Gambit Rating List
Running : Gauntlet Seer 2.1.0
Time Control : Time control 40/120
Games : 1800
Results from file gauntlet-seer.pgn:
No. Name Win Draw Loss Unf. Score Games %
----------------------------------------------------------
1 Seer 2.1.0 +573 =558 -669 *0 852.0 1800 47.3%
2 Lzero v27 +128 =61 -11 *0 158.5 200 79.2%
3 Booot 6.5 +90 =71 -39 *0 125.5 200 62.8%
4 rofChade 2.3 +92 =58 -50 *0 121.0 200 60.5%
5 Berserk 4.3.0 +75 =51 -74 *0 100.5 200 50.2%
6 Weiss 1.4 +64 =72 -64 *0 100.0 200 50.0%
7 Stash 31.0 +60 =61 -79 *0 90.5 200 45.2%
8 Beef 0.3.6 +61 =53 -86 *0 87.5 200 43.8%
9 Wasp 4.50 +55 =65 -80 *0 87.5 200 43.8%
10 Halogen 10 +44 =66 -90 *0 77.0 200 38.5%
Total Games: 1800
White Wins: 629 (34.9%)
Black Wins: 613 (34.1%)
Draws: 558 (31.0%)
Unfinished: 0 (0.0%)
Estimated elo gain for Seer_2.1.0
Elo pool : 3184
Seer 2.0.1 : 3132.0
Seer_2.1.0 : 3164.1
Difference : 32.1
Seer 2.1.0 +32
Probably not the result you hoped for. Part of the blame is Lzero v27 (the Lc0 cpu version) that has an incredible score of 79% while its rating is somewhat lower than Seer 2.0.1. The perfect example of an "Angst-Gegner".
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Gambit Rating List
Running : Gauntlet Seer 2.1.0
Time Control : Time control 40/120
Games : 1800
Results from file gauntlet-seer.pgn:
No. Name Win Draw Loss Unf. Score Games %
----------------------------------------------------------
1 Seer 2.1.0 +573 =558 -669 *0 852.0 1800 47.3%
2 Lzero v27 +128 =61 -11 *0 158.5 200 79.2%
3 Booot 6.5 +90 =71 -39 *0 125.5 200 62.8%
4 rofChade 2.3 +92 =58 -50 *0 121.0 200 60.5%
5 Berserk 4.3.0 +75 =51 -74 *0 100.5 200 50.2%
6 Weiss 1.4 +64 =72 -64 *0 100.0 200 50.0%
7 Stash 31.0 +60 =61 -79 *0 90.5 200 45.2%
8 Beef 0.3.6 +61 =53 -86 *0 87.5 200 43.8%
9 Wasp 4.50 +55 =65 -80 *0 87.5 200 43.8%
10 Halogen 10 +44 =66 -90 *0 77.0 200 38.5%
Total Games: 1800
White Wins: 629 (34.9%)
Black Wins: 613 (34.1%)
Draws: 558 (31.0%)
Unfinished: 0 (0.0%)
Estimated elo gain for Seer_2.1.0
Elo pool : 3184
Seer 2.0.1 : 3132.0
Seer_2.1.0 : 3164.1
Difference : 32.1
Seer 2.1.0 +32
Probably not the result you hoped for. Part of the blame is Lzero v27 (the Lc0 cpu version) that has an incredible score of 79% while its rating is somewhat lower than Seer 2.0.1. The perfect example of an "Angst-Gegner".
Thanks for testing. This is indeed a poor result, though it's more in line with my expectation if we exclude Lc0. The results against Halogen and Wasp, in particular, look promising.