the championships are not the same thing as hobbyist tournaments AlainAlainza wrote:Hi Steve,
I fully agree on the PC Card side and refused last year the participation of a computer+program even if it was an old pair (Apple II + Sargon III I think).Steve B wrote: a MODIFIED computer took the A group and a PC card (not even a dedicated chess computer!)took the B group
For the "Modified" computer aspect, I am not against, even if I would not myself come with such computer (and in fact, I don't have any tuned computer) : as far as I know, many (if not all) official championships were done with prototypes or overclocked machines.
May be we should provide two tournament results (based on the same games) ? One for "all participants" and the other for "commercially available computers" ?
trying to add material to the tournament's page regards,
Alain
the championships were really testing grounds for the manufactures to bring out their most powerful new programs and hardware
the winner of these matches would then claim the much coveted and financially profitable title of World champion and then release the winning program AFTER the fact in a board with less powerful hardware then actually won the tournament
for fun matches between enthusiasts the only prize after the tournament is usually a slap on the back and an immediate sale of the winning computer on Ebay

however it is your tournament of course and i will enjoy watching the results no matter if you even allowed Hydra and its 2000 processors to compete
i simply ignore all games played by Modified or over clocked(tuned) computers and recalculate the REAL winner
Hardcore Collector Regards
Steve