Hmmm, I swear I made a formal move. Oh well.
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Bg2
[d]r1bqk2r/pppp1ppp/2n2n2/4p3/1bP5/2N2NP1/PP1PPPBP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0 5
Matthew:out
[CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:14 am
- Full name: Hannah Ravensloft
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
[d]r1bq1rk1/pppp1ppp/2n2n2/4p3/1bP5/2N2NP1/PP1PPPBP/R1BQK2R w KQ - 0 6
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Bg2 0-0
I think queenside castling would be wishful thinking in this game for you.

1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Bg2 0-0
I think queenside castling would be wishful thinking in this game for you.

-
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:14 am
- Full name: Hannah Ravensloft
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
Time, I think, to launch the Fly.
(You are using Stockfish, aren't you?)
Matthew:out
(You are using Stockfish, aren't you?)
Matthew:out
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
-
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:14 am
- Full name: Hannah Ravensloft
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Bg2 0-0 6.a3
[d]r1bq1rk1/pppp1ppp/2n2n2/4p3/1bP5/P1N2NP1/1P1PPPBP/R1BQK2R b KQ - 0 7
Matthew:out
[d]r1bq1rk1/pppp1ppp/2n2n2/4p3/1bP5/P1N2NP1/1P1PPPBP/R1BQK2R b KQ - 0 7
Matthew:out
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
-
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:14 am
- Full name: Hannah Ravensloft
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
You're taking your time!
FruitFly must now be at least at depth 30 on a 900Mhz ARMv6, as it has been pondering ever since I made my move.
So its hash tables will be quite full by the time you make your move.
Matthew:out
FruitFly must now be at least at depth 30 on a 900Mhz ARMv6, as it has been pondering ever since I made my move.
So its hash tables will be quite full by the time you make your move.
Matthew:out
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
[d]r1bq1rk1/pppp1pp1/2n2n1p/4p3/2P5/P1P2NP1/1P2PPBP/R1BQK2R w KQ - 0 8
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Bg2 0-0 6.a3
..6.Bxc3 if dxc3 then ..7.h6
The above would be the current position if you accept Mr. Fruitfly.

1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Bg2 0-0 6.a3
..6.Bxc3 if dxc3 then ..7.h6
The above would be the current position if you accept Mr. Fruitfly.

-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
ZirconiumX wrote:You're taking your time!
FruitFly must now be at least at depth 30 on a 900Mhz ARMv6, as it has been pondering ever since I made my move.
So its hash tables will be quite full by the time you make your move.
Matthew:out
Just got home form a hot date.

-
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:14 am
- Full name: Hannah Ravensloft
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
I do wish my Pi was reliable. I tried to OC to 930MHz but it kept crashing on me.
So my three hours of analysis was practically useless. Practically.
Matthew:out
So my three hours of analysis was practically useless. Practically.
Matthew:out
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
Take your time my friend. This is a tough position for both sides. I say that form experience.ZirconiumX wrote:I do wish my Pi was reliable. I tried to OC to 930MHz but it kept crashing on me.
So my three hours of analysis was practically useless. Practically.
Matthew:out
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am
- Location: Kansas USA
Re: [CC] Matt vs. Jimmy
I use several engines, but stockfish is a decent one.Time, I think, to launch the Fly.
(You are using Stockfish, aren't you?)