Fat Titz 1.1 released!

[Michel]

Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine that leaves nothing to the imagination.

I only write topic-related posts and I'm interested in this engine (unlike you). I can't judge what others write, my English is too bad for that. If something is wrong, it has to be corrected, that's what moderators are for!

Offensive postings can be corrected by moderators, and posters can be warned, this is what moderators are for. But to close a whole thread? We are not in a dictatorship!

If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".

[FredFergusonPM]

Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine that leaves nothing to the imagination.

I only write topic-related posts and I'm interested in this engine (unlike you). I can't judge what others write, my English is too bad for that. If something is wrong, it has to be corrected, that's what moderators are for!

Offensive postings can be corrected by moderators, and posters can be warned, this is what moderators are for. But to close a whole thread? We are not in a dictatorship!

If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".

Why don't you google "Fat Titz chess" instead ?

[dkappe]

Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine that leaves nothing to the imagination.

I only write topic-related posts and I'm interested in this engine (unlike you). I can't judge what others write, my English is too bad for that. If something is wrong, it has to be corrected, that's what moderators are for!

Offensive postings can be corrected by moderators, and posters can be warned, this is what moderators are for. But to close a whole thread? We are not in a dictatorship!

If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".

Why don't you google "Fat Titz chess" instead ?

Why not both.

You misunderstand me. I am a huge fan of this engine. It needs to be promoted much more, especially in advance of the Christmas holidays when many youngsters take up chess.

P.S. an image search on “Fat Titz chess” is definitely NSFW.

[FredFergusonPM]

Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine that leaves nothing to the imagination.

I only write topic-related posts and I'm interested in this engine (unlike you). I can't judge what others write, my English is too bad for that. If something is wrong, it has to be corrected, that's what moderators are for!

Offensive postings can be corrected by moderators, and posters can be warned, this is what moderators are for. But to close a whole thread? We are not in a dictatorship!

If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".

Why don't you google "Fat Titz chess" instead ?

Why not both.

You misunderstand me. I am a huge fan of this engine. It needs to be promoted much more, especially in advance of the Christmas holidays when many youngsters take up chess.

P.S. an image search on “Fat Titz chess” is definitely NSFW.

Yes, I agree. Google should improve their search algorithm to show relevant results.

[Eduard]

I think you (and dkappe) don't want to write constructively on the topic here, rather off topic. I hope that this thread is not closed because of this. No more off topic, please! Please open another off topic thread. THANKS!

[dkappe]

I think you don't want to write constructively on the topic here, rather off topic. I hope that this thread is not closed because of this. No more off topic, please!

I hope so too.

On an on topic note, I did a test recently that indicated that bigger nets aren’t really vulnerable to being outsearched. Perhaps Fat Titz by Stockfish can show the way for Regular Titz Stockfish? Enlarge the new arch in a similar way?

[Eduard]

What happened here? I play live on PlayChess, but this game is awesome BAD. For example, see White from move 30:

[pgn][Event "Tuesday 31 August Blitz Tour, 5+0, 15 RO"]
[Site "Machines A"]
[Date "2021.08.31"]
[Round "5"]
[White "E N, Fat Titz 310821 64 A"][Black "Victorious, Stockfish 310821"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2725"]
[BlackElo "2672"]
[PlyCount "109"]
[EventDate "2021.08.31"]
[EventType "swiss (blitz)"]

