Actually I can't think of a better test than playing rated opponents with cash prizes for results. I'm sure he could find opponents who would play for smaller prizes, but that's up to him. Of course we need a lot more data than just a few games, but this is certainly helpful.Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
- Full name: Larry Kaufman
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Komodo rules!
-
- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
- Full name: Larry Kaufman
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Without commenting on other posts he has made, I do believe that all games he has posted for engines against FIDE rated, named human opponents are legitimate. None of them have ever said otherwise, one of them I know personally, and both the results and the games seem plausible. It's hard to believe that anyone from a prosperous nation would risk being proven a fraud by naming fake opponents just for a free upgrade of Dragon.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site.![]()
Komodo rules!
-
- Posts: 2583
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:43 am
- Full name: Brendan J Norman
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Fair enough. Except I think the last sentence shows a little naivety.lkaufman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:01 pmWithout commenting on other posts he has made, I do believe that all games he has posted for engines against FIDE rated, named human opponents are legitimate. None of them have ever said otherwise, one of them I know personally, and both the results and the games seem plausible. It's hard to believe that anyone from a prosperous nation would risk being proven a fraud by naming fake opponents just for a free upgrade of Dragon.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site.![]()

-
- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
- Full name: Larry Kaufman
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
I suppose "anyone" was a poor choice of word; there are of course some people who are dishonest and don't weigh risk vs. reward. But generally they aren't really avid fans of chess or computer chess. Playing chess teaches you to consider the consequences of your actions, though not everyone learns the lesson well.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 5:04 amFair enough. Except I think the last sentence shows a little naivety.lkaufman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:01 pmWithout commenting on other posts he has made, I do believe that all games he has posted for engines against FIDE rated, named human opponents are legitimate. None of them have ever said otherwise, one of them I know personally, and both the results and the games seem plausible. It's hard to believe that anyone from a prosperous nation would risk being proven a fraud by naming fake opponents just for a free upgrade of Dragon.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site.![]()
![]()
Komodo rules!
-
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
You do NOT trust me, but I trust you, and since on this youtube video it say that you are close to 22300 in Blitz. I will offer you the opportunity to make $55.00 if you win against Komodo dragon 2.6 at T/C 15 Minutes. You already have a youtube channel and other members here also have youtube channel, or if you are with chess.com a single match can be arranged, simply set the UCI_ELO to 2280 and if you win I will send you a Money Order for $55.00. I will make a copy of the money order and post it here, and mail it to whatever address you provide if you win.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site.![]()
-
- Posts: 4718
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
As (not) done here e.g. ?Chessqueen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 3:42 pmYou do NOT trust me, but I trust you, and since on this youtube video it say that you are close to 22300 in Blitz. I will offer you the opportunity to make $55.00 if you win against Komodo dragon 2.6 at T/C 15 Minutes. You already have a youtube channel and other members here also have youtube channel, or if you are with chess.com a single match can be arranged, simply set the UCI_ELO to 2280 and if you win I will send you a Money Order for $55.00. I will make a copy of the money order and post it here, and mail it to whatever address you provide if you win.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site. :roll:
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438788
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438643
(caveat: another pichy dramedy, if your nerves aren't that good don't look at it)
-
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
You probably ignored the fact that the bet became illegal, since he played at least 50 games and only selected the only game that he managed to beat Glaurung. The bet was to play only one game and beat it NOT to practice and play at least 50 games and select one of the winning one.Guenther wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 4:16 pmAs (not) done here e.g. ?Chessqueen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 3:42 pmYou do NOT trust me, but I trust you, and since on this youtube video it say that you are close to 22300 in Blitz. I will offer you the opportunity to make $55.00 if you win against Komodo dragon 2.6 at T/C 15 Minutes. You already have a youtube channel and other members here also have youtube channel, or if you are with chess.com a single match can be arranged, simply set the UCI_ELO to 2280 and if you win I will send you a Money Order for $55.00. I will make a copy of the money order and post it here, and mail it to whatever address you provide if you win.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site.![]()
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438788
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438643
(caveat: another pichy dramedy, if your nerves aren't that good don't look at it)
Note: I do NOT want to discuss an old subject or topic, but you keep bringing old topics and cutting the essential of the original bet, which was to play one single game and to beat it.
