Naum 2.2 FRC testing completed - +74 ELO improvement

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Naum 2.2 FRC testing completed - +74 ELO improvement

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Kirill Kryukov wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:A strong chess engine is a combination of own opening book and the engine itself 8-)
Which is totally irrelevant for those who want to use an engine for analysis. Many people want to know how strong an engine is by itself, without book, and we are trying to provide such information. :-)

I estimate that very few people use engine with own book. Most of people don't play with an engine set to full strength, but use it to assist their games or preparation. In those tasks people often use huge game databases in the opening, not an engine book tuned to particular engine's style.

Best,
Kirill
I agree Kirill regarding the analysis issue,but people also need a rating list where the engines show their tournament strength and that's why no one uses a generic opening book in the official tournaments,or do they :!: :?: :roll:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44543
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Naum 2.2 FRC testing completed - +74 ELO improvement

Post by Graham Banks »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:people also need a rating list where the engines show their tournament strength
Hi Wael,

I'm not offended at all. :wink:

SSDF would suit your purpose and I'm sure that others possibly produce rating lists where engines use their own book.

Regards, Graham.
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Naum 2.2 FRC testing completed - +74 ELO improvement

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Graham Banks wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:people also need a rating list where the engines show their tournament strength
Hi Wael,

I'm not offended at all. :wink:

SSDF would suit your purpose and I'm sure that others possibly produce rating lists where engines use their own book.

Regards, Graham.
I do have such a rating list,it's huge but still private till now 8-)
Never the less,I always take a look at every new update of the CCRL rating list :!:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….