FIDE World Chess Championship thread

[ZirconiumX]

It is astonishing that the match ended without Anand winning a single game. This has never happened before in a world championship, as far as I know.

I was a bit disappointed with the 12-game format - I hope in future FIDE will consider a somewhat longer match.

--Jon

Capablanca beat Lasker w/o any defeat, Kramnik to Kasparov, and Lasker did it too, but I do not remember to whom now, but he was the defending champ.
Very clear victory. MC played like a computer, not making blunders, and allowing Anand to self destruct. An extremely boring match, that will leave very little to remember, from the chess point of view.
Miguel

why do you think 43.Nd6 is not a blunder?

Why should be? at minimum it secured a draw and a WC.

Miguel

+2.81++ 43.Nd2

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -

why should it be? because if you play it out with a strong program with strong hardware the score increases with each move if you play bm for both sides.

no not true, it did not secure a draw, blunders by both humans secured the draw.
no not true it did not secure a WC, blunders by Anand allowed the human opponent to secure the WC.
kgburcham

That is not blunder. A blunder is a horrible and stupid mistake. Even if Nd2 wins and Nd6 does not, still not a blunder. No seeing a win 30 plies ahead is not a blunder by any stretch of the definition. If that is a blunder, it should be explained in few words. Why do you think it is a blunder?
Miguel

not a blunder to you, I am ok with that.
to me it seems a blunder when a 2800 GM misses a 2 or 3 point move.
most of the time a two point move would be a loss against a program but against a human it might hold with opponents errors.
the fact is the 2800 human could not see the advantage, they are limited.
kgburcham

Houdini3 also does not see the advantage with Nd2 so I see no reason to insult humans who did not see it.

there are clearly better example for blunders but for some reason you do not choose positions when all top programs can find the right move in less than 0.1 seconds and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad and carlsen missed a win in the same game by 30.exd6
that I expect even myself to avoid in a game(I can explain it by the fact that carlsen cared first not to lose so did not search for a better move after being sure that 30.exd6 is not losing) but for some reason you do not choose this move as a blunder but the mistake that it is hard to find
when houdni3 tactical fails to find it even after more than 70,000,000,000 nodes and houdini3 not tactical fails to find it after more than 4,000,000,000 nodes

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Komodo4 sees this quickly, but takes a while to see the advantage of it.

Matthew:out

[kgburcham]

It is astonishing that the match ended without Anand winning a single game. This has never happened before in a world championship, as far as I know.

I was a bit disappointed with the 12-game format - I hope in future FIDE will consider a somewhat longer match.

--Jon

Capablanca beat Lasker w/o any defeat, Kramnik to Kasparov, and Lasker did it too, but I do not remember to whom now, but he was the defending champ.
Very clear victory. MC played like a computer, not making blunders, and allowing Anand to self destruct. An extremely boring match, that will leave very little to remember, from the chess point of view.
Miguel

why do you think 43.Nd6 is not a blunder?

Why should be? at minimum it secured a draw and a WC.

Miguel

+2.81++ 43.Nd2

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -

why should it be? because if you play it out with a strong program with strong hardware the score increases with each move if you play bm for both sides.

no not true, it did not secure a draw, blunders by both humans secured the draw.
no not true it did not secure a WC, blunders by Anand allowed the human opponent to secure the WC.
kgburcham

That is not blunder. A blunder is a horrible and stupid mistake. Even if Nd2 wins and Nd6 does not, still not a blunder. No seeing a win 30 plies ahead is not a blunder by any stretch of the definition. If that is a blunder, it should be explained in few words. Why do you think it is a blunder?
Miguel

not a blunder to you, I am ok with that.
to me it seems a blunder when a 2800 GM misses a 2 or 3 point move.
most of the time a two point move would be a loss against a program but against a human it might hold with opponents errors.
the fact is the 2800 human could not see the advantage, they are limited.
kgburcham

Houdini3 also does not see the advantage with Nd2 so I see no reason to insult humans who did not see it.

there are clearly better example for blunders but for some reason you do not choose positions when all top programs can find the right move in less than 0.1 seconds and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad and carlsen missed a win in the same game by 30.exd6
that I expect even myself to avoid in a game(I can explain it by the fact that carlsen cared first not to lose so did not search for a better move after being sure that 30.exd6 is not losing) but for some reason you do not choose this move as a blunder but the mistake that it is hard to find
when houdni3 tactical fails to find it even after more than 70,000,000,000 nodes and houdini3 not tactical fails to find it after more than 4,000,000,000 nodes

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Houdini struggles with Nd2, just like the human.
best to try a different program.
kgburcham

[Terry McCracken]

It is astonishing that the match ended without Anand winning a single game. This has never happened before in a world championship, as far as I know.

I was a bit disappointed with the 12-game format - I hope in future FIDE will consider a somewhat longer match.

--Jon

Capablanca beat Lasker w/o any defeat, Kramnik to Kasparov, and Lasker did it too, but I do not remember to whom now, but he was the defending champ.
Very clear victory. MC played like a computer, not making blunders, and allowing Anand to self destruct. An extremely boring match, that will leave very little to remember, from the chess point of view.
Miguel

why do you think 43.Nd6 is not a blunder?

Why should be? at minimum it secured a draw and a WC.

Miguel

+2.81++ 43.Nd2

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -

why should it be? because if you play it out with a strong program with strong hardware the score increases with each move if you play bm for both sides.

no not true, it did not secure a draw, blunders by both humans secured the draw.
no not true it did not secure a WC, blunders by Anand allowed the human opponent to secure the WC.
kgburcham

That is not blunder. A blunder is a horrible and stupid mistake. Even if Nd2 wins and Nd6 does not, still not a blunder. No seeing a win 30 plies ahead is not a blunder by any stretch of the definition. If that is a blunder, it should be explained in few words. Why do you think it is a blunder?
Miguel

not a blunder to you, I am ok with that.
to me it seems a blunder when a 2800 GM misses a 2 or 3 point move.
most of the time a two point move would be a loss against a program but against a human it might hold with opponents errors.
the fact is the 2800 human could not see the advantage, they are limited.
kgburcham

Houdini3 also does not see the advantage with Nd2 so I see no reason to insult humans who did not see it.

there are clearly better example for blunders but for some reason you do not choose positions when all top programs can find the right move in less than 0.1 seconds and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad and carlsen missed a win in the same game by 30.exd6
that I expect even myself to avoid in a game(I can explain it by the fact that carlsen cared first not to lose so did not search for a better move after being sure that 30.exd6 is not losing) but for some reason you do not choose this move as a blunder but the mistake that it is hard to find
when houdni3 tactical fails to find it even after more than 70,000,000,000 nodes and houdini3 not tactical fails to find it after more than 4,000,000,000 nodes

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Houdini struggles with Nd2, just like the human.
best to try a different program.
kgburcham

I was surprised he didn't play it. The last game showed too many inaccuracies both from Carlsen and Anand. Anand's glaring Qg5?! and Carlsen's pawn capture on d6.

