).

They may not have had the opening theory way back in the day, but some of those guys could sure make strong moves.

It is indeed interesting to see the result for those old games. Amazing games by Eichborn, I may try this one also later.

I am also concern of the time control used, I am planning of analyzing only the moves from move 12 to 40, a phase where probably most players are not too affected with time pressure granting we know the time control. Another limit to introduce is do not compare when the position is already lossing/wining by some margin say -/+ 10 pawns according to engine. For humans a +5 pawns could still be complicated although winning but requires precise move sequence. Could you suggest a reasonable margin for this?

Personally, I analyzed everything from the very first move to the last.
Some of the most amazing things were perfect moves out 20 plies or more from mate.

I have a lot of compute horsepower at my disposal (I need it too, there are more than 20,000 distinct moves made by Morphy in his recorded games).

I think that every distinct experiment can tell us something new.
I do a pass over all the positions at fast time control. This weeds out all the short mating sequences from further analysis, after I verify the moves are perfect with Chest319. Then I increase the time for the very polar positions (eg scores over 1000 centipawns) because these often quickly convert into checkmates as well. Deeper mates can be verified with ChestUCI. It only runs a single thread, but that is good and bad. It also means that you can start perhaps 12 instances on one machine with 12 cores. Many of the common positions I will already have analzyed between 35 and 50 plies so I don't really have to bother with them. But then the middle ground takes the long, slogging plow.
Sometimes, one position may take an hour to reach 35 plies because it is difficult. Multiply that by thousands and it can get to be a big task depending on how complicated the positions are. Some positions will also resolve in a minute, so you never know.

Eventually, I would like to analyze every GM move every played. Since the GMs are not likely to stop playing, I will have something to keep me busy for a long time.

[Ferdy]

It would be amusing to see if some of the other greats in this list have a better fit to another program like Houdini or Komodo.

I will try H4 later. I will also include the average depth reached by the engine in the summary.

I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).

They may not have had the opening theory way back in the day, but some of those guys could sure make strong moves.

It is indeed interesting to see the result for those old games. Amazing games by Eichborn, I may try this one also later.

I am also concern of the time control used, I am planning of analyzing only the moves from move 12 to 40, a phase where probably most players are not too affected with time pressure granting we know the time control. Another limit to introduce is do not compare when the position is already lossing/wining by some margin say -/+ 10 pawns according to engine. For humans a +5 pawns could still be complicated although winning but requires precise move sequence. Could you suggest a reasonable margin for this?

Personally, I analyzed everything from the very first move to the last.
Some of the most amazing things were perfect moves out 20 plies or more from mate.

I have a lot of compute horsepower at my disposal (I need it too, there are more than 20,000 distinct moves made by Morphy in his recorded games).

I think that every distinct experiment can tell us something new.
I do a pass over all the positions at fast time control. This weeds out all the short mating sequences from further analysis, after I verify the moves are perfect with Chest319. Then I increase the time for the very polar positions (eg scores over 1000 centipawns) because these often quickly convert into checkmates as well. Deeper mates can be verified with ChestUCI. It only runs a single thread, but that is good and bad. It also means that you can start perhaps 12 instances on one machine with 12 cores. Many of the common positions I will already have analzyed between 35 and 50 plies so I don't really have to bother with them. But then the middle ground takes the long, slogging plow.
Sometimes, one position may take an hour to reach 35 plies because it is difficult. Multiply that by thousands and it can get to be a big task depending on how complicated the positions are. Some positions will also resolve in a minute, so you never know.

Eventually, I would like to analyze every GM move every played. Since the GMs are not likely to stop playing, I will have something to keep me busy for a long time.

The reason I start at 12th move is because I try to discount home prepared moves. It should be something that the human has spent time thinking on the position, that should be compared to the best move searched by the engine. Although there are positions before move 12 that humans were already spending time analyzing the position.
I use pgn file from TWIC and there is no time stamp on the games. It would be interesting if you know the time remaining of every position. Say once the time remaining is already low say less than 5 minutes it is not included in the calculation of matching moves, we only try to measure when the players are not time pressured.

One thing I observed is that depending on position and engine, analysis depth may take longer, of course there are engines that search deeper, why not use another condition say max time limit?

