Fat Titz 1.0 released

[Michel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

[Raphexon]

It's literally a regular surname.

[Sopel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

[Michel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.

[Sopel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.

Are you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.

[Michel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.

Are you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.

Yes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.

Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.

The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.

[Sopel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.

Are you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.

Yes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.

Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.

The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.

It seems to me that we both refer to the same problem, but whereas I want to tackle it by improving the future, you want to tackle it by accomodating to the past.

[Michel]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.

Are you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.

Yes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.

Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.

The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.

It seems to me that we both refer to the same problem, but whereas I want to tackle it by improving the future, you want to tackle it by accomodating to the past.

It is the other way round. You are prolonging the past. Why did you choose female anatomy to refer to your engine? Right: sexualization of women always draws attention.

You could indeed have called your engine "Fat Cock" (Cock is a surname as well) which would have been a nice statement.

[Hurnavich]

What I wanted to say is that whether men would be offended by "Fat Cock" is irrelevant to the issue that women would be offended by "Fat Titz".

Women have long suffered and still stuffer from sexualization by men. So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

If you think it is just a joke, think of your engine being used by a female chess player....

There has not been a single female that complained about the name of this engine. There have however been 2 men who did on their behalf. Why are you victimizing women?

So references to female anatomy carry a lot more weight than references to male anatomy.

And you're trying to reinforce this backward view

It is rather obvious that on an exclusively male forum no women would react. And why the truth would be backward I do not understand.

Are you saying there's something inherently different to referencing female anatomy as opposed to male anatomy? Don't put your, or society's, prejudice as truth, please.

Yes it is different because of the context. This is not prejudice.

Many professional women find booth babes offensive, while few men would have problems with a male version.

The fact that "booth babes" are mostly female is precisely because men like to sexualize women.

It seems to me that we both refer to the same problem, but whereas I want to tackle it by improving the future, you want to tackle it by accomodating to the past.

It is the other way round. You are prolonging the past. Why did you choose female anatomy to refer to your engine? Right: sexualization of women always draws attention.

You could indeed have called your engine "Fat Cock" (Cock is a surname as well) which would have been a nice statement.

And what about the load of bollocks to all this

[maxdeg]

Am currently playing against a player called Titzhoff - some would find that offensive. Well tufftitz to that.
Looking forward to FatButz, FatLipz, FatToez and so on.

Thank you Mr Sopel +5 !!