BTW,I used Arena 1.99b4 GUISedat Canbaz wrote:Hello Jon,jdart wrote:Arasan in theory supports up to 16 cores (MAX_CPUS=16 in config.h).
But it does not have a very efficient SMP implementation so will not make maximal use of more processors. I haven't tested it with more than four threads active.
I am working on a more efficient threading implementation but am making only slow progress.
--Jon
Currently i canceled Arasan 10 t4 test at SCCT,due to many losses on time (this happens with both wb/uci protocols)
http://www.sedatchess.com/scct_ratinglist.html
Have you ever tested Arasan 10 using 4 theads ?
Regards,
Sedat
Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
Re: Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine
-
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
Re: Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine
I have done some (not a lot) testing with 4 threads. But I don't have a quad machine. The best I can do is run it on a dual Xeon (which also has hyperthreading). Do you see time management problems only with 4 threads or in other situations also?
--Jon
--Jon
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
Re: Zappa Mexico (8 cpu) vs Top free UCI engine
I tried Arasan only with 4 threads,in the next days will try with 2 threads and if the problem still continue then will inform youjdart wrote:I have done some (not a lot) testing with 4 threads. But I don't have a quad machine. The best I can do is run it on a dual Xeon (which also has hyperthreading). Do you see time management problems only with 4 threads or in other situations also?
--Jon
Regards,
Sedat