Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by Christopher Conkie »

kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I don't think I will Mr "Normal Shit".....or may I call you "Krapium"
;-)
very intelligent Chris...
nothing of substance, just childish insults.

You're intending to sabotage this thread, and turn it into a flame war?
...as you did with any threads you disagreed with 3 years ago during the Rybka/Fruit debate, in your position as Talkchess 'henchman'?

that's pitiful...
Not just intelligent......inventive. More inventive in fact than your dimwitted attempt at the insult of "Conkers" (which you conveniently forgot to quote you dummy).

You accusing anyone of any wrongdoing is like the pot calling the kettle black. You cant be that clever to come in here and pontificate of the subject of cloning. You must like getting slapped about the place. I believe I can hear the ocean.......
What thread are you reading?

Nowhere I been pontificating on the subject of clones.?
My post simply pointed out the inaccuracy of Roberto's acknowledgement...
He was told...in May 2010.

http://www.giocareascacchi.it/utility/f ... os.html/4/
maybe you come back when you are sober.
Maybe you should come back when you have bought a clock.
kranium
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:43 am

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by kranium »

Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I don't think I will Mr "Normal Shit".....or may I call you "Krapium"
;-)
very intelligent Chris...
nothing of substance, just childish insults.

You're intending to sabotage this thread, and turn it into a flame war?
...as you did with any threads you disagreed with 3 years ago during the Rybka/Fruit debate, in your position as Talkchess 'henchman'?

that's pitiful...
Not just intelligent......inventive. More inventive in fact than your dimwitted attempt at the insult of "Conkers" (which you conveniently forgot to quote you dummy).

You accusing anyone of any wrongdoing is like the pot calling the kettle black. You cant be that clever to come in here and pontificate of the subject of cloning. You must like getting slapped about the place. I believe I can hear the ocean.......
What thread are you reading?

Nowhere I been pontificating on the subject of clones.?
My post simply pointed out the inaccuracy of Roberto's acknowledgement...
He was told...in May 2010.

http://www.giocareascacchi.it/utility/f ... os.html/4/
maybe you come back when you are sober.
Maybe you should come back when you have bought a clock.
Yes, I'm sure as Talkchess 'clone hunter extraordinaire' you were completely on top of it!
Uncanny your skill, intuition, and expertise! No wonder you're the local henchman!

notice the nice quotes I used above...thanks for the tip!
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by Terry McCracken »

kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I don't think I will Mr "Normal Shit".....or may I call you "Krapium"
;-)
very intelligent Chris...
nothing of substance, just childish insults.

You're intending to sabotage this thread, and turn it into a flame war?
...as you did with any threads you disagreed with 3 years ago during the Rybka/Fruit debate, in your position as Talkchess 'henchman'?

that's pitiful...
Not just intelligent......inventive. More inventive in fact than your dimwitted attempt at the insult of "Conkers" (which you conveniently forgot to quote you dummy).

You accusing anyone of any wrongdoing is like the pot calling the kettle black. You cant be that clever to come in here and pontificate of the subject of cloning. You must like getting slapped about the place. I believe I can hear the ocean.......
What thread are you reading?

Nowhere I been pontificating on the subject of clones.?
My post simply pointed out the inaccuracy of Roberto's acknowledgement...
He was told...in May 2010.

http://www.giocareascacchi.it/utility/f ... os.html/4/
maybe you come back when you are sober.
Maybe you should come back when you have bought a clock.
Yes, I'm sure as Talkchess 'clone hunter extraordinaire' you were completely on top of it!
Uncanny your skill, intuition, and expertise! No wonder you're the local henchman!

notice the nice quotes I used above...thanks for the tip!
Why don't you take your argument to CTF?
Terry McCracken
kranium
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:43 am

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by kranium »

Terry McCracken wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I don't think I will Mr "Normal Shit".....or may I call you "Krapium"
;-)
very intelligent Chris...
nothing of substance, just childish insults.

You're intending to sabotage this thread, and turn it into a flame war?
...as you did with any threads you disagreed with 3 years ago during the Rybka/Fruit debate, in your position as Talkchess 'henchman'?

that's pitiful...
Not just intelligent......inventive. More inventive in fact than your dimwitted attempt at the insult of "Conkers" (which you conveniently forgot to quote you dummy).

