Richard Pijl wrote:For those that wonder what CTD is: It is not the Baron, but a still very dumb engine with only the basic stuff to play chess. It does have a relatively fast move generator etc. but no nullmove, no pruning, no search tricks and basically a piece-square table evaluation (with only a few extra's.
Funny enough, although the Baron has a more realistic score, and finds Nh5 faster, it seems to have a bit more trouble selecting Nf4 (in the PV):
Ryan Benitez wrote:Very good showing by both Diep and CTD.
I suppose CTD is Baron.
1/4 against the strong programs it has to play against.
Not so nice a showing IMHO.
Marc
I take this as a compliment as it was really CTD playing. Before the tournament I send CTD022 to a few testers and that was exactly the version that drew Spike in the first round. Between rounds I did some millipawn evaluation tuning and between rounds 6 and 7 I reactivated the passed pawn evaluation (pawn endings only) that I ported from the Baron a long time ago, and which I removed in CTD 015 or 016 to make it deliberately a more basic engine. I remembered this late yesterday night and put it back in. I don't think it mattered in either of the games though.
Needless to say that I was very happy with the tournament result.
mclane wrote:thank you theo, what an amazing tournament.
i am especially happy that The King and Diep were so good although their hardware was not the best.
My pleasure.
In addition to what you write my remark is that everybody can be beaten (Rybka by Junior and Junior by Zzzzzz!).
Thanks to the new wireless broadband internet support it was easy to improvise broadcasting as I did with Zzzzzz-Deep Junior.