DON 1.0b derivate Glaurung

[velmarin]

DON 1.0b

Autor: Ehsan Rashid

Code: Select all

Overview

DON is a free UCI chess engine derived from Glaurung 2.1. It is not a complete chess program and requires some UCI-compatible GUI (e.g. XBoard with PolyGlot, eboard, Arena, Sigma Chess, Shredder, Chess Partner or Fritz) in order to be used comfortably. Read the documentation for your GUI of choice for information about how to use DON with it.

This version of DON supports up to 64 CPUs. The engine defaults to one search thread, so it is therefore recommended to inspect the value of the Threads UCI parameter, and to make sure it equals the number of CPU cores on your computer.
ect,,

Compiling 64 bit pop and no pop and 32-bit with Visual C + +2012,
I no was unable to another compiler.
alleged compatibility with XP, I'm not sure , without additional files. Code included.

Enjoy. Jose.
Github:
[LINK deleted by mod Team]
Relase:
[LINK deleted by mod Team]

[jpqy]

Thanks Jose!

Hardends2013 on i7 2670QM 4cores -> 10sec./position!

1. Hernandez,R - Sula,Z, Saloniki ol 1984 Solved in 2.62s/35; Solved: 1
2. Maiwald,J - Bischoff,K, Gladenbach ch-Deutschland 1997 > 10s.
3. Platov,V, 1911 > 10s.
4. Topalov,V - Shirov,A, Linares 1998 > 10s.
5. Smyslov,V - Gurgenidze,B, Tbilisi ch-USSR 1966 > 10s.
6. Chekhover,V - Lasker,E, Moscow 1935 > 10s.
7. Spiridonov,N - Shamkovich,L, Polanica Zdroj 1970 Solved in 3.68s/28; Solved: 2
8. Polugaevsky,L - Ree,H, Amsterdam 1981 > 10s.
9. Seyboth,H, 1908 Solved in 5.37s/33; Solved: 3
10. Rovner,D - Schipunov, Kiev 1938 > 10s.
11. Karpov,A - Knaak,R, Baden-Baden 1992 > 10s.
12. Smyslov,V, 1999 Solved in 4.70s/34; Solved: 4
13. Riabinin,N, 1993 > 10s.
14. Simkhovich,F, 1926 > 10s.
15. Ree,H - Hort,V, Wijk aan Zee 1986 > 10s.
16. W.Eigenmann > 10s.
17. Uhlmann - Malich, Berlin 1968 > 10s.
18. Beliavsky,A - Dolmatov,S, Minsk ch-USSR 1979 Solved in 0.02s/9; Solved: 5
19. Pos. 9 - Kasparian 1969 Solved in 3.71s/37; Solved: 6
20. Stangl,M - Schneider,A, Berlin 1992 Solved in 3.23s/37; Solved: 7
21. Sax,G - Kovacevic,V, Sarajevo 1982 > 10s.
22. Schoneberg,M - Starck,B, Weimar 1968 > 10s.
23. Kotov,A - Botvinnik,M, Moscow ch-USSR 1955 > 10s.
24. Kaidanov,G - Antoshin,V, RSFSR ch 1984 > 10s.
25. Smyslov,V - Gurgenidze,B, Tbilisi ch-USSR 1966 > 10s.
26. Nebylitsyn - Galuzin, USSR 1969 > 10s.
27. Chigorin,M - Tarrasch,S, Budapest 1896 > 10s.
28. Matanovic,A - Larsen,B, Portoroz izt 1958 Solved in 0.03s/6; Solved: 8
29. Villeneuve,A, 1984 > 10s.
30. Khenkin,V, 1966 > 10s.
31. Tukmakov,V - Veingold,A, USSR 1979 Solved in 0.02s/6; Solved: 9
32. Gufeld,E - Kavalek,L, Marianske Lazne tt jr 1962 > 10s.
33. Cathignol,P, 1981 > 10s.
34. Yudasin,L - Kramnik,V, Wijk aan Zee cm 1994 Solved in 0.30s/16; Solved: 10
35. Behting,K, 1906 > 10s.
36. Gurvich,A, 1952 > 10s.
37. Simkhovich,F, 1927 > 10s.
38. Gurgenidze,D, 1979 > 10s.
39. fortitude > 10s.
40. Pos. 3 > 10s.