You accusing anyone of any wrongdoing is like the pot calling the kettle black. You cant be that clever to come in here and pontificate of the subject of cloning. You must like getting slapped about the place. I believe I can hear the ocean.......
What thread are you reading?

Nowhere I been pontificating on the subject of clones.?
My post simply pointed out the inaccuracy of Roberto's acknowledgement...
He was told...in May 2010.

http://www.giocareascacchi.it/utility/f ... os.html/4/
maybe you come back when you are sober.
Maybe you should come back when you have bought a clock.
Yes, I'm sure as Talkchess 'clone hunter extraordinaire' you were completely on top of it!
Uncanny your skill, intuition, and expertise! No wonder you're the local henchman!

notice the nice quotes I used above...thanks for the tip!
Why don't you take your argument to CTF?
Nice to see you Terry!
I prefer to argue here...

You joining this topic late like this (with nothing substantial to contribute) reminds me of the 'good old days' (especially the Rybka/Fruit debate of 2008) when you and Conkers teamed up (remember, I coined the phrase Bonkers and McCrackers?) to pollute and trash each and every topic! (man you guys made a great Talkchess establishment Rybka fan-boy 'hit' team!).

Remember (if not, I've got some great links...) when C. Theron, Bob H., Zach W. and I, etc. were trying to discuss evidence that Rybka was made from Fruit? You guys sure as hell made a mess of any intelligent discussion with your constant flame wars and incessant personal attacks!

Man those were the good old days...glad to see you haven't changed, and are still trolling topics, and interjecting without any thought or substance.

Curious though...have you recently seen the light?
Seems your view on Rybka-Fruit has changed?

If so, welcome to the dark side!
Last edited by kranium on Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by gerold »

kranium wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I don't think I will Mr "Normal Shit".....or may I call you "Krapium"
;-)
very intelligent Chris...
nothing of substance, just childish insults.

You're intending to sabotage this thread, and turn it into a flame war?
...as you did with any threads you disagreed with 3 years ago during the Rybka/Fruit debate, in your position as Talkchess 'henchman'?

that's pitiful...
Not just intelligent......inventive. More inventive in fact than your dimwitted attempt at the insult of "Conkers" (which you conveniently forgot to quote you dummy).

You accusing anyone of any wrongdoing is like the pot calling the kettle black. You cant be that clever to come in here and pontificate of the subject of cloning. You must like getting slapped about the place. I believe I can hear the ocean.......
What thread are you reading?

Nowhere I been pontificating on the subject of clones.?
My post simply pointed out the inaccuracy of Roberto's acknowledgement...
He was told...in May 2010.

http://www.giocareascacchi.it/utility/f ... os.html/4/
maybe you come back when you are sober.
Maybe you should come back when you have bought a clock.
Yes, I'm sure as Talkchess 'clone hunter extraordinaire' you were completely on top of it!
Uncanny your skill, intuition, and expertise! No wonder you're the local henchman!

notice the nice quotes I used above...thanks for the tip!
Why don't you take your argument to CTF?
Nice to see you Terry!
I prefer to argue here...

You joining this topic late like this (with nothing substantial to contribute) reminds me of the 'good old days' (especially the Rybka/Fruit debate of 2008) when you and Chris teamed up to pollute and trash each and every topic with which you disagreed! (man you guys made a great 'hit' team!)

Remember (if not, I've got some great links...) when
Christophe Theron, Bob H., Zach and I, etc. trying to discuss evidence that Rybka was made from Fruit?
You guys sure made a mess of any intelligent discussion with your constant flame wars and incessant personal attacks!

Man those were the good old days...glad to see you haven't changed, and are still trolling topics, and interjecting without any substance.
Thanks for make things a little more interesting in here Norman.
The forum was getting a little dull. :- )

I think i asked you before. Any more improvments on Fire.

Best
Gerold.

P.S. Take a look over in CTF some nice beauties over there.
Not chess pieces. :- )
kranium
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:43 am

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by kranium »

gerold wrote:
Thanks for make things a little more interesting in here Norman.
The forum was getting a little dull. :- )

I think i asked you before. Any more improvments on Fire.