[kgburcham]

Houdini3 also does not see the advantage with Nd2 so I see no reason to insult humans who did not see it.

I don't consider it an insult to analyze the 2800 games, if there are blunders, then it is good to know why, what was better move etc..

there are clearly better example for blunders but for some reason you do not choose positions when all top programs can find the right move in less than 0.1 seconds

It takes a lot of energy and motivation to run a position or check a line using my methods. I did see the other blunders. I did see the scores, but to be sure, it takes time. so I have just talked about one blunder.

Yes I saw these before, of course there are others:

28.Qg5
30.exd6

[d] 2r1n1k1/1p1r1pp1/p2pp2p/P3P1q1/2PR4/1P2R2P/3QNPP1/6K1 w - -

Program move +2.42 30.Nc3
2800 human move +.28 30.exd6

and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad

this is not what I read. several moves the GM were saying, What was that?, What does that mean? What is the purpose of that? and others would ask the GMs, what happened and they would answer, I don't know.

and carlsen missed a win in the same game by 30.exd6
that I expect even myself to avoid in a game(I can explain it by the fact that carlsen cared first not to lose so did not search for a better move after being sure that 30.exd6 is not losing) but for some reason you do not choose this move as a blunder but the mistake that it is hard to find

answered above

when houdni3 tactical fails to find it even after more than 70,000,000,000 nodes and houdini3 not tactical fails to find it after more than 4,000,000,000 nodes

Houdini struggles with Nd2

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Note it is spelled reproducible
Note I do not need reproducible to determine bm for 2800 games.
Note that I prefer 12 cores with HT off, 8192 hash, and I use min 4 programs.
Also I do not stick with default settings

best to you
kgburcham

[kgburcham]

It is astonishing that the match ended without Anand winning a single game. This has never happened before in a world championship, as far as I know.

I was a bit disappointed with the 12-game format - I hope in future FIDE will consider a somewhat longer match.

--Jon

Capablanca beat Lasker w/o any defeat, Kramnik to Kasparov, and Lasker did it too, but I do not remember to whom now, but he was the defending champ.
Very clear victory. MC played like a computer, not making blunders, and allowing Anand to self destruct. An extremely boring match, that will leave very little to remember, from the chess point of view.
Miguel

why do you think 43.Nd6 is not a blunder?

Why should be? at minimum it secured a draw and a WC.

Miguel

+2.81++ 43.Nd2

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -

why should it be? because if you play it out with a strong program with strong hardware the score increases with each move if you play bm for both sides.

no not true, it did not secure a draw, blunders by both humans secured the draw.
no not true it did not secure a WC, blunders by Anand allowed the human opponent to secure the WC.
kgburcham

That is not blunder. A blunder is a horrible and stupid mistake. Even if Nd2 wins and Nd6 does not, still not a blunder. No seeing a win 30 plies ahead is not a blunder by any stretch of the definition. If that is a blunder, it should be explained in few words. Why do you think it is a blunder?
Miguel

not a blunder to you, I am ok with that.
to me it seems a blunder when a 2800 GM misses a 2 or 3 point move.
most of the time a two point move would be a loss against a program but against a human it might hold with opponents errors.
the fact is the 2800 human could not see the advantage, they are limited.
kgburcham

Houdini3 also does not see the advantage with Nd2 so I see no reason to insult humans who did not see it.

there are clearly better example for blunders but for some reason you do not choose positions when all top programs can find the right move in less than 0.1 seconds and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad and carlsen missed a win in the same game by 30.exd6
that I expect even myself to avoid in a game(I can explain it by the fact that carlsen cared first not to lose so did not search for a better move after being sure that 30.exd6 is not losing) but for some reason you do not choose this move as a blunder but the mistake that it is hard to find
when houdni3 tactical fails to find it even after more than 70,000,000,000 nodes and houdini3 not tactical fails to find it after more than 4,000,000,000 nodes

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Houdini struggles with Nd2, just like the human.
best to try a different program.
kgburcham

I was surprised he didn't play it. The last game showed too many inaccuracies both from Carlsen and Anand. Anand's glaring Qg5?! and Carlsen's pawn capture on d6.

That is what I am not sure of Terry.
I wish it would be discussed more here and that is speculation of what the GM was thinking,
what his motivation was for the move he chose,
why he could not see the bm,
why the blunder, etc.
right or wrong, I find the explanation very interesting.
all of this other silly, "you are offending my hero stuff" is childish.
I want lots of technical speculation of why the GM played a line or move, so I can understand more of the GM mind.
I did not go back and count the total number of blunders in the match, but it was several from both sides. I think Anand made an 8 point blunder---forgot not sure, I would have to recheck.
2800 GM blunders are amazing.
best to you
kgburcham

[Uri Blass]

It is astonishing that the match ended without Anand winning a single game. This has never happened before in a world championship, as far as I know.

I was a bit disappointed with the 12-game format - I hope in future FIDE will consider a somewhat longer match.

--Jon

Capablanca beat Lasker w/o any defeat, Kramnik to Kasparov, and Lasker did it too, but I do not remember to whom now, but he was the defending champ.
Very clear victory. MC played like a computer, not making blunders, and allowing Anand to self destruct. An extremely boring match, that will leave very little to remember, from the chess point of view.
Miguel

why do you think 43.Nd6 is not a blunder?

Why should be? at minimum it secured a draw and a WC.

