Spark 0.3 is now available:
http://members.ziggo.nl/allard.siemelink/spark/
- single cpu only
- without opening book
- without endgame bitbases/tablebase support
- performs best on a 64-bit OS (Linux, Mac OSX, or Windows)
- probably a bit stronger than my other engine: Bright
Spark released
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
-
- Posts: 43840
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
-
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Spark released
Thank God for that.Graham Banks wrote:Thanks Allard.

Christopher
-
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Spark released
Is it better than Bright this time?Christopher Conkie wrote:Thank God for that.Graham Banks wrote:Thanks Allard.
Christopher
An honest question.

Christopher
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Spark released
Thanks Allard for this great piece of software....I was awaiting this release and was ashamed to ask you via e-mail when will you release it....
Best regards,
Dr.D
Best regards,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:53 pm
Re: Spark released
Thanks a bunch! testing beginsAllard Siemelink wrote:Spark 0.3 is now available:
http://members.ziggo.nl/allard.siemelink/spark/
- single cpu only
- without opening book
- without endgame bitbases/tablebase support
- performs best on a 64-bit OS (Linux, Mac OSX, or Windows)
- probably a bit stronger than my other engine: Bright

Regards Mark
Quad Q6600 3.0 Ghz, Vista 64bit, 4gb Ram
Quad Q6600 3.0 Ghz, Vista 64bit, 4gb Ram
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Spark released
As I said: probably.Is it better than Bright this time?
Head to head on my 32-bit Windows machine and with ultrafast time controls, Spark beats Bright by 50 elo or so. Mostly because it searches smarter and deeper, I gather.
The difference should be more pronounced on a 64-bit OS as Spark then picks up a 50% speed premium due to it being a bitboard engine.
I hope CCRL and CEGT will test it, then we'll know for sure.
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Spark released
Great news....thanks....Allard Siemelink wrote:As I said: probably.Is it better than Bright this time?
Head to head on my 32-bit Windows machine and with ultrafast time controls, Spark beats Bright by 50 elo or so. Mostly because it searches smarter and deeper, I gather.
The difference should be more pronounced on a 64-bit OS as Spark then picks up a 50% speed premium due to it being a bitboard engine.
I hope CCRL and CEGT will test it, then we'll know for sure.
Waiting for the MP version regards,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Spark released
Yes, and Olivier. Very nice to have this distraction in all the mess around us.Allard Siemelink wrote:As I said: probably.Is it better than Bright this time?
Head to head on my 32-bit Windows machine and with ultrafast time controls, Spark beats Bright by 50 elo or so. Mostly because it searches smarter and deeper, I gather.
The difference should be more pronounced on a 64-bit OS as Spark then picks up a 50% speed premium due to it being a bitboard engine.
I hope CCRL and CEGT will test it, then we'll know for sure.
Thank you Allard
Christopher