-
- Posts: 4718
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Ouch you are lying again and again...Chessqueen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 6:26 pmYou probably ignored the fact that the bet became illegal, since he played at least 50 games and only selected the only game that he managed to beat Glaurung. The bet was to play only one game and beat it NOT to practice and play at least 50 games and select one of the winning one.Guenther wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 4:16 pmAs (not) done here e.g. ?Chessqueen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 3:42 pmYou do NOT trust me, but I trust you, and since on this youtube video it say that you are close to 22300 in Blitz. I will offer you the opportunity to make $55.00 if you win against Komodo dragon 2.6 at T/C 15 Minutes. You already have a youtube channel and other members here also have youtube channel, or if you are with chess.com a single match can be arranged, simply set the UCI_ELO to 2280 and if you win I will send you a Money Order for $55.00. I will make a copy of the money order and post it here, and mail it to whatever address you provide if you win.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site. :roll:
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438788
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438643
(caveat: another pichy dramedy, if your nerves aren't that good don't look at it)
Note: I do NOT want to discuss an old subject or topic, but you keep bringing old topics and cutting the essential of the original bet, which was to play one single game and to beat it.
Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 17:46:56 07/26/05
Here is Glaurungj-FRC 0.2.5 compatible with Shredder GUI, Please play a complete
Chess960 game without using AntiChess. Please play a complete game without being
afraid to loose :-)
PS: I will send you $50.00 Dollard if you can beat Glaurung in a 30 minutes
game, but I will go over your game and there should NOT be any three consecutive
moves played by Shredder or Pharaon-FRC. All the moves must be made by you :-)
First of all, your bet said nothing about how much games should have been played.
Secondly even if irrelevant due to (1), he surely did not play 50 games, because the time difference between your bet offer and his posting of two games (1 draw, 1 win), was not enough for such an amount 30min games and it would have been crazy to sacrifice his sleep for this.
Eduard is still here and can be informed for kicking your ass about the past ;-)
-
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Please play a complete game without being afraid to loose. It did not say several games and choose the winning one.Guenther wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 7:21 pmOuch you are lying again and again...Chessqueen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 6:26 pmYou probably ignored the fact that the bet became illegal, since he played at least 50 games and only selected the only game that he managed to beat Glaurung. The bet was to play only one game and beat it NOT to practice and play at least 50 games and select one of the winning one.Guenther wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 4:16 pmAs (not) done here e.g. ?Chessqueen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 3:42 pmYou do NOT trust me, but I trust you, and since on this youtube video it say that you are close to 22300 in Blitz. I will offer you the opportunity to make $55.00 if you win against Komodo dragon 2.6 at T/C 15 Minutes. You already have a youtube channel and other members here also have youtube channel, or if you are with chess.com a single match can be arranged, simply set the UCI_ELO to 2280 and if you win I will send you a Money Order for $55.00. I will make a copy of the money order and post it here, and mail it to whatever address you provide if you win.BrendanJNorman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:41 pmDude has all the hallmarks of a scammer. Where's the proof these games are even played by the parties mentioned?Cornfed wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:08 pmI apologize up front as I know I am butting in but(t)...what on earth does a few offhand games tell one...and paying this guy seems ridiculous. I am sure there are much better/faster/cheaper ways to gauge reasonable approximations for the new settings.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:20 pm Very nice game by Novag Diablo, at the moment I am negotiating with Carlos Abreu Jean who is rated 2259 Rapid to play versus Komodo Dragon but he wants $65.00 for winning and $45.00 for drawing.
I mean, this guy couldn't even use his OWN name honestly on this site.![]()
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438788
https://www.stmintz.com/ccc/index.php?id=438643
(caveat: another pichy dramedy, if your nerves aren't that good don't look at it)
Note: I do NOT want to discuss an old subject or topic, but you keep bringing old topics and cutting the essential of the original bet, which was to play one single game and to beat it.
Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 17:46:56 07/26/05
Here is Glaurungj-FRC 0.2.5 compatible with Shredder GUI, Please play a complete
Chess960 game without using AntiChess. Please play a complete game without being
afraid to loose
PS: I will send you $50.00 Dollard if you can beat Glaurung in a 30 minutes
game, but I will go over your game and there should NOT be any three consecutive
moves played by Shredder or Pharaon-FRC. All the moves must be made by you![]()
First of all, your bet said nothing about how much games should have been played.
Secondly even if irrelevant due to (1), he surely did not play 50 games, because the time difference between your bet offer and his posting of two games (1 draw, 1 win), was not enough for such an amount 30min games and it would have been crazy to sacrifice his sleep for this.