Miguel

+2.81++ 43.Nd2

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -

why should it be? because if you play it out with a strong program with strong hardware the score increases with each move if you play bm for both sides.

no not true, it did not secure a draw, blunders by both humans secured the draw.
no not true it did not secure a WC, blunders by Anand allowed the human opponent to secure the WC.
kgburcham

That is not blunder. A blunder is a horrible and stupid mistake. Even if Nd2 wins and Nd6 does not, still not a blunder. No seeing a win 30 plies ahead is not a blunder by any stretch of the definition. If that is a blunder, it should be explained in few words. Why do you think it is a blunder?
Miguel

not a blunder to you, I am ok with that.
to me it seems a blunder when a 2800 GM misses a 2 or 3 point move.
most of the time a two point move would be a loss against a program but against a human it might hold with opponents errors.
the fact is the 2800 human could not see the advantage, they are limited.
kgburcham

Houdini3 also does not see the advantage with Nd2 so I see no reason to insult humans who did not see it.

there are clearly better example for blunders but for some reason you do not choose positions when all top programs can find the right move in less than 0.1 seconds and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad and carlsen missed a win in the same game by 30.exd6
that I expect even myself to avoid in a game(I can explain it by the fact that carlsen cared first not to lose so did not search for a better move after being sure that 30.exd6 is not losing) but for some reason you do not choose this move as a blunder but the mistake that it is hard to find
when houdni3 tactical fails to find it even after more than 70,000,000,000 nodes and houdini3 not tactical fails to find it after more than 4,000,000,000 nodes

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Houdini struggles with Nd2, just like the human.
best to try a different program.
kgburcham

I know that stockfish has no problem to find Nd2.
My point is that if a move is a blunder then
I expect every top program to find the right move with a high score very fast.

I find your claim that the "blunders" should carry an extra penalty to be offending because it means that all human chess players should get lower rating and it seems that you hate human chess players.

I see no reason that my rating should go down when my playing strength does not get worse and I see no reason to reduce the rating of houdini only because it makes blunders based on your words.

If houdini fails to find the right move in games then it means
lower rating by losing or not winning the relevant game and there is no need for some extra penalty.

Uri

[JuLieN]

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -
Ok, I stop the search at depth 55 (unfinished iteration) and more than 515 billions nodes computed:

