What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
Fat Titz 1.0 released
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 am
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
Ideas=science. Simplification=engineering.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:00 pm
- Full name: Henk Drost
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
It's literally a regular surname.
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
- Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.
Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.
-
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 am
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:08 pmThere has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
Ideas=science. Simplification=engineering.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
- Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
Are you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:12 pmIt is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:08 pmThere has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.
Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.
-
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 am
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
Yes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:18 pmAre you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:12 pmIt is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:08 pmThere has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.
The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.
Ideas=science. Simplification=engineering.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
- Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
It seems to me that we both refer to the same problem, but whereas I want to tackle it by improving the future, you want to tackle it by accomodating to the past.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:28 pmYes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:18 pmAre you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:12 pmIt is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:08 pmThere has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.
The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.
dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.
Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.
-
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 am
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
It is the other way round. You are prolonging the past. Why did you choose female anatomy to refer to your engine? Right: sexualization of women always draws attention.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:39 pmIt seems to me that we both refer to the same problem, but whereas I want to tackle it by improving the future, you want to tackle it by accomodating to the past.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:28 pmYes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:18 pmAre you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:12 pmIt is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:08 pmThere has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.
The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.
You could indeed have called your engine "Fat Cock" (Cock is a surname as well) which would have been a nice statement.
Ideas=science. Simplification=engineering.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
-
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:14 pm
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
And what about the load of bollocks to all thisMichel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 3:07 pmIt is the other way round. You are prolonging the past. Why did you choose female anatomy to refer to your engine? Right: sexualization of women always draws attention.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:39 pmIt seems to me that we both refer to the same problem, but whereas I want to tackle it by improving the future, you want to tackle it by accomodating to the past.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:28 pmYes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:18 pmAre you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:12 pmIt is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.Sopel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:08 pmThere has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?Michel wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 1:53 pm What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".
Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....
And you're trying to reinforce this backward viewSo references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.
Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.
The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.
You could indeed have called your engine "Fat Cock" (Cock is a surname as well) which would have been a nice statement.
"May your next game be your best"
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 6:17 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Fat Titz 1.0 released
Am currently playing against a player called Titzhoff - some would find that offensive. Well tufftitz to that.
Looking forward to FatButz, FatLipz, FatToez and so on.
Thank you Mr Sopel +5 !!