I'm pretty sure that CEGT also test with learning off.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote: I guess that in the WBEC it plays without learning,right![]()
Regards, Graham.
Moderator: Ras
I'm pretty sure that CEGT also test with learning off.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote: I guess that in the WBEC it plays without learning,right![]()
Bingo!Graham Banks wrote: I'm pretty sure that CEGT also test with learning off.
Regards, Graham.
..and the opponent is of course the predecessor of the great Homer 3.0 (codename sparta)Michael Sherwin wrote:I look forward to more P3k though. This version is all over the place.
Werner wrote:..and the opponent is of course the predecessor of the great Homer 3.0 (codename sparta)Michael Sherwin wrote:I look forward to more P3k though. This version is all over the place.
regards
Romi would get killed, dont tell me I didnt warn you. However in my time controls Romi got like a 200 point advantage.Michael Sherwin wrote:Werner wrote:..and the opponent is of course the predecessor of the great Homer 3.0 (codename sparta)Michael Sherwin wrote:I look forward to more P3k though. This version is all over the place.
regardsOh, this should be interesting!
![]()
Tony?
Its not the relative ELO, its the relative IQ..Michael Sherwin wrote:If the ring that that creature coveted is the equivilent of ELO for the chess programmer then I am not that creature. Yet!But, to get ahead of and stay ahead of 'you know who' ... Lets just say that I sense my inner demon starting to awake!
![]()
btw: Can somebody tell me why the learning, specially here Romichess, should be so importent ? I think without learning is it just fair, like gerneral books.Werner wrote:Bingo!Graham Banks wrote: I'm pretty sure that CEGT also test with learning off.
Regards, Graham.