Code: Select all

16:08.20 1.Nd2 (profondeur 55, 1/11), 515,3G positions (8,8M pos/sec)
0.00: +0.66/3 1.Nd6 g5 2.h4 gxh4 3.gxh4
0.00: +0.78/4 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Kc7
0.00: +0.64/5 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Kc7 4.Kd4 gxf4 5.gxf4
0.00: +0.60/6 1.Nd2 g5 2.Nf3 gxf4 3.gxf4 h5
0.00: 0.00/7 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Nf3 f4 4.h4 fxg3 5.hxg5
0.00: +0.42/8 1.Kd4 Nxc4 2.bxc4 fxe4 3.Kxe4 Kd6 4.Kd4 g6 5.c5+ Kc6
0.00: +0.70/9 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Nf3 g4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Nd4
0.00: +0.62/10 1.Nd6 Nf1 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nxg7 Nxg3 4.Kb6 Ne2 5.Kxb7 Nxf4 6.Kxa6 Nxh3
0.00: +0.38/11 1.Kd4 Nxc4 2.bxc4 fxe4 3.Kxe4 Kd6 4.Kd4 Kd7 5.h4 g6 6.g4
0.00: +0.36/12 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.Ne3 Ne4 6.Ke5 g6 7.g4
0.00: +0.48/13 1.Kd4 Nxc4 2.Kxc4 fxe4 3.Kd4 e3 4.Kxe3 Kd6 5.Ke4 g6 6.b4 Kc6 7.Ke5 Kb5 8.Kxe6 Kxb4 9.Kf6
0.00: +0.54/14 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Nf7 Kd7 6.Kd4 e5+ 7.Kd5 e4 8.Kxe4 Nf2+ 9.Kd4
0.00: +0.58/15 1.Nd6 g6 2.Ne8+ Kd8 3.Nf6 Nf1 4.Kb6 Kc8 5.Ne8 Kd7 6.Nc7 Nd2 7.b4 Kc8 8.Nxe6 Nxc4+ 9.Kc5 Nd2 10.g4 h5 11.gxh5 Ne4+ 12.Kd5 gxh5
0.00: +0.58/16 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.b4 Nxh3 4.Nb3 Nf2 5.Nc5 g6 6.Ke5 Kc6 7.Kxe6 Ne4 8.Nd3 Nxg3 9.Ne5+ Kc7 10.Nxg6 Ne4 11.Kxf5 Nd6+ 12.Ke5 Nxc4+ 13.Ke4
0.00: +0.98/17 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.Kd3 Nc6 9.Nxe6+ Kd6 10.Nd4 Nxa5 11.b4
0.00: +0.64/18 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.b4 Nc6+ 9.Kc5 e5 10.Ne4 Kd7 11.Kb6 Nxb4 12.Kxb7 Ke7 13.c5
0.00: +0.64/19 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.b4 Nc6+ 9.Kc5 e5 10.Ne4 Kd7 11.Kb6 Nxb4 12.Kxb7 Ke7 13.c5
0.00: +0.80/20 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.b4 Nc6+ 9.Kc5 e5 10.Ne4 Kd7 11.Kb6 Nxb4 12.Kxb7 Ke7 13.c5 Kd7 14.Kb6
0.00: +0.60/21 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Ke3 Na2 10.b5 axb5 11.cxb5 Nc3 12.b6+ Kc6 13.Kd3 Nb5 14.Ke4 Nd6+ 15.Kxe5 Nc4+ 16.Kd4 Nxb6
0.01: +0.56/22 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Kd5 Na2 10.Kc5 Nc1 11.Ne6+ Kc8 12.b5 Nb3+ 13.Kb4 Nd4 14.Nc5 Kc7 15.bxa6
0.01: +0.66/23 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Kd5 Na2 10.Kc5 Nc1 11.Ne6+ Kc8 12.b5 Nb3+ 13.Kd5 Nxa5 14.bxa6 bxa6 15.c5 Kd7 16.Kxe5 Nc4+ 17.Kd5 Ne3+ 18.Ke5
0.01: +0.78/24 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Kd5 Na2 10.Kc5 Nc1 11.Ne6+ Kc8 12.b5 Kd7 13.bxa6 bxa6 14.Ng5 Kc7 15.Kd5 Nb3 16.Nf3 Nxa5 17.c5
0.02: +0.78/25 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Ne5 Ne2+ 11.Ke3 Ng3 12.Nd3 Kc6 13.Kf3 Nf5 14.Kf4 Nd6 15.Ne5+ Kc7 16.c5 Nf5 17.Nd3 Kd7 18.Ke4 Ke7 19.Ne5 Ng3+ 20.Kd4 Ne2+ 21.Kc4 Nf4 22.c6 bxc6 23.Nxc6+ Kd6 24.Nb8
0.02: +0.70/26 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Ne5 Ne2+ 11.Ke3 Ng3 12.Nd3 Kc6 13.Kf3 Nf5 14.Kf4 Nd6 15.Ne5+ Kc7 16.c5 Nf5 17.Ke4 Ng3+ 18.Kd3 Nf5 19.Kc4 Ne3+ 20.Kd3 Nd5
0.03: +0.70/27 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Ne5 Ne2+ 11.Ke3 Ng3 12.Nd3 Kc6 13.Kf3 Nf5 14.Kf4 Nd6 15.Ne5+ Kc7 16.c5 Nf5 17.Ke4 Ng3+ 18.Kd3 Nf5 19.Kc4 Ne3+ 20.Kd4 Nd5 21.Kc4 Nf4
0.04: +0.75/28 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Kc3 Ne2+ 11.Kd3 Nc1+ 12.Kd2 Nb3+ 13.Kc3 Nc1 14.Kd4 Na2 15.b5 Nc1 16.bxa6 bxa6 17.Ng5 Nb3+ 18.Ke5 Nxa5 19.Nxe6+ Kc6 20.Kd4 Nb3+ 21.Kc3 Nc1
0.05: +0.74/29 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Kc3 Ne2+ 11.Kd3 Nc1+ 12.Kd4 Ne2+ 13.Ke4 Kd7 14.Ng5 Kd6 15.Ke3 Ng3 16.Ne4+ Nxe4 17.Kxe4 Kd7 18.Ke5 Ke7 19.Kd4 Kd6 20.Ke4
0.08: +0.66/30 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Kc3 Kd7 11.Kd2 Nb3+ 12.Kd3 Ke7 13.Ne5 Kd6 14.Ke4 Nd2+ 15.Kf4 Nb3 16.Nf3 Nc1 17.Ke3 Na2 18.b5 Kc5
0.16: +0.86/31 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Ke7 4.Nh5 Kf7 5.Kb6 Kg6 6.Kxb7 Kxh5 7.Kxa6 gxf4 8.gxf4 e5 9.Kb5 exf4 10.a6 f3 11.a7 f2 12.a8=Q f1=Q 13.Qe8+ Kg5 14.Qxe3+ f4 15.Qe7+ Kf5 16.Qh7+ Kg5 17.Qg8+ Kf6 18.Qf8+ Kg6 19.Qd6+ Kf5 20.Qd5+ Kf6 21.Qd2 f3 22.b4 Qxh3 23.Qd4+ Ke6 24.Qe3+ Kf5 25.c5 Qf1+ 26.Kb6 f2
0.19: +0.78/32 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Ke7 4.Nh5 Kf7 5.Kb6 Kg6 6.Kxb7 Kxh5 7.Kxa6 gxf4 8.gxf4 e5 9.Kb5 exf4 10.a6 f3 11.a7 f2 12.a8=Q f1=Q 13.Qe8+ Kg5 14.Qxe3+ f4 15.Qe7+ Kf5 16.Qh7+ Kg5 17.Qg8+ Kf5 18.Qd5+ Kf6 19.Qd4+ Kf5 20.Qd7+ Ke4 21.Qd5+ Ke3 22.Qe6+ Kd4 23.Qf6+ Ke4 24.Qh4 Kf5 25.Qxh6 f3 26.Qf8+ Ke4 27.b4 f2 28.Qe7+ Kf3 29.Qf7+ Kg3
0.29: +0.94/33 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Ke7 4.Nh5 Kd7 5.b4 gxf4 6.gxf4 Ng2 7.Kb6 Kc8 8.b5 Ne3 9.bxa6 bxa6 10.c5 Kd7 11.Nf6+ Ke7 12.Ng8+ Kd7 13.Nxh6 Nc4+ 14.Kxa6 Kc6 15.Nf7 Kxc5 16.Nd8 Kb4