Eduard is still here and can be informed for kicking your ass about the past![]()
Note: Please do NOT bring Edward into this, he will drag it for two pages
-
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Komodo Dragon 2.6 released
Another question, does the hardware matter? for instance I brought this Lenovo Ryzen 7 with me to the Dom. ReP. and want to know if for UCI_ELO settings at T/C Rapid (15' + 10") having a faster or slower hardware affect the human = Komodo Dragon UC_ELO ratings just like playing at greater T/C than Rapid (15' + 10" , I suppose that using an old Pentium versus this Ryzen 7 could yield a 150 to 250 ratings difference https://www.newegg.com/p/1TS-000E-0ND97 ... lsrc=aw.dslkaufman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:23 pmNote that the elo ratings in Dragon are intended to be about right for Rapid (15' + 10") chess, so any properly rated opponent (human or engine) should be a huge favorite against the same elo Dragon at classical (40/2 hours) chess; that's why the readme says to raise the setting by 200 for classical chess. Also note that the ratings are based on default setting (either with NNUE or Use Regular Eval), so if you select a personality it will likely play somewhat weaker than the stated elo. I'm running tests against various CCRL engines in Rapid, but the difficult question is how to convert a CCRL Rapid rating to a human Elo rating playing Rapid. There seems to be a wide range of opinions on this question.AdminX wrote: ↑Wed Dec 22, 2021 1:03 pm Great job on the human like ratings. I played two test games with Dragon 2.6 using the Human personality set at 2000 rating versus Novag Diablo 68000 v.2 level a7 (MessChess) estimated 2040 rating. Time control 40 moves in 2 hours. While I agree with others here that a time delay should be added instead of instant moving. The games had a balanced flow to them with normal errors for the class of players. I will now turn it up to 2040 and see how that goes.
[pgn]
[Event "banksia game"]
[Date "2021.12.22"]
[White "Dragon 2.6 by Komodo"]
[Black "Novag Diablo 68000 v.2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "40/7200+0"]
[Time "06:53:10"]
[Termination "mate"]
[ECO "D00"]
[Opening "Queen's pawn"]
1. Nc3 {+1.37/6 10 1779} d5 2. d4 {+1.16/6 10 1791; D00: Queen's pawn, Chigorin variation} Nf6
3. Bf4 {+1.46/6 10 1471} c5 4. e3 {+1.56/5 10 1261} a6
5. dxc5 {+1.81/5 10 1419} e6 6. Bxb8 {+1.86/6 10 2237} Rxb8
7. Qd4 {+2.08/6 10 1004} Bd7 8. Nf3 {+1.91/6 10 1069} Rc8
9. b4 {+2.28/6 10 1012} Be7 10. Ne5 {+2.26/6 10 1592} O-O
11. Bd3 {+2.60/6 10 1592} Qc7 12. O-O {+3.02/5 10 1288} a5
13. a3 {+3.29/5 10 1258} b6 14. c6 {+1.42/4 10 1383} Bxc6
15. f3 {+0.79/4 10 1656} axb4 16. axb4 {+0.77/6 10 2425} Bxb4
17. Nxc6 {+0.54/6 10 1790} Bc5 18. Qe5 {-0.99/5 10 990} Qxe5
19. Nxe5 {-0.95/7 10 939} Bxe3+ 20. Kh1 {-0.99/8 10 2628} Rxc3
21. Ra4 {-1.15/6 10 1509} Rfc8 22. Re1 {-0.85/6 10 1083} b5
23. Bxb5 {-1.04/6 10 1233} Rxc2 24. Rf1 {-1.63/5 10 1080} Rb2
