Moderator: Ras
).
Hi Luca,metax wrote:I just released ChessMind 0.82.
Changes to ChessMind 0.80:
- better at tactics, this at the cost of lower search depth
- improvements in evaluation, does not sacrifice pawns without any reason as often as 0.80
- some more UCI options (explained in the readme file)
- improvements in time management
- smaller aspiration windows (also adjustable)
The strength should be around 2100 CCRL now (at least I hope so
Download
It's good to have a high level of self-confidence GrahamGraham Banks wrote:Hi Luca,metax wrote:I just released ChessMind 0.82.
Changes to ChessMind 0.80:
- better at tactics, this at the cost of lower search depth
- improvements in evaluation, does not sacrifice pawns without any reason as often as 0.80
- some more UCI options (explained in the readme file)
- improvements in time management
- smaller aspiration windows (also adjustable)
The strength should be around 2100 CCRL now (at least I hope so
Download
it appears here that something is not right with this version. It comes straight out of book thinking it's over 2 pawns ahead in every game!
As a result, it's performing poorly as one would expect in this tournament I'm running:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=5255
Cheers,
Graham.
Indeed, but to be over confident?Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:It's good to have a high level of self-confidence GrahamGraham Banks wrote:Hi Luca,metax wrote:I just released ChessMind 0.82.
Changes to ChessMind 0.80:
- better at tactics, this at the cost of lower search depth
- improvements in evaluation, does not sacrifice pawns without any reason as often as 0.80
- some more UCI options (explained in the readme file)
- improvements in time management
- smaller aspiration windows (also adjustable)
The strength should be around 2100 CCRL now (at least I hope so
Download
it appears here that something is not right with this version. It comes straight out of book thinking it's over 2 pawns ahead in every game!
As a result, it's performing poorly as one would expect in this tournament I'm running:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=5255
Cheers,
Graham.
Can somebody else who uses ChessMind confirm this behaviour?Graham Banks wrote: it appears here that something is not right with this version. It comes straight out of book thinking it's over 2 pawns ahead in every game!
As a result, it's performing poorly as one would expect in this tournament I'm running:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=5255
Cheers,
Graham.
Hi Graham,Graham Banks wrote:Can somebody else who uses ChessMind confirm this behaviour?Graham Banks wrote: it appears here that something is not right with this version. It comes straight out of book thinking it's over 2 pawns ahead in every game!
As a result, it's performing poorly as one would expect in this tournament I'm running:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=5255
Cheers,
Graham.
The previous version was okay.
Thanks Ben-Hur.bhlangonijr wrote:Hi Graham,Graham Banks wrote:Can somebody else who uses ChessMind confirm this behaviour?Graham Banks wrote: it appears here that something is not right with this version. It comes straight out of book thinking it's over 2 pawns ahead in every game!
As a result, it's performing poorly as one would expect in this tournament I'm running:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=5255
Cheers,
Graham.
The previous version was okay.
Yes I can confirm that. I am using ChessMind to test Redqueen and it appears that it is losing every game because of that. It seems like a problem in the evaluation function regarding dynamic terms, perhaps mobility or King safety. The engine sometimes evaluates equal positions to 1 or 2 pawns ahead, then when it starts losing material the score drops to something more realistic.
Regards,