0.44: +0.80/33 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Na2 12.b5 Nb4 13.Kd4 Kd6 14.c5+ Kc7 15.gxh6 gxh6 16.b6+ Kc8 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.c6 Nxf4 19.cxb7+ Kb8 20.Nd7+ Kxb7 21.Nc5+ Kc6 22.Nxa6
0.50: +0.88/34 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Kc7 4.Kd4 Nf1 5.Ke5 gxf4 6.gxf4 Nd2 7.b4 Nxc4+ 8.Kxe6 Ne3 9.Ng8 h5 10.Ne7 Nc2 11.Nxf5 Nxb4 12.Ng7 Nc6 13.f5 Nxa5 14.f6 Nc6 15.Ne8+ Kc8 16.Nd6+ Kc7 17.f7 Nd8+ 18.Kd5 Nxf7 19.Nxf7
0.52: +0.80/34 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Na2 12.b5 Nb4 13.Kd4 Kd6 14.c5+ Kc7 15.gxh6 gxh6 16.b6+ Kc8 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.c6 Nxf4 19.cxb7+ Kb8 20.Nd7+ Kxb7
1.00: +0.88/35 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Na2 12.b5 Nb4 13.Kd4 Kd6 14.c5+ Kc7 15.gxh6 gxh6 16.b6+ Kc8 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.c6 Nxf4 19.cxb7+ Kxb7 20.Nd7 Kc6 21.Nc5 Ne2+ 22.Kc4
1.11: +0.80/36 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Kd6 12.Ne5 h5 13.Kd2 Nb3+ 14.Kd3 Nc1+ 15.Ke3 Nb3 16.Nf7+ Ke7 17.g6 Nc1 18.Ng5 Nb3 19.c5 Nc1 20.Nf7 Na2
1.42: +1.11/37 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Ng3 13.Ne5+ Kd6 14.Ng6 Ne4 15.Kd4 Kd7 16.Ne5+ Ke7 17.c5 Ng3 18.c6 bxc6 19.Nxc6+ Kd6 20.Nb8 Ne2+ 21.Ke3 Nc3 22.Nxa6 Nd5+ 23.Kf3 e5 24.fxe5+ Kxe5 25.b5
2.05: +1.16/38 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Nh4 Ng3 14.Ng6 Ne4 15.Kd4 Kd7 16.c5 Nf2 17.Ne5+ Kc7 18.Ng6 Kd7
2.28: +1.08/39 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Nf2+ 14.Ke3 Ng4+ 15.Nxg4 fxg4 16.Kf2 e5 17.Kg3 exf4+ 18.Kxf4 g6 19.Kxg4 Ke5 20.b5 Kd4 21.bxa6 bxa6 22.Kf4
3.01: +1.08/40 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Nf2+ 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc6 18.Ke3
3.30: +1.08/41 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Nf2+ 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc6 18.Ke3
4.15: +1.08/42 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Ng3 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc7 18.Kd4 Kd6 19.Ne5
5.03: +1.08/43 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Ng3 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc7 18.Kd4 Kd6 19.Ne5
6.20: +1.08/44 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Ng3 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc7
13.29: +1.41/45 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 e5 12.Ke3 Nd6 13.fxe5 Nxc4+ 14.Kf4 g6 15.Nf3 Nb2 16.Ke3 Nd1+ 17.Kd4 Nf2 18.Kd5 Kd7 19.Nh4 Nh3 20.Nxg6 Nxg5 21.Nf4 Ke7 22.e6 Nf3 23.Ng6+ Kf6 24.e7 Kf7 25.Kd6 Ke8 26.Kc7 f4 27.Kb6
23.36: +1.39/46 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Nd6 12.Nf3 Nc8 13.Nd4 Kd6 14.b5 axb5 15.cxb5 Kd5 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Na7 18.Ke3 Kd6 19.Ke2 Kd5 20.Kd3 Nc8 21.Nb5 e5 22.Ke3 Kc6 23.a7 Nb6 24.Nc3 exf4+ 25.Kxf4 g6 26.Ke5 Kb7 27.Kf6 f4 28.Kxg6
1:08.29: +2.50/47 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Ne3 10.h5 Kf8 11.Kxe6 Nxc4 12.Nf5 b5 13.Kf6 g3 14.Nxg3 Ne3 15.h6 Kg8 16.Kg6 Nd5
1:23.32: +2.70/48 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Nd4 10.h5 Kf8 11.Ne4 Kg8 12.Kg6 Kh8 13.b5 axb5 14.Ng5 Nf5 15.cxb5 g3 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Ne7+ 18.Kf7 Nc6 19.Kxe6 g2 20.Nh3 Kg7 21.Kd6 Na7 22.Kd5 Kh6 23.Ke5 Kg7
1:37.48: +2.73/49 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Nd4 10.h5 Kf8 11.Ne4 Kg8 12.Kg6 Kh8 13.b5 axb5 14.Ng5 Nf5 15.cxb5 g3 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Ne7+ 18.Kf7 Nc6 19.Kxe6 g2 20.Nh3 Kg7 21.Kd6 Na7 22.Kd5 Kh6 23.Kc5 Nc8 24.Kc6 Kg7 25.Kc7
1:46.02: +2.70/50 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Nd4 10.h5 Kf8 11.Ne4 Kg8 12.Kg6 Kh8 13.b5 axb5 14.Ng5 Nf5 15.cxb5 g3 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Ne7+ 18.Kf7 Nc6 19.Kxe6 g2 20.Nh3 Kg7 21.Kd6 Na7 22.Kd5 Kh6 23.Kc5 Nc8 24.Kc6 Na7+ 25.Kb6 Nc8+ 26.Kc7 Na7 27.Kb7 Nb5 28.Kb6 Nd6 29.Kc6 Nc8 30.Kc5 Kg7
2:36.45: +2.82/51 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 g4 5.h4 Kd7 6.Kf6 Ke8 7.b4 Nxb4 8.Kg7 f4 9.Ne4 Nc2 10.gxf4 Nd4 11.h5 Nf5+ 12.Kg6 Ne7+ 13.Kg5
3:20.14: +2.82/52 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 g4 5.h4 Kd7 6.Kf6 Ke8 7.h5 Kf8 8.Nf1 Nd4 9.b4 Nc6 10.Ne3 Nxb4 11.Kxe6 Nc6 12.Nxf5 Nxa5 13.Kd5 Nc6 14.h6 Kg8 15.Nd6 a5 16.Nxb7 Ne7+ 17.Ke6 Nc6
8:33.04: +2.62/53 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.Nf1 Kf8 8.h5 Nd4 9.b4 Nc6 10.Kxe6 Nxb4 11.Ne3 Nc6 12.Nxf5 Nxa5 13.Kd5 b6 14.Ne3 Kg7 15.Nxg4 Nb3 16.Ne3 a5 17.Kc6 a4 18.Nc2 Nd2 19.Na3 Ne4 20.g4 Nf6 21.Kxb6 Nxg4
9:41.37: +3.23/54 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.Nf1 Kf8 8.h5 Nd4 9.b4 Kg8 10.Ke5 Nc6+ 11.Kxe6 Nxb4 12.Ne3 Nc6 13.Nxf5 Nxa5 14.Kd5 Nb3 15.Nd6 a5 16.Nxb7 a4 17.c5 a3 18.c6 a2 19.c7 a1=Q 20.c8=Q+ Kg7 21.Qxg4+ Kh8 22.Nd6 Qa5+ 23.Kc6 Qc3+ 24.Kb7 Na5+ 25.Ka6 Qc6+ 26.Kxa5 Qxd6 27.Qc8+ Kg7 28.g4 Qd2+ 29.Kb5 Qb2+ 30.Kc6 Qc1+ 31.Kb7 Qb2+
16:08.20: +3.92/55 1.Nd2 g5