Best
Gerold.

P.S. Take a look over in CTF some nice beauties over there.
Not chess pieces. :- )
Hi Gerold!

Simply wanted to point out the inaccuracies in Roberto Munter's Deep Saros acknowledgement, and point out it was 99.99% IvanHoe...and just look at the reception I've received!

Wow...
it's absolutely heart warming!

I thought this thread was about Deep Saros..?

--------------------------------------------------
Yes, I am working on a new version of Fire...
and have made many improvements.

I am not releasing it though, because it has become clear to me that no matter how many new features are inlcuded,
now matter how much more stable the engine is...
doesn't matter...if you don't produce a huge ELO improvement you'll be roundly criticized.

Seems users only care about strength, and versions are judged solely on that aspect...
Last edited by kranium on Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45675
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by Graham Banks »

kranium wrote:Simply wanted to pint out the inaccuracies in Roberto Munter's Deep Saros acknowledgement, and point out it was 99.99% IvanHoe..
and just look at the reception I've received!

Wow...
it's absolutely heart warming!

I thought this thread was about Deep Saros..?
Did you take a look at Adam's post? What are your thoughts on his analysis?
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38772
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by Terry McCracken »

kranium wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
kranium wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I don't think I will Mr "Normal Shit".....or may I call you "Krapium"
;-)
very intelligent Chris...
nothing of substance, just childish insults.

You're intending to sabotage this thread, and turn it into a flame war?
...as you did with any threads you disagreed with 3 years ago during the Rybka/Fruit debate, in your position as Talkchess 'henchman'?

that's pitiful...
Not just intelligent......inventive. More inventive in fact than your dimwitted attempt at the insult of "Conkers" (which you conveniently forgot to quote you dummy).

You accusing anyone of any wrongdoing is like the pot calling the kettle black. You cant be that clever to come in here and pontificate of the subject of cloning. You must like getting slapped about the place. I believe I can hear the ocean.......
What thread are you reading?

Nowhere I been pontificating on the subject of clones.?
My post simply pointed out the inaccuracy of Roberto's acknowledgement...
He was told...in May 2010.

http://www.giocareascacchi.it/utility/f ... os.html/4/
maybe you come back when you are sober.
Maybe you should come back when you have bought a clock.
Yes, I'm sure as Talkchess 'clone hunter extraordinaire' you were completely on top of it!
Uncanny your skill, intuition, and expertise! No wonder you're the local henchman!

notice the nice quotes I used above...thanks for the tip!
Why don't you take your argument to CTF?
Nice to see you Terry!
I prefer to argue here...

You joining this topic late like this (with nothing substantial to contribute) reminds me of the 'good old days' (especially the Rybka/Fruit debate of 2008) when you and Conkers teamed up (remember, I coined the phrase Bonkers and McCrackers?) to pollute and trash each and every topic! (man you guys made a great Talkchess establishment Rybka fan-boy 'hit' team!).

Remember (if not, I've got some great links...) when C. Theron, Bob H., Zach W. and I, etc. were trying to discuss evidence that Rybka was made from Fruit? You guys sure as hell made a mess of any intelligent discussion with your constant flame wars and incessant personal attacks!

Man those were the good old days...glad to see you haven't changed, and are still trolling topics, and interjecting without any thought or substance.

Curious though...have you recently seen the light?
Seems your view on Rybka-Fruit has changed?

If so, welcome to the dark side!
You're senile, you old goat....I never opposed the fact that Rybka 1.0 was based on Fruit!

Your memory, like your manners is a source of aggravation for the rest of us.
Terry McCracken
kranium
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:43 am

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by kranium »

Graham Banks wrote:
kranium wrote:Simply wanted to pint out the inaccuracies in Roberto Munter's Deep Saros acknowledgement, and point out it was 99.99% IvanHoe..
and just look at the reception I've received!

Wow...
it's absolutely heart warming!

I thought this thread was about Deep Saros..?
Did you take a look at Adam's post? What are your thoughts on his analysis?
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38772
I'll take a look.
It looks interesting.
muxecoid
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:54 am
Location: Israel

Re: Deep Saros 2.3c5 Free UCI Engine is out

Post by muxecoid »

c5 in version number = Sicilian Defense reference?