
What would have been interesting for me is to match leela against MCTS version of scorpio with the minmax back up operator to evaluate how much the NN eval + averaging backup of lczero fair against a hand-crafted evaluation. I think they should be of equal strength, scorpio-mcts also trashes TSCP and could be 2400 elo i think. If we don't go further than that with lczero it means the lczero effort is one big evaluation tuning done from scratch.
When will the reality sink in for many who blindly belive you can overcome tactical weakness with just a neural network ? 5-million games played and still counting.
I am more and more inching towards labeling the AlphaZero result an elaborate hoax and believe me i am resisting every day. This is not coming from the test setup they used as some would claim but from this very glaring tactical weakness of MCTS that they claim is no problem. You would think Stockfish would get atleast one win from 100 games against alphazero. Why are they not playing AlphaZero on chess servers like they did for Go ? It sounds to me like a very very selective reporting of results. I am not one to bash other people's work but just following the facts until proven otherwise.
I think lczero should just continue using the same exact methods AlphaZero used so that we can ask google why we can't reproduce their results if that turned out to be the case.
Daniel