[kgburcham]

[d] 8/1pk3p1/p3p2p/P1K2p2/2P1NP2/1P2n1PP/8/8 w - -
Ok, I stop the search at depth 55 (unfinished iteration) and more than 515 billions nodes computed:

Code: Select all

16:08.20 1.Nd2 (profondeur 55, 1/11), 515,3G positions (8,8M pos/sec)
0.00: +0.66/3 1.Nd6 g5 2.h4 gxh4 3.gxh4
0.00: +0.78/4 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Kc7
0.00: +0.64/5 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Kc7 4.Kd4 gxf4 5.gxf4
0.00: +0.60/6 1.Nd2 g5 2.Nf3 gxf4 3.gxf4 h5
0.00: 0.00/7 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Nf3 f4 4.h4 fxg3 5.hxg5
0.00: +0.42/8 1.Kd4 Nxc4 2.bxc4 fxe4 3.Kxe4 Kd6 4.Kd4 g6 5.c5+ Kc6
0.00: +0.70/9 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Nf3 g4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Nd4
0.00: +0.62/10 1.Nd6 Nf1 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nxg7 Nxg3 4.Kb6 Ne2 5.Kxb7 Nxf4 6.Kxa6 Nxh3
0.00: +0.38/11 1.Kd4 Nxc4 2.bxc4 fxe4 3.Kxe4 Kd6 4.Kd4 Kd7 5.h4 g6 6.g4
0.00: +0.36/12 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.Ne3 Ne4 6.Ke5 g6 7.g4
0.00: +0.48/13 1.Kd4 Nxc4 2.Kxc4 fxe4 3.Kd4 e3 4.Kxe3 Kd6 5.Ke4 g6 6.b4 Kc6 7.Ke5 Kb5 8.Kxe6 Kxb4 9.Kf6
0.00: +0.54/14 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Nf7 Kd7 6.Kd4 e5+ 7.Kd5 e4 8.Kxe4 Nf2+ 9.Kd4
0.00: +0.58/15 1.Nd6 g6 2.Ne8+ Kd8 3.Nf6 Nf1 4.Kb6 Kc8 5.Ne8 Kd7 6.Nc7 Nd2 7.b4 Kc8 8.Nxe6 Nxc4+ 9.Kc5 Nd2 10.g4 h5 11.gxh5 Ne4+ 12.Kd5 gxh5
0.00: +0.58/16 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.b4 Nxh3 4.Nb3 Nf2 5.Nc5 g6 6.Ke5 Kc6 7.Kxe6 Ne4 8.Nd3 Nxg3 9.Ne5+ Kc7 10.Nxg6 Ne4 11.Kxf5 Nd6+ 12.Ke5 Nxc4+ 13.Ke4
0.00: +0.98/17 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.Kd3 Nc6 9.Nxe6+ Kd6 10.Nd4 Nxa5 11.b4
0.00: +0.64/18 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.b4 Nc6+ 9.Kc5 e5 10.Ne4 Kd7 11.Kb6 Nxb4 12.Kxb7 Ke7 13.c5
0.00: +0.64/19 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.b4 Nc6+ 9.Kc5 e5 10.Ne4 Kd7 11.Kb6 Nxb4 12.Kxb7 Ke7 13.c5
0.00: +0.80/20 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd7+ 7.Kd4 Nb8 8.b4 Nc6+ 9.Kc5 e5 10.Ne4 Kd7 11.Kb6 Nxb4 12.Kxb7 Ke7 13.c5 Kd7 14.Kb6
0.00: +0.60/21 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Ke3 Na2 10.b5 axb5 11.cxb5 Nc3 12.b6+ Kc6 13.Kd3 Nb5 14.Ke4 Nd6+ 15.Kxe5 Nc4+ 16.Kd4 Nxb6
0.01: +0.56/22 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Kd5 Na2 10.Kc5 Nc1 11.Ne6+ Kc8 12.b5 Nb3+ 13.Kb4 Nd4 14.Nc5 Kc7 15.bxa6
0.01: +0.66/23 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Kd5 Na2 10.Kc5 Nc1 11.Ne6+ Kc8 12.b5 Nb3+ 13.Kd5 Nxa5 14.bxa6 bxa6 15.c5 Kd7 16.Kxe5 Nc4+ 17.Kd5 Ne3+ 18.Ke5
0.01: +0.78/24 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 e5+ 9.Kd5 Na2 10.Kc5 Nc1 11.Ne6+ Kc8 12.b5 Kd7 13.bxa6 bxa6 14.Ng5 Kc7 15.Kd5 Nb3 16.Nf3 Nxa5 17.c5
0.02: +0.78/25 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Ne5 Ne2+ 11.Ke3 Ng3 12.Nd3 Kc6 13.Kf3 Nf5 14.Kf4 Nd6 15.Ne5+ Kc7 16.c5 Nf5 17.Nd3 Kd7 18.Ke4 Ke7 19.Ne5 Ng3+ 20.Kd4 Ne2+ 21.Kc4 Nf4 22.c6 bxc6 23.Nxc6+ Kd6 24.Nb8
0.02: +0.70/26 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Ne5 Ne2+ 11.Ke3 Ng3 12.Nd3 Kc6 13.Kf3 Nf5 14.Kf4 Nd6 15.Ne5+ Kc7 16.c5 Nf5 17.Ke4 Ng3+ 18.Kd3 Nf5 19.Kc4 Ne3+ 20.Kd3 Nd5
0.03: +0.70/27 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Ne5 Ne2+ 11.Ke3 Ng3 12.Nd3 Kc6 13.Kf3 Nf5 14.Kf4 Nd6 15.Ne5+ Kc7 16.c5 Nf5 17.Ke4 Ng3+ 18.Kd3 Nf5 19.Kc4 Ne3+ 20.Kd4 Nd5 21.Kc4 Nf4
0.04: +0.75/28 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Kc3 Ne2+ 11.Kd3 Nc1+ 12.Kd2 Nb3+ 13.Kc3 Nc1 14.Kd4 Na2 15.b5 Nc1 16.bxa6 bxa6 17.Ng5 Nb3+ 18.Ke5 Nxa5 19.Nxe6+ Kc6 20.Kd4 Nb3+ 21.Kc3 Nc1
0.05: +0.74/29 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Kc3 Ne2+ 11.Kd3 Nc1+ 12.Kd4 Ne2+ 13.Ke4 Kd7 14.Ng5 Kd6 15.Ke3 Ng3 16.Ne4+ Nxe4 17.Kxe4 Kd7 18.Ke5 Ke7 19.Kd4 Kd6 20.Ke4
0.08: +0.66/30 1.Nd6 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.g4 fxg4 4.hxg4 Nxg4 5.Ne4 Ne5 6.Nxg5 Nd3+ 7.Kd4 Nc1 8.b4 Kc6 9.Nf7 Kc7 10.Kc3 Kd7 11.Kd2 Nb3+ 12.Kd3 Ke7 13.Ne5 Kd6 14.Ke4 Nd2+ 15.Kf4 Nb3 16.Nf3 Nc1 17.Ke3 Na2 18.b5 Kc5
0.16: +0.86/31 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Ke7 4.Nh5 Kf7 5.Kb6 Kg6 6.Kxb7 Kxh5 7.Kxa6 gxf4 8.gxf4 e5 9.Kb5 exf4 10.a6 f3 11.a7 f2 12.a8=Q f1=Q 13.Qe8+ Kg5 14.Qxe3+ f4 15.Qe7+ Kf5 16.Qh7+ Kg5 17.Qg8+ Kf6 18.Qf8+ Kg6 19.Qd6+ Kf5 20.Qd5+ Kf6 21.Qd2 f3 22.b4 Qxh3 23.Qd4+ Ke6 24.Qe3+ Kf5 25.c5 Qf1+ 26.Kb6 f2
0.19: +0.78/32 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Ke7 4.Nh5 Kf7 5.Kb6 Kg6 6.Kxb7 Kxh5 7.Kxa6 gxf4 8.gxf4 e5 9.Kb5 exf4 10.a6 f3 11.a7 f2 12.a8=Q f1=Q 13.Qe8+ Kg5 14.Qxe3+ f4 15.Qe7+ Kf5 16.Qh7+ Kg5 17.Qg8+ Kf5 18.Qd5+ Kf6 19.Qd4+ Kf5 20.Qd7+ Ke4 21.Qd5+ Ke3 22.Qe6+ Kd4 23.Qf6+ Ke4 24.Qh4 Kf5 25.Qxh6 f3 26.Qf8+ Ke4 27.b4 f2 28.Qe7+ Kf3 29.Qf7+ Kg3
0.29: +0.94/33 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Ke7 4.Nh5 Kd7 5.b4 gxf4 6.gxf4 Ng2 7.Kb6 Kc8 8.b5 Ne3 9.bxa6 bxa6 10.c5 Kd7 11.Nf6+ Ke7 12.Ng8+ Kd7 13.Nxh6 Nc4+ 14.Kxa6 Kc6 15.Nf7 Kxc5 16.Nd8 Kb4
