Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

Sedat Canbaz wrote:
jdart wrote:Arasan in theory supports up to 16 cores (MAX_CPUS=16 in config.h).

But it does not have a very efficient SMP implementation so will not make maximal use of more processors. I haven't tested it with more than four threads active.

I am working on a more efficient threading implementation but am making only slow progress.

--Jon
Hello Jon,

Currently i canceled Arasan 10 t4 test at SCCT,due to many losses on time (this happens with both wb/uci protocols)
http://www.sedatchess.com/scct_ratinglist.html
Have you ever tested Arasan 10 using 4 theads ?

Regards,
Sedat
BTW,I used Arena 1.99b4 GUI
jdart
Posts: 4405
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine

Post by jdart »

I have done some (not a lot) testing with 4 threads. But I don't have a quad machine. The best I can do is run it on a dual Xeon (which also has hyperthreading). Do you see time management problems only with 4 threads or in other situations also?

--Jon
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

jdart wrote:I have done some (not a lot) testing with 4 threads. But I don't have a quad machine. The best I can do is run it on a dual Xeon (which also has hyperthreading). Do you see time management problems only with 4 threads or in other situations also?

--Jon
I tried Arasan only with 4 threads,in the next days will try with 2 threads and if the problem still continue then will inform you

Regards,
Sedat