Hi, folks!
Lately I have been working on improving the eval of my engine, which so far has come at the expense of the speed. I have two versions of my engine, let's call them Matt and Eve, which I linked below. One has an improved evaluation, the other is the stable version, but I won't tell you which is which for now. If, unlike me, you understand chess could you give me your opinion on the positional play of these two engines and which you prefer more?
Regards,
Matt http:///www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/matt-windows-amd64.exe
Eve http:///www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/eve-windows-amd64.exe
I can provide binaries for other platforms if needed.
need some help assessing the evaluation
Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Re: need some help assessing the evaluation
Hmmm Matt sounds like 'material and 'eve' like 'eval' :)brtzsnr wrote:Hi, folks!
Lately I have been working on improving the eval of my engine, which so far has come at the expense of the speed. I have two versions of my engine, let's call them Matt and Eve, which I linked below. One has an improved evaluation, the other is the stable version, but I won't tell you which is which for now. If, unlike me, you understand chess could you give me your opinion on the positional play of these two engines and which you prefer more?
Regards,
Matt http:///www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/matt-windows-amd64.exe
Eve http:///www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/eve-windows-amd64.exe
I can provide binaries for other platforms if needed.
I will try to collect test games and look at them, but not before
next weekend.
How much is the speed/depth diff in your measurements so far?
Guenther
Guenther Simon
http://rwbc-chess.de/
http://rwbc-chess.de/
Re: need some help assessing the evaluation
Not quite. zurichess is about 2800 or CCRL 40/40 so the eval is more complicated than "material" only.Guenther wrote: Hmmm Matt sounds like 'material and 'eve' like 'eval'
I will try to collect test games and look at them, but not before
next weekend.
I measured about 10-30 Elo difference depending on the platform (arm64 vs amd64). I'm deliberately omitting details not to bias you or anyone else in their assessment. I promise to give more details later.Guenther wrote: How much is the speed/depth diff in your measurements so far?
Guenther
zurichess - http://www.zurichess.xyz
Re: need some help assessing the evaluation
Would you happen to have Linux binaries for Mat and Eve? Id love to take a look at the two engines, but my laptop doesn't have windows.
-
AlvaroBegue
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:46 pm
- Location: New York
Re: need some help assessing the evaluation
I usually don't have much trouble running Windows engines under Linux using Wine. You may want to give that a try.jorose wrote:Would you happen to have Linux binaries for Mat and Eve? Id love to take a look at the two engines, but my laptop doesn't have windows.
EDIT: I just ran this, and it seems to work:
> xboard -fcp "wine matt-windows-amd64.exe" -fUCI
Re: need some help assessing the evaluation
Thank you, Alvaro!
Thank you, Jonathan!
If you prefer a linux binaries you can use these two links
Eve http://www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/eve-linux-amd64
Matt http://www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/matt-linux-amd64
Thank you, Jonathan!
If you prefer a linux binaries you can use these two links
Eve http://www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/eve-linux-amd64
Matt http://www.zurichess.xyz/binaries/matt-linux-amd64
zurichess - http://www.zurichess.xyz