0.44: +0.80/33 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Na2 12.b5 Nb4 13.Kd4 Kd6 14.c5+ Kc7 15.gxh6 gxh6 16.b6+ Kc8 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.c6 Nxf4 19.cxb7+ Kb8 20.Nd7+ Kxb7 21.Nc5+ Kc6 22.Nxa6
0.50: +0.88/34 1.Nd6 g5 2.Ne8+ Kd7 3.Nf6+ Kc7 4.Kd4 Nf1 5.Ke5 gxf4 6.gxf4 Nd2 7.b4 Nxc4+ 8.Kxe6 Ne3 9.Ng8 h5 10.Ne7 Nc2 11.Nxf5 Nxb4 12.Ng7 Nc6 13.f5 Nxa5 14.f6 Nc6 15.Ne8+ Kc8 16.Nd6+ Kc7 17.f7 Nd8+ 18.Kd5 Nxf7 19.Nxf7
0.52: +0.80/34 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Na2 12.b5 Nb4 13.Kd4 Kd6 14.c5+ Kc7 15.gxh6 gxh6 16.b6+ Kc8 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.c6 Nxf4 19.cxb7+ Kb8 20.Nd7+ Kxb7
1.00: +0.88/35 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Na2 12.b5 Nb4 13.Kd4 Kd6 14.c5+ Kc7 15.gxh6 gxh6 16.b6+ Kc8 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.c6 Nxf4 19.cxb7+ Kxb7 20.Nd7 Kc6 21.Nc5 Ne2+ 22.Kc4
1.11: +0.80/36 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kd3 Nb3 10.Nf3 Nc1+ 11.Ke3 Kd6 12.Ne5 h5 13.Kd2 Nb3+ 14.Kd3 Nc1+ 15.Ke3 Nb3 16.Nf7+ Ke7 17.g6 Nc1 18.Ng5 Nb3 19.c5 Nc1 20.Nf7 Na2
1.42: +1.11/37 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Ng3 13.Ne5+ Kd6 14.Ng6 Ne4 15.Kd4 Kd7 16.Ne5+ Ke7 17.c5 Ng3 18.c6 bxc6 19.Nxc6+ Kd6 20.Nb8 Ne2+ 21.Ke3 Nc3 22.Nxa6 Nd5+ 23.Kf3 e5 24.fxe5+ Kxe5 25.b5
2.05: +1.16/38 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Nh4 Ng3 14.Ng6 Ne4 15.Kd4 Kd7 16.c5 Nf2 17.Ne5+ Kc7 18.Ng6 Kd7
2.28: +1.08/39 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Nf2+ 14.Ke3 Ng4+ 15.Nxg4 fxg4 16.Kf2 e5 17.Kg3 exf4+ 18.Kxf4 g6 19.Kxg4 Ke5 20.b5 Kd4 21.bxa6 bxa6 22.Kf4
3.01: +1.08/40 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Nf2+ 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc6 18.Ke3
3.30: +1.08/41 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Nf2+ 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc6 18.Ke3
4.15: +1.08/42 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Ng3 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc7 18.Kd4 Kd6 19.Ne5
5.03: +1.08/43 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Ng3 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc7 18.Kd4 Kd6 19.Ne5
6.20: +1.08/44 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Kd7 12.Nf3 Kd6 13.Ne5 Ng3 14.Ke3 Ne4 15.Kd4 Nd2 16.Kd3 Ne4 17.Nf3 Kc7
13.29: +1.41/45 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 e5 12.Ke3 Nd6 13.fxe5 Nxc4+ 14.Kf4 g6 15.Nf3 Nb2 16.Ke3 Nd1+ 17.Kd4 Nf2 18.Kd5 Kd7 19.Nh4 Nh3 20.Nxg6 Nxg5 21.Nf4 Ke7 22.e6 Nf3 23.Ng6+ Kf6 24.e7 Kf7 25.Kd6 Ke8 26.Kc7 f4 27.Kb6
23.36: +1.39/46 1.Nd2 Nd1 2.Kd4 Nf2 3.h4 Nh1 4.Nf1 Nf2 5.b4 Ne4 6.g4 Nd6 7.g5 Ne4 8.Nh2 Nd2 9.Kc3 Ne4+ 10.Kd3 hxg5 11.hxg5 Nd6 12.Nf3 Nc8 13.Nd4 Kd6 14.b5 axb5 15.cxb5 Kd5 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Na7 18.Ke3 Kd6 19.Ke2 Kd5 20.Kd3 Nc8 21.Nb5 e5 22.Ke3 Kc6 23.a7 Nb6 24.Nc3 exf4+ 25.Kxf4 g6 26.Ke5 Kb7 27.Kf6 f4 28.Kxg6
1:08.29: +2.50/47 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Ne3 10.h5 Kf8 11.Kxe6 Nxc4 12.Nf5 b5 13.Kf6 g3 14.Nxg3 Ne3 15.h6 Kg8 16.Kg6 Nd5
1:23.32: +2.70/48 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Nd4 10.h5 Kf8 11.Ne4 Kg8 12.Kg6 Kh8 13.b5 axb5 14.Ng5 Nf5 15.cxb5 g3 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Ne7+ 18.Kf7 Nc6 19.Kxe6 g2 20.Nh3 Kg7 21.Kd6 Na7 22.Kd5 Kh6 23.Ke5 Kg7
1:37.48: +2.73/49 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Nd4 10.h5 Kf8 11.Ne4 Kg8 12.Kg6 Kh8 13.b5 axb5 14.Ng5 Nf5 15.cxb5 g3 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Ne7+ 18.Kf7 Nc6 19.Kxe6 g2 20.Nh3 Kg7 21.Kd6 Na7 22.Kd5 Kh6 23.Kc5 Nc8 24.Kc6 Kg7 25.Kc7
1:46.02: +2.70/50 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.b4 f4 8.Ne4 fxg3 9.Nxg3 Nd4 10.h5 Kf8 11.Ne4 Kg8 12.Kg6 Kh8 13.b5 axb5 14.Ng5 Nf5 15.cxb5 g3 16.a6 bxa6 17.bxa6 Ne7+ 18.Kf7 Nc6 19.Kxe6 g2 20.Nh3 Kg7 21.Kd6 Na7 22.Kd5 Kh6 23.Kc5 Nc8 24.Kc6 Na7+ 25.Kb6 Nc8+ 26.Kc7 Na7 27.Kb7 Nb5 28.Kb6 Nd6 29.Kc6 Nc8 30.Kc5 Kg7
2:36.45: +2.82/51 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 g4 5.h4 Kd7 6.Kf6 Ke8 7.b4 Nxb4 8.Kg7 f4 9.Ne4 Nc2 10.gxf4 Nd4 11.h5 Nf5+ 12.Kg6 Ne7+ 13.Kg5
3:20.14: +2.82/52 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 g4 5.h4 Kd7 6.Kf6 Ke8 7.h5 Kf8 8.Nf1 Nd4 9.b4 Nc6 10.Ne3 Nxb4 11.Kxe6 Nc6 12.Nxf5 Nxa5 13.Kd5 Nc6 14.h6 Kg8 15.Nd6 a5 16.Nxb7 Ne7+ 17.Ke6 Nc6
8:33.04: +2.62/53 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.Nf1 Kf8 8.h5 Nd4 9.b4 Nc6 10.Kxe6 Nxb4 11.Ne3 Nc6 12.Nxf5 Nxa5 13.Kd5 b6 14.Ne3 Kg7 15.Nxg4 Nb3 16.Ne3 a5 17.Kc6 a4 18.Nc2 Nd2 19.Na3 Ne4 20.g4 Nf6 21.Kxb6 Nxg4
9:41.37: +3.23/54 1.Nd2 g5 2.fxg5 hxg5 3.Kd4 Nc2+ 4.Ke5 Kd7 5.Kf6 g4 6.h4 Ke8 7.Nf1 Kf8 8.h5 Nd4 9.b4 Kg8 10.Ke5 Nc6+ 11.Kxe6 Nxb4 12.Ne3 Nc6 13.Nxf5 Nxa5 14.Kd5 Nb3 15.Nd6 a5 16.Nxb7 a4 17.c5 a3 18.c6 a2 19.c7 a1=Q 20.c8=Q+ Kg7 21.Qxg4+ Kh8 22.Nd6 Qa5+ 23.Kc6 Qc3+ 24.Kb7 Na5+ 25.Ka6 Qc6+ 26.Kxa5 Qxd6 27.Qc8+ Kg7 28.g4 Qd2+ 29.Kb5 Qb2+ 30.Kc6 Qc1+ 31.Kb7 Qb2+
16:08.20: +3.92/55 1.Nd2 g5

