Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
-
De Noose Daniel
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:36 am
Post
by De Noose Daniel » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:53 am
Hi everybody,
I'm actually working on modifying Toga II to be a "sparring partner".
To do that I'm making some tests now but I think I'm near a correct elo decreasing formula without decrease the calculated nodes or slow down the engine.
As an example, The 2500 plays against 2200,2300,2400,2600,2700,2800 (+/- 300 elo).
Here are partial results calculated with bayeselo :
What do you think about this ?
-
De Noose Daniel
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:36 am
Post
by De Noose Daniel » Tue Feb 18, 2020 12:48 pm
After a little bit more games, it seems that the formula is ok...
But the test continues .
The idea of this formula is to do like a human. Usually good players don't see deeper moves than not so good players ... They just make less misevaluations and give less often a gift. A "not so good" player can sometimes play an entire game without a mistake.
It's the same here.
I had a bit randomness in making blunders or evaluating a position.
-
BrendanJNorman
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:43 pm
- Full name: Brendan J Norman
Post
by BrendanJNorman » Thu Feb 20, 2020 9:46 am
De Noose Daniel wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 12:48 pm
After a little bit more games, it seems that the formula is ok...
But the test continues .
The idea of this formula is to do like a human. Usually good players don't see deeper moves than not so good players ... They just make less misevaluations and give less often a gift. A "not so good" player can sometimes play an entire game without a mistake.
It's the same here.
I had a bit randomness in making blunders or evaluating a position.
Sounds good. I'm definitely into such things. Please let us know when a download is available to try out.