1. c4 {B 0} e5 {B 1} 2. Nc3 {B 0} Nf6 {B 1} 3. Nf3 {B 0} Nc6 {B 1} 4. e4 {B 0}
Bb4 {B 1} 5. d3 {B 0} d6 {B 1} 6. a3 {B 0} Bc5 {B 1} 7. b4 {B 0} Bb6 {B 1} 8.
Be3 {B 0} Bxe3 {B 1} 9. fxe3 {B 0} Ne7 {B 1} 10. d4 {B 0} Ng6 {B 1} 11. Bd3 {
B 0} O-O {B 1} 12. O-O {B 0} a5 {B 1} 13. b5 {B 0} c6 {B 1} 14. h3 {B 0} h6 {
B 1} 15. Qe1 {0.63/30 64} Bd7 {0.62/30 28} 16. Rc1 {0.58/31 0} Re8 {B 1 (Rb8)}
17. d5 {0.51/27 4} Nf8 {B 1 (Rb8)} 18. Nd2 {0.54/29 5} c5 {B 1} 19. Kf2 {
0.45/31 7} N8h7 {0.39/28 10 (g5)} 20. Ke2 {0.47/35 6} Kf8 {0.41/29 2 (g5)} 21.
Kd1 {0.37/29 10} Ke7 {0.34/29 2} 22. Be2 {0.47/31 4} h5 {0.28/27 2 (Rg8)} 23.
Qf2 {0.46/34 7} Rf8 {0.45/26 8 (g6)} 24. Kc2 {0.37/32 13} b6 {0.25/27 4 (g5)}
25. Kb3 {0.01/33 47} Qe8 {0.03/30 13} 26. Rh1 {0.00/32 0} Rh8 {0.01/25 3} 27.
Rcg1 {0.00/31 3} Qf8 {0.12/26 2} 28. Bd1 {0.00/31 8} Re8 {0.00/32 17 (Kd8)} 29.
Rf1 {0.00/28 4} Kd8 {0.00/30 4 (Qg8)} 30. Ka4 {0.00/33 8} Qe7 {-0.11/24 6 (Qg8)
} 31. Be2 {-0.07/27 7} Ref8 {-0.22/25 5 (Reg8)} 32. Rh2 {0.00/30 13} g6 {
-0.30/24 4 (Rfg8)} 33. Nb3 {-0.37/22 10} Ne8 {-0.69/20 3 (Kc7)} 34. Qe1 {
-0.47/23 7} h4 {-0.75/22 3 (Kc7)} 35. g4 {-0.61/25 6} hxg3 {-0.78/24 4} 36.
Qxg3 {-0.47/25 0} Qg5 {-0.76/25 3 (f5)} 37. Qxg5+ {-0.40/23 2} Nxg5 {-1.21/25 4
} 38. h4 {-1.18/27 0} Nh3 {-1.37/29 11 (Nh7)} 39. h5 {-1.18/26 4} g5 {-2.02/24
3 (gxh5)} 40. Nxa5 {-1.17/24 2} bxa5 {-2.07/23 1} 41. Kxa5 {-1.20/25 0} Kc7 {
-2.10/26 2} 42. Ka6 {-1.86/22 1} Kb8 {-2.32/23 3} 43. Kb6 {-2.07/25 3} f6 {
-3.48/23 7} 44. Rg2 {-2.77/26 0} Rh7 {-3.76/22 3 (Bc8)} 45. Ka5 {-2.68/24 2}
Rg8 {-3.84/23 1 (Kb7)} 46. Rh1 {-3.80/23 11} Rhh8 {-4.37/23 4} 47. Ka4 {
-4.04/17 3} g4 {-4.54/25 4} 48. Nd1 {-4.31/21 0} f5 {-6.47/27 4 (Kb7)} 49. exf5
{-6.62/27 6} Bxf5 {-7.30/24 4} 50. Bxg4 {-7.31/24 0} Rxg4 {-7.69/25 7} 51. Rxg4
{-7.62/26 0} Bxg4 {-8.05/23 4} 52. Nc3 {-7.76/24 0} Rxh5 {-8.47/24 4 (Ng5)} 53.
Kb3 {-8.12/22 2} Ng5 {-8.90/24 3 (Nf6)} 54. Rf1 {-7.87/17 0} Nf3 {-9.11/24 2}
55. Ne4 {-8.46/21 0 E N,Fat Titz 310821 64 A resigns (Lag: Av=0.17s, max=0.9s)}
0-1[/pgn]

Sopel, can you fix this bad playing? See where the king is on move 30 and the moves after that - horrific.

[Damir]

Fat Titz is a joke and should be thrown into garbage...

[FredFergusonPM]

I think you don't want to write constructively on the topic here, rather off topic. I hope that this thread is not closed because of this. No more off topic, please!

I hope so too.

On an on topic note, I did a test recently that indicated that bigger nets aren’t really vulnerable to being outsearched. Perhaps Fat Titz by Stockfish can show the way for Regular Titz Stockfish? Enlarge the new arch in a similar way?

Could you elaborate what "Fat Titz by Stockfish" and "Regular Titz Stockfish" are ?

From the OPs GitHub, Fat Titz 1.0 and 1.1 are a fork of CFish.
Official Stockfish hasn't released it.

Since your legal expertise and insider contacts are unmatched in this forum, can you tell us where did you see Official Stockfish release it ?

[Michel]

I think you don't want to write constructively on the topic here, rather off topic. I hope that this thread is not closed because of this. No more off topic, please!

I hope so too.

On an on topic note, I did a test recently that indicated that bigger nets aren’t really vulnerable to being outsearched. Perhaps Fat Titz by Stockfish can show the way for Regular Titz Stockfish? Enlarge the new arch in a similar way?

Could you elaborate what "Fat Titz by Stockfish" and "Regular Titz Stockfish" are ?

From the OPs GitHub, Fat Titz 1.0 and 1.1 are a fork of CFish.
Official Stockfish hasn't released it.

Since your legal expertise and insider contacts are unmatched in this forum, can you tell us where did you see Official Stockfish release it ?

You got it wrong. It's a fork of Cock Fish.