so 3.92 and score still climbing

[George]

Is this the first time that number one has lost to a female?

[IGarcia]

I don't consider it an insult to analyze the 2800 games, if there are blunders, then it is good to know why, what was better move etc..

...

and even 2000 players can understand easily why the move is bad

this is not what I read. several moves the GM were saying, What was that?, What does that mean? What is the purpose of that? and others would ask the GMs, what happened and they would answer, I don't know.

...

Note that I used 1 cpu so the results are going to be reproducable.

Note it is spelled reproducible
Note I do not need reproducible to determine bm for 2800 games.
Note that I prefer 12 cores with HT off, 8192 hash, and I use min 4 programs.
Also I do not stick with default settings

best to you
kgburcham

Its incredible your pedantic level.

I followed almost all games in livestream and when GM where asking "What does that move does? What is the purpose?" they where thinking loud. Most of those cases are the initial comment after Anand/Carlsen move. And then they start thinking and answering those normal questions we all have to do when we play chess without computer help.

You are writing as those questions where their final conclusions, As they were clueless after long thinking. And was not. Yes there where times they "blunder" but they had not much time to think and had to concentrate with comments and other TV show related things.

And in game 9, when carlsen played c2, FM comentators explored a line where Nf1 would be game over. And later happened!

You, with all that hardware + 4 programs and yada yada yada yada failed to determine a blunder in game 5, pointing a "two point blunder" with 46...Rg1 and the true was a forcing line where later Anand had 51...Re2 with a TB draw.

So, you with all your hardware also blundered. And you had several days, several programs, several CPU, maybe tablebases?, custom settings and you cant figure out it was not a blunder 46..Rg1

Actually that game (5) showed how much we have to respect those GM and how much caution we have to had when we use a computer to draw conclusions.

They do play as 3000, but cant keep the pace. Here was Anand "blunder?" with Rc1+ instead of Ra1. I ask myself how many humans, without computers, realized the game was lost after Rc1+?

45...Rc1 draws
[d] 8/7B/8/2pkP2R/p6p/Pb6/1K4PP/2r5 b - -


Komodo 6

33.01 +0.03 46...Re1 47.Bg8+ Ke4 (6.107.755.138) 13479

Stockfish 111113

40/57 2:23 0.00 46...Re1 47.Bg8+ Kd4 (2.047.663.200) 14232

first blunder of the match, two point blunder,
Game 5, Anand plays 46...Rg1
position after the blunder

[d] 8/7B/8/2pkP2R/p6p/Pb6/1K4PP/6r1 w - -

Stockfish 111113

38/63 2:03 +2.03++ 47.Bg8+ Kd4 (1.948.789.793) 15778

After those king of mistakes you better have some moderation on your claims.