Wait... I got a a game with time stamp from chessbase this is more interesting, I will be able to calculate the remaining time per position, detecting a possible time pressure.

[Guenther]

...
I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).
...

You mean the Eichborn (Louis) whose ficticious games were made up by CB? It is not even sure the person did exist in reality and his personality
is just a fiction but gratefully accepted by the internet after all informations where gone?

Guenther

[Dann Corbit]

...
I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).
...

You mean the Eichborn (Louis) whose ficticious games were made up by CB? It is not even sure the person did exist in reality and his personality
is just a fiction but gratefully accepted by the internet after all informations where gone?

Guenther

I saw some of his game scores in very old books. So if CB did make him up, then they also own a Tardis and are friends with Dr. Who.

[Guenther]

...
I am doing a study on Paul Morphy right now. At current depths (probably 30 plies average) there is a 55% hit rate with Stockfish move choice {at that depth}. About the same as Eichborn (but I eventually analyzed Eichborn to about 35 plies and I am not there with Morphy yet).
...

You mean the Eichborn (Louis) whose ficticious games were made up by CB? It is not even sure the person did exist in reality and his personality
is just a fiction but gratefully accepted by the internet after all informations where gone?

Guenther

I saw some of his game scores in very old books. So if CB did make him up, then they also own a Tardis and are friends with Dr. Who.

We (members of the German CSS forum) had a discussion about this in 1999 or 2000 after I discovered the fishy game score of a completely unknown Eichborn
in a newly released CB database and several people asked CB about the sources and the conclusion was it was just one of CBs usual easter eggs/jokes.
IIRC those 'games' did NOT appear before a certain annual Megabase appearance.
There was no dementi and never had been shown sources. You sure noticed that all internet quotes/sources about that 'Louis Eichborn games' are all:

1. after 2005 or later
2. all citing each other

I would not be surprised if the moves after a certain opening stage match
Fritz 5 or Fritz 6 to 99% ;-)

Guenther

[Ferdy]

Using 2 Threads and 10sec/position. Now with win/loss/draw info too.

Code: Select all

Moves matches between Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT and players from
Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015, after round 2

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
id name Stockfish 6 64 POPCNT
Hash 128 MB, Threads 2, MoveTime 10000 ms
Analyses start at move 12 till end of game

MRank             Players  TotalPos  Right   RRate    W    L    D  Games  Score   SRate

    1                So,W        50     36   72.00%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    2           Carlsen,M        60     43   71.67%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    3           Kramnik,V        57     40   70.18%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    4           Caruana,F        92     58   63.04%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    5        Mamedyarov,S        96     57   59.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
    6         Mamedov,Rau        73     41   56.16%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    7   Vachier Lagrave,M        65     35   53.85%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    8             Anand,V        77     41   53.25%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    9            Adams,Mi        42     22   52.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
   10              Giri,A        65     34   52.31%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%

It would be amusing to see if some of the other greats in this list have a better fit to another program like Houdini or Komodo.

From Houdini 4, also engine average depth is added.

Code: Select all

Moves matches between Houdini 4 x64 and players from
Event Vugar Gashimov Mem 2015, after round 2

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
Engine id name Houdini 4 x64
Hash 128 MB, Threads 2, MoveTime 10.0 sec/pos
Analyses start at move 12 till end of game

MRank             Players  AveDepth  TotalPos  Match   MRate    W    L    D  Games  Score   SRate

    1           Carlsen,M        21        60     45   75.00%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    2                So,W        20        50     34   68.00%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    3         Mamedov,Rau        20        73     44   60.27%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    4        Mamedyarov,S        22        96     57   59.38%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
    5   Vachier Lagrave,M        21        65     38   58.46%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    6           Kramnik,V        20        57     33   57.89%   1,   0,   1      2    1.5    75.0%
    7           Caruana,F        22        92     50   54.35%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
    8              Giri,A        19        65     35   53.85%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%
    9             Anand,V        21        77     41   53.25%   0,   0,   2      2    1.0    50.0%
   10            Adams,Mi        19        42     20   47.62%   0,   1,   1      2    0.5    25.0%

Legend:
MRank    - ranking based on most number of matching engine moves
AveDepth - average depth reached by the engine in analyzing those positions
Match    - the number of matching or same move between the engine and human