I see that you use Fritz in multi-pvterminator wrote:With 3 minutes per move on a weak computer Fritz10 comes up with for move 19 :-
Code: Select all
Del Vecchio,A - Schön,W, WC26CT03 ICCF 2006 rr4k1/2q1bppp/p1bpp3/2n3P1/2QBP2P/2N2P2/PPP5/1K1R1B1R w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 10: 1. ² (0.45): 19.a3 Rb7 20.Ka1 Rab8 21.b4 Nd7 22.f4 Nb6 23.Qb3 e5 24.fxe5 dxe5 25.Be3 a5 26.b5 Nd7 2. = (0.10): 19.Qe2 Qb7 20.b3 (Enrico, 25.07.2008)
With 3 minutes per move on a weak computer Fritz10 comes up with for move 34 :-
It is likely he did not have a quad or even a dual core but you can see Fritz10 does not agree with those moves at 3 minutes per move. Fritz10 may be "weak" but ask Kramnik what happened. White's opening choices were not the best so in addition to getting decent hardware he may get a good book.Code: Select all
Del Vecchio,A - Schön,W, WC26CT03 ICCF 2006 1q6/5Ppp/4k3/2Q1p3/3pP2P/5P2/rrP5/2KR2R1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 10: 1. = (0.00): 34.f8N+ Qxf8 35.Qd5+ Kf6 36.Qc6+ Ke7 37.Qc5+ Kf7 38.Qd5+ Kf6 2. = (0.00): 34.Rxg7 Rxc2+ 35.Qxc2 Rxc2+ 36.Kxc2 Qc7+ 37.Kb1 Qb6+ 38.Ka2 Qa5+ 39.Kb3 Qc3+ 40.Ka4 Qc4+ 41.Ka3 Qc5+ 42.Kb3 (Enrico, 25.07.2008)
At least in the second case Rxg7 get the same score as the best move and I am interested in analysis without multi-pv that shows the depth and the score..
Uri