25. Bd3 {-1.42/5 10 972} Kf8 26. g3 {-1.48/5 10 1333} Ke7
27. Re1 {-1.43/6 10 1404} Bf2 28. Rea1 {-1.37/6 10 1068} Rc3
29. R1a2 {-1.67/4 10 1037} Rxa2 30. Rxa2 {-2.69/6 10 1176} Bd4
31. f4 {-3.10/6 10 1066} Bxe5 32. fxe5 {-2.74/7 10 1077} Rxd3
33. exf6+ {-2.96/6 10 1540} gxf6 34. Ra7+ {-2.54/5 10 988} Kf8
35. Kg2 {-2.75/5 10 905} Rd2+ 36. Kf3 {-2.93/6 10 1176} Rxh2
37. Ke3 {-3.18/6 10 1612} e5 38. Kf3 {-2.70/5 10 1210} d4
39. Rd7 {-3.29/6 10 1585} f5 40. Rd5 {-3.62/5 10 928} f6
41. g4 {-5.00/6 10 1372} Rh3+ 42. Kf2 {-5.42/6 10 1059} fxg4
43. Rd7 {-5.43/6 10 1059} h5 44. Kg2 {-5.86/6 10 1847} d3
45. Kf2 {-6.61/6 10 2137} Rf3+ 46. Kg2 {-6.17/6 10 1207} h4
47. Rd6 {-6.68/6 10 1159} h3+ 48. Kh2 {-7.58/7 10 1356} Rf2+
49. Kg1 {-7.87/6 10 1263} g3 50. Rd8+ {-10.47/7 10 1103} Ke7
51. Rh8 {-19.62/7 10 1229} d2 52. Rh7+ {M-3/7 10 1251} Kd6
53. Rd7+ {M-2/13 13 935} Kxd7 54. Kh1 {M-1/99 10 197} d1=Q#
0-1
[Event "banksia game"]
[Date "2021.12.22"]
[White "Novag Diablo 68000 v.2"]
[Black "Dragon 2.6 by Komodo"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "40/7200+0"]
[Time "06:53:50"]
[Termination "mate"]
[ECO "D02"]
[Opening "Queen's pawn game, Chigorin variation"]
1. d4 d5 {-0.88/5 10 1096} 2. Nf3 Nc6 {-0.89/6 10 1918; D02: Queen's pawn game, Chigorin variation}
3. c4 e6 {-0.90/6 10 2430} 4. e3 Nf6 {-1.14/5 10 1037}
5. Nc3 Be7 {-1.32/5 10 1275} 6. Bd2 O-O {-1.41/6 10 1406}
7. Be2 dxc4 {-0.78/5 10 948} 8. O-O Bd7 {-0.74/6 10 1323}
9. Bxc4 a6 {-0.46/6 10 1904} 10. Qe2 b5 {-1.92/6 10 919}
11. Bd3 Nb4 {-0.84/6 10 1162} 12. Bb1 c5 {-0.67/5 10 1239}
13. Ne4 Nxe4 {-1.27/6 10 1102} 14. Bxe4 Bc6 {-1.33/6 10 1040}
15. Bxc6 Nxc6 {-1.08/6 10 1084} 16. dxc5 Bxc5 {-0.99/6 10 1445}
17. Rfc1 Qb6 {-0.57/6 10 1813} 18. Ng5 Rad8 {-1.10/6 10 1657}
19. Nxh7 Rfe8 {-0.40/6 10 1747} 20. Ng5 f6 {+0.34/6 10 1792}
21. Ne4 Rd5 {+0.38/6 10 952} 22. Qg4 Kf8 {+0.88/4 10 996}
23. Nxc5 Rxd2 {+1.95/6 10 2170} 24. Nxe6+ Kf7 {+4.50/7 10 1187}
25. Nxg7 Ne5 {+4.35/6 10 1315} 26. Qh5+ Kxg7 {+3.08/8 10 1119}
27. Qxe8 Qd6 {+4.23/6 10 2421} 28. a4 bxa4 {+3.23/5 10 1196}
29. f4 Qd5 {+2.11/5 10 1106} 30. e4 Qd4+ {+3.46/5 10 1300}
31. Kh1 Nf7 {+3.85/6 10 994} 32. h3 Qf2 {+2.26/6 10 1553}
33. Rg1 Qxf4 {+2.43/6 10 1184} 34. Rgd1 Qe5 {+2.63/4 10 1012}
35. Qxe5 Rxd1+ {+3.70/6 10 1543} 36. Rxd1 Nxe5 {+3.85/7 10 908}
37. Rd4 Kg6 {+3.92/7 10 1351} 38. g3 a3 {+3.90/6 10 1411}
39. bxa3 Kf7 {+4.11/6 10 1198} 40. Kg2 a5 {+4.84/6 10 1659}
41. Ra4 Ke6 {+5.03/6 10 970} 42. Rxa5 Nc4 {+5.17/6 10 951}
43. Ra4 Nd6 {+5.41/6 10 1166} 44. h4 Ke5 {+5.19/6 10 1645}
45. Kf3 Nb7 {+6.31/6 10 1570} 46. h5 f5 {+6.86/6 10 1578}
47. h6 Nc5 {+7.92/6 10 1040} 48. h7 Nxa4 {+11.05/6 13 4094}
49. h8=Q+ Kd6 {+250.00/6 10 2215} 50. Qd4+ Ke6 {+250.00/8 10 1096}
51. Qxa4 Ke5 {+250.00/12 10 957} 52. Qe8+ Kf6 {+250.00/11 22 909}
53. e5+ Kg5 {+250.00/8 10 953} 54. Qg8+ Kh5 {+250.00/10 10 1002}
55. Qg7 f4 {M-2/5 10 236} 56. Qh7+ Kg5 {+250.00/5 10 125}
57. gxf4# 1-0
[/pgn]