This version participated in the CSVN.
The binaries are compiled using Java 9 (not backwards compatible).
Score is about 2800 elo.
See:
https://github.com/sandermvdb/chess22k/releases/tag/1.6
chess22k 1.6 released
Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
-
sandermvdb
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 12:29 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: chess22k 1.6 released
What does this mean exacly? Will it not run with 8.xxx?sandermvdb wrote:This version participated in the CSVN.
The binaries are compiled using Java 9 (not backwards compatible).
Score is about 2800 elo.
See:
https://github.com/sandermvdb/chess22k/releases/tag/1.6
At the official oracle site the java runtime version for windows is still at 8.151
and that's the version that I have of course.
Guenther
Guenther Simon
http://rwbc-chess.de/
http://rwbc-chess.de/
- Graham Banks
- Posts: 30733
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: chess22k 1.6 released
Thanks Sander. Looking forward to testing this new version. 
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
-
sandermvdb
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 12:29 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: chess22k 1.6 released
Indeed, will not run with 8.xxx. Here you can download version 9:Guenther wrote:
What does this mean exacly? Will it not run with 8.xxx?
At the official oracle site the java runtime version for windows is still at 8.151
and that's the version that I have of course.
Guenther
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/ ... 48532.html
Re: chess22k 1.6 released
Thanks for the link. But there is already huge damage done here :(sandermvdb wrote:Indeed, will not run with 8.xxx. Here you can download version 9:Guenther wrote:
What does this mean exacly? Will it not run with 8.xxx?
At the official oracle site the java runtime version for windows is still at 8.151
and that's the version that I have of course.
Guenther
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/ ... 48532.html
(not because of your program of course.)
I just noticed that none of my dozens of WB + UCI native java programs installed work anymore probably since the last update 8.151 from 17-10-23. That's a pity.
Sure most here will have the same problem already, but yet unnoticed.
Well, normally they say one should not have several java installations in parallel, but what to do now?
And even if I would try to install an older branch of java again, I guess I have to put the full path in all older installations,
because the system environment variable will be set to the newest one I guess, when calling ''java -jar ....'
Guenther
Guenther Simon
http://rwbc-chess.de/
http://rwbc-chess.de/
Re: chess22k 1.6 released
User linuxchess compiled a version for Java 8 and announced it at Chess2U:
http://www.chess2u.com/t11492-chess22k
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fDkS-u ... oXPDLGXnyK
Any idea if this will have some influence on its performance?
(speed - different instructions...)
Probably we can compare nps (if there is only a speed diff) for both?
Can't test this before Thursday though.
Guenther
http://www.chess2u.com/t11492-chess22k
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fDkS-u ... oXPDLGXnyK
Any idea if this will have some influence on its performance?
(speed - different instructions...)
Probably we can compare nps (if there is only a speed diff) for both?
Can't test this before Thursday though.
Guenther
Guenther Simon
http://rwbc-chess.de/
http://rwbc-chess.de/
-
sandermvdb
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 12:29 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: chess22k 1.6 released
What do you mean exactly?Guenther wrote:User linuxchess compiled a version for Java 8 and announced it at Chess2U:
http://www.chess2u.com/t11492-chess22k
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fDkS-u ... oXPDLGXnyK
Any idea if this will have some influence on its performance?
(speed - different instructions...)
Java 9 is backwards compatible with Java 8 (and +/- same performance), if that is what you are asking.