DON 1.0b pop64
Result: 10 out of 40 = 25.0%. Average time = 2.36s / 24.10

[mcostalba]

Actually looking at initial commit:

[LINK deleted by mod Team]

It seems more Stockfish than Glaurung (for instance book and move generation implementations are almost directly copied form SF).

I'd think it shows "derived from Glaurung" simply because author copied SF readme file verbatim changing only the name:

https://github.com/mcostalba/Stockfish

Anyhow I have to add that the author did a good amount of work above the original sources so that it is a derived and independent engine by all means.

And because it publishes the sources it is 100% legal.

[velmarin]

Actually looking at initial commit:

[LINK deleted by mod Team]

It seems more Stockfish than Glaurung (for instance book and move generation implementations are almost directly copied form SF).

I'd think it shows "derived from Glaurung" simply because author copied SF readme file verbatim changing only the name:

https://github.com/mcostalba/Stockfish

Anyhow I have to add that the author did a good amount of work above the original sources so that it is a derived and independent engine by all means.

And because it publishes the sources it is 100% legal.

Marco Strongly agree.

I also seemed. Code very stockfish
In addition to these things to you that you love, is compiled as C + +11(Visual C++ 2012),
But it certainly has a lot of work that the author does not explain.
The branch compiled, is saying DON-mingw

[michiguel]

Actually looking at initial commit:

[LINK deleted by mod Team]

It seems more Stockfish than Glaurung (for instance book and move generation implementations are almost directly copied form SF).

I'd think it shows "derived from Glaurung" simply because author copied SF readme file verbatim changing only the name:

https://github.com/mcostalba/Stockfish

Anyhow I have to add that the author did a good amount of work above the original sources so that it is a derived and independent engine by all means.

And because it publishes the sources it is 100% legal.

Legal, but not really an example to follow. Acknowledging where things were taken from is, at least, a minimum standard of courtesy (to the authors and the users who download it or may start a fork from it). I understand that for certain piece of software is awkward to list all contributions, but here... he could have just added the name SF to Glaurung.

Miguel

[syzygy]

Legal, but not really an example to follow. Acknowledging where things were taken from is, at least, a minimum standard of courtesy (to the authors and the users who download it or may start a fork from it). I understand that for certain piece of software is awkward to list all contributions, but here... he could have just added the name SF to Glaurung.

But did he actually release anything?

Just having a repository on github with some work in progress and a README that isn't yet very clear on the origin of the program seems fine to me. But if he's been publicly announcing his project somewhere then I agree he should have made it clear that it derives from SF.

So the question is how did Jose learn about this engine?

[mohzus]

Legal, but not really an example to follow. Acknowledging where things were taken from is, at least, a minimum standard of courtesy (to the authors and the users who download it or may start a fork from it). I understand that for certain piece of software is awkward to list all contributions, but here... he could have just added the name SF to Glaurung.

But did he actually release anything?

Just having a repository on github with some work in progress and a README that isn't yet very clear on the origin of the program seems fine to me. But if he's been publicly announcing his project somewhere then I agree he should have made it clear that it derives from SF.

So the question is how did Jose learn about this engine?

I've done an "extensive" google search and I'm 100% sure José's source is [LINK deleted by mod Team]. So now the question is whether "tyuyy" is Ehsan or not, I guess.

[velmarin]

So the question is how did Jose learn about this engine?

I work with who asked me to compile,
compile almost everything. It is a pleasure for me.
It's easy to find a program, you enter Github, and marks in the search "Chess" and you sort by last updated.

Now for my question is that you ask that question.
A respect for others members, please.


[LINK deleted by mod Team]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[Sylwy]

DON 1.0b

Autor: Ehsan Rashid

THANK YOU !



Don SilvianR

[Sylwy]

alleged compatibility with XP, I'm not sure , without additional files..........

Works fine in Win XP !

Thank you, again !